• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Adise on principles of Land Law

Extracts from this document...


Advise Horace on the appropriate principles of property law in these two situations: 1. Horace has bought Hillview House (HH), because he likes the southerly views. The land to the south was sold by Horace's predecessor in title, Bertie, to Peregrine, a property developer. Peregrine proposes to build a six storey development of executive apartments, Pilemhi (P). Horace has told Peregrine he cannot do this because Horace has a right to the view. Peregrine laughed and ordered 8 million tons of bricks. 2. Horace's neighbour, Clarence, is a farmer who has purchased additional fields (AF) to the east of HH. Bertie permitted Clarence to cross the land of HH to reach the new fields. Clarence used many different ways across HH but they all end at a gate in the boundary fence of HH, through which Clarence reaches AF. Clarence built a tractor shed on his land close to the gate. He can only reach the shed by crossing the land of HH. Horace has put a padlock on the gate and told Clarence he may no longer cross HH's land. The law of property is a complex and intricate topic which is subject to numerous exceptions and bodies of rules. The easiest way to understand property law and in turn apply it to legal situations is to identify the key principles upon which property law is based. Primarily it is important to remember that a property right is merely a concept in land, rather than actually being the physical asset itself. ...read more.


This proves difficult to establish because to define a view would inevitably restrict anybody from building anywhere in that view. In addition, whilst property can be said to be permanent, a view cannot due to there being little or no restriction to build beyond the owners land but within their view. In conclusion to the situation it would appear that there is no supportive precedent for a right to a view and as Horace would find it almost impossible to define his view as a right, there are no legal remedies to prevent Peregrine from building Pilemhi. 2. In advising Horace, it must be noted that Clarence obviously has an interest in Horaces' land due to it being the only access to his own land. The problem is what type of interest is it, is it capable of being a particular interest and how has it been created. The interest is most likely to be an easement, which is defined as being a right exercised over one plot of land for the benefit of another. However, an easement is heavily defined and for the claim to be capable of being an easement it must satisfy the four characteristics listed by Dankwerts J in Re Ellenborough Park (1956)8. These characteristics are as follows; there must (1) be a dominant and servient tenement, (2) the right must accommodate the dominant tenement, (3) the dominant and servient tenements must be owned by different people and (4) ...read more.


It was held in the case of Hollins v Verney16 that a right of way used three times in twenty four years was not sufficiently continuous. Thirdly, the user must be by or on behalf of the fee simple. Traditionally at common law, an easement could only be established by prescription if it had been enjoyed from time immemorial which is set at 1189. However, courts are now prepared to accept that a right enjoyed for twenty years may constitute a right by prescription. Due to the difficulties of proving use since 1189, the courts agreed that if a right had been enjoyed for a period of twenty years or more they could presume that a deed had been granted but lost, which was deemed a lost modern grant. Finally, the Prescription Act (1832) provides the only statutory support for a prescriptive easement. The Act requires that "no act or other matter shall be deemed to be an interruption"17, therefore allowing for a claim under the act when there has been less than twenty years user, but requires that it has been for at least nineteen years and a day. In conclusion, Horace should be advised that although an easement can be proved to exist, there is little evidence that a deed ever existed, therefore Clarence is solely reliant on the method of prescription which requires prolonged and continuous use of the easement. If this cannot be proved, Clarences' only alternative would be to rely upon a bare licence which would be based upon Berties permission to use the land. This type of licence is personal, freely revocable and does not bind third parties, such as Horace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Land Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Land Law essays

  1. Lease/Licence Distinction

    In order for there to be exclusive possession there has to be a unit which is let as a spate dwelling. In essence the tenancy must be a self contained residence. In Wright 7 the Court of Appeal held that for this to be satisfied a person must undertake all

  2. General Principles of Land Law, Fixtures, Chattels

    The cinema seats were installed for the more convenient use of the property, not to their use as chattels. In Vaudeville Electric Cinema Ltd v Mauriset6, seats secured to the floor of a cinema hall were fixtures. Normally, free-standing seats would be considered chattels.

  1. An easement essentially is a right in anothers land and confers both a benefit ...

    Secondly, the easement itself on the servient tenement must accommodate the dominant tenement, meaning that it is imperative that it is connected with its enjoyment as well as for its benefit, as in Hill v Tupper6. This rule has caused somewhat controversy over the years as this case, along with

  2. Overreaching, Land Law

    the person found out from a person who had nothing to do with the course of dealings6. Constructive notice 'a purchaser shall not be prejudicially affected by notice of any.... instrument or matter or thing unless it is within his own knowledge, or would have come to his knowledge if

  1. Property Law - Problem Question

    The answer would not be different had the land been unregistered. A legal tenancy would automatically binds the whole world by virtue of its legal nature while an unconstituted estate contract is still ineffective even in equity. H further granted a ten-year lease, in another part of his land, to G, in signed writing.

  2. Property law: Land Law.

    a shop let for 10 years, the tenant is in arrears, the premises appear to be abandoned and the landlord enters the property to make it safe The tenancy agreement in this instance would be a lease under LPA 1925 s.1 of a 'term of years absolute, of 10 years.

  1. Land Law Problem Question; Adverse Possession, Easements, Covenants and Overriding Interests.

    Essentially this means that Nigel must have acted in good faith, something of value (not necessarily money) must have been given in consideration for the exchange of the legal (as opposed to equitable) estate. The notion of being means the purchaser must be without notice of the equitable rights.

  2. Land law problem question - access

    Fourth, the right must be lie in grant. Since an easement is a right capable of existing at law, it must capable of being granted by deed.[28] Bones must show the following: There must be both a capable grantor and a capable grantee[29], a grantor must have the power to grant the easement (Mulliner v Midland Railway Co[30])[31];

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work