• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Adise on principles of Land Law

Extracts from this document...


Advise Horace on the appropriate principles of property law in these two situations: 1. Horace has bought Hillview House (HH), because he likes the southerly views. The land to the south was sold by Horace's predecessor in title, Bertie, to Peregrine, a property developer. Peregrine proposes to build a six storey development of executive apartments, Pilemhi (P). Horace has told Peregrine he cannot do this because Horace has a right to the view. Peregrine laughed and ordered 8 million tons of bricks. 2. Horace's neighbour, Clarence, is a farmer who has purchased additional fields (AF) to the east of HH. Bertie permitted Clarence to cross the land of HH to reach the new fields. Clarence used many different ways across HH but they all end at a gate in the boundary fence of HH, through which Clarence reaches AF. Clarence built a tractor shed on his land close to the gate. He can only reach the shed by crossing the land of HH. Horace has put a padlock on the gate and told Clarence he may no longer cross HH's land. The law of property is a complex and intricate topic which is subject to numerous exceptions and bodies of rules. The easiest way to understand property law and in turn apply it to legal situations is to identify the key principles upon which property law is based. Primarily it is important to remember that a property right is merely a concept in land, rather than actually being the physical asset itself. ...read more.


This proves difficult to establish because to define a view would inevitably restrict anybody from building anywhere in that view. In addition, whilst property can be said to be permanent, a view cannot due to there being little or no restriction to build beyond the owners land but within their view. In conclusion to the situation it would appear that there is no supportive precedent for a right to a view and as Horace would find it almost impossible to define his view as a right, there are no legal remedies to prevent Peregrine from building Pilemhi. 2. In advising Horace, it must be noted that Clarence obviously has an interest in Horaces' land due to it being the only access to his own land. The problem is what type of interest is it, is it capable of being a particular interest and how has it been created. The interest is most likely to be an easement, which is defined as being a right exercised over one plot of land for the benefit of another. However, an easement is heavily defined and for the claim to be capable of being an easement it must satisfy the four characteristics listed by Dankwerts J in Re Ellenborough Park (1956)8. These characteristics are as follows; there must (1) be a dominant and servient tenement, (2) the right must accommodate the dominant tenement, (3) the dominant and servient tenements must be owned by different people and (4) ...read more.


It was held in the case of Hollins v Verney16 that a right of way used three times in twenty four years was not sufficiently continuous. Thirdly, the user must be by or on behalf of the fee simple. Traditionally at common law, an easement could only be established by prescription if it had been enjoyed from time immemorial which is set at 1189. However, courts are now prepared to accept that a right enjoyed for twenty years may constitute a right by prescription. Due to the difficulties of proving use since 1189, the courts agreed that if a right had been enjoyed for a period of twenty years or more they could presume that a deed had been granted but lost, which was deemed a lost modern grant. Finally, the Prescription Act (1832) provides the only statutory support for a prescriptive easement. The Act requires that "no act or other matter shall be deemed to be an interruption"17, therefore allowing for a claim under the act when there has been less than twenty years user, but requires that it has been for at least nineteen years and a day. In conclusion, Horace should be advised that although an easement can be proved to exist, there is little evidence that a deed ever existed, therefore Clarence is solely reliant on the method of prescription which requires prolonged and continuous use of the easement. If this cannot be proved, Clarences' only alternative would be to rely upon a bare licence which would be based upon Berties permission to use the land. This type of licence is personal, freely revocable and does not bind third parties, such as Horace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Land Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Land Law essays

  1. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    not yet been acquired by adverse possession before that date.[69] While the third exception receives good feedback, there are disputes over the other two exceptions that they are too general as where the words of para.5 (2) makes it possible to invite a variety of interpretations, second exception makes it

  2. Free essay

    Landlord and Tenant Law

    1 EGLR 67. and states, "terraced houses had been built many decades ago without a damp-course. The Court of Appeal was adamant that complaints about damp required improvement of the property rather than repair". A similar case concerning damp, but on this occasion resulting from condensation, was cited by Dr Andrew McGee in The QUT Law and Justice Journal (2007).

  1. Land Law

    (Chapelle (2007 p353) notes that Lord Denning stipulated in Quennel v Maltby (1979), "a mortgagee will be restrained from getting possession except when it is sought bona fide and reasonably for the purpose of enforcing the security and then only subject to such conditions as the court thinks fit to impose."

  2. Proprietary Estoppel - Asserting a right or preventing a fact? It will be ...

    shock the conscience of the court, the analysis needs to be looked at again.'23 This judicial approval from Lord Walker is understood to be widespread.24 It was previously thought that the aim of the courts was the enforcement of the promise and consequently the expectation25, rendering proprietary estoppel akin to other forms.

  1. Tenancy case question. The problem faced by Linda is whether or not Terry, Tina ...

    The reality is that Terry and Tina were in fact paying the rent jointly once a month. The test laid out in AG Securities v Vaughan14 provided that there needs to be four unities present: the unity of possession, interest, title and time.

  2. Concept of proprietary estoppel - it could be said that the courts are restrictive ...

    But if a stranger built knowing on my land, there is no principle of equity which prevents me from insisting on having back my land, with all the additional value which the occupier has imprudently added to it. If a tenant of mine does not the same thing, he cannot

  1. Land law problem question - access

    that the exercised right was based on an informal agreement, which might infer that the express words creating an easement may not appear in the actual documentation. Bones might acquire through an implied grant or prescription. An implied grant will be either through ?necessity? or ?common intention? however both methods

  2. Land Law Case. In advising Mary, it must be noted what rights she has ...

    by a common intention of the parties, under the rule in ?Wheeldon v Burrows? (1897) and Under Section 62 of the LPA 1925. These methods of obtaining easements with an implied grant can often overlap, because as easements are created by implication they are then more complicated to define, because

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work