• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

American Public Law Brief. RACHEAL ROBERTS, PLANTIFF v. BRIANAIR, INC - Whether the district court erred in ruling that the provisions of the Humber State statute that set out to protect individuals like the plaintiff from single parenthood discriminatio

Extracts from this document...


RACHEAL ROBERTS, PLANTIFF v. BRIANAIR, INC No 2011.78 December 15, 2011 BRIEF FOR THE APPELLANT QUESTION PRESENTED The appellant will address the following question: Whether the district court erred in ruling that the provisions of the Humber State statute that set out to protect individuals like the plaintiff from single parenthood discrimination fall within the ambit of "law[s] related to a price, route, or service" of such carriers and, therefore, are pre-empted by the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), 49 U.S.C 41713(b)(1). STATEMENT OF THE CASE Statutory and Regulatory Background At its very core, the pre-emption doctrine is a judicial tool with which the federal government defines the ambit covered by federal control of the subject when Congress has legislated pursuant to one of its enumerated powers. The legal claim to this doctrine lies in the US Constitution which provides: 'This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land; ... any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.' US Const. Article VI � 1, cl 2. These powers of pre-emption have been grouped under three categories: * Express Pre-emption * Field Pre-emption * Conflict Pre-emption. Field pre-emption and Conflict pre-emption are classified as sub-categories of implied pre-emption. In the case of field pre-emption, the courts will infer an intention to preempt state law if the federal regulatory scheme is so pervasive as to "occupy the field" in that area of the law. In conflict pre-emption, the court voids state law in cases whereby it is impossible for the private party to adhere to both federal and state law or where state law stands in the way of accomplishing the intention and purpose of congress.1 Finally is express pre-emption, where the federal statute explicitly states that it overrides state law. The starting point for the application of the doctrine of pre-emption is the fact that there is a basic presumption against pre-emption of ...read more.


In coming to this conclusion, the court stated: "we see no congressional purpose that would be served by denying to FAA-certified pilots, in the name of pre-emption, the protection of Hawaii's law from employment discrimination based on physical disability"17. The reasoning applied by the court was an extension of the Colorado Commission case. The court added disability discrimination laws to the areas excluded from pre-emption which already included laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on race, colour, religion, or sex18. We submit that this priciple should be applied to the case at hand. Ms Roberts, by being discriminated against for her status as a single mother finds herself in a similar situation to the victims of discrimination in the other cases. In the Colorado Court of Appeal case of Belgard v United Airlines,19 the Court was faced with the task of determining whether or not a law relating to handicap discrimination was sufficiently related to the airline 'prices, routes and services'. In ruling that it was, the Court stated that "any law...that restricts an airline's selection of employees, based on their physical characteristics must necessarily have a connection with...the services to be rendered by that airline".20 It can be deduced from this ruling that the physical handicap as seen in this case is related to the services rendered by the airline. The on-the-job performance of these employees could be affected and could be significant in the commercial aspects of the operation of United Airlines. The facts of this case are however different from the one in question here. The on-the-job performance of Ms Roberts is unaffected by her status as a single-mother. The defendants also stated that her perfomance, in spite of the two incidents remained "satisfactory". The extensive support of case law available in the cases listed above show that employment standards remain under state policing powers in the eye of the court. For example, in the racial discrimination context, courts generally agree that neither air safety nor market efficiency is appreciably diminished by the operation of state laws forbidding racial discrimination. ...read more.


[*1013] 4 Morales v Transworld Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 378 (1992). 5 U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation:1978. 95th Cong., 2d sess., 1978. Committee Print, 95-631. 6 R. Vietor, 'Contrived Competition: Airline Regulation and Deregulation, 1925-1988'. The Business History Review, Vol 64 No 1. (1990), Pg 76. 7 Morales v Transworld Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 378 (1992). 8 Aloha Islandair., v. Linda Tseu, Hawaii Civil Rights Commission 128 F.3d 1301 (1997) 9 Attorney General of Maine v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Association, et al. 553 U.S. 364 (2008) 10 American Airlines v. Wolens, 513 U.S. 219 (1995) 11 Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission v. Continental Airlines, Inc. 372 U.S. 714 no. 146. (1963) 12 Erie R. Co v Tompkins. 304 U.S. 64 (1938) 13 Branche v. Airtran Airways, Inc., 342 F.3d 1248 14 Ibid at [*1259] 15 Wellons v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 165 F.3d 493, 495 (6th Cir. 1999); Parise v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 141 F.3d 1463, 1467-68 (11th Cir. 1998); Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 128 F.3d 77, 84 (2d Cir. 1997) 16 Aloha Islandair Inc. v. Tseu, 128 F.3d 1301, 1303 (9th Cir. 1997) 17 Ibid 18 Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission v. Continental Airlines, Inc. 372 U.S. 714 no. 146. (1963). 19 Belgard v. United Airlines, 857 P.2d 467 (Colo.Ct.App.1992) 20 Ibid. [*470] 21 Attorney General of Maine v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Association, et al. 553 U.S. 364 (2008) 22 U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics: Program Perspectives. (2010) Vol. 2, Issue 2. 23 U.S Bureau of Labour Statistics: 'Issues in Labor Statistics' (2010) Summary 10-06 24 Don DiFiore, et al., Petitioners v American Airlines, Inc. 454 Mass. 486 (2009). 25 Duncan v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 208 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 2000) 26 Ibid 27 Charas v. Tran World Airlines, 160F.3d 1259 (9th Cir. 1998) 28 H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 95-1779, at 53 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3773 (emphasis added). 29 See, e.g., Riviera v. Delta Airlines, Inc., No. CIV.A. 96-1130, 1997 WL 634500 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 26, 1997); Dudley v. Business Express, Inc., 882 F. Supp. 199, 206 (D.N.H. 1994). ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Other Jurisdictions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Other Jurisdictions essays

  1. Narni Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited. This paper examines the agreement ...

    Narni that "the Bank would not refuse to honour cheques drawn on the ground that the balance of the account exceeded the approved overdraft limit of $65,000" (cited by Tadgell JA at para 11). By not honouring the cheques, the court found that the Bank breached the arrangement that existed between it and Narni.

  2. Anticipatory Bail under CRPC. A critical study of the recent amendments and judicial interpretation ...

    which is a joint venture of the Central Government and the State of Maharashtra under Sections 406 and 409 r/w 34 of IPC. The applicants moved the High Court for anticipatory bail. But the High Court rejected their bail application.

  1. Elucidate Doctrine of Res Judicata in the Light of Decided Cases

    such issue has been subsequently raised, and has been heard and finally decided by such Court. Explanation I: The expression "former suit" shall denote a suit which has been decided prior to the suit in question whether or not it was instituted prior thereto.

  2. Introduction to American Law. 5 questions on the US legal system.

    The election of judges is a unique aspect to the justice system in the United States as most countries avoid this selection method. The political system in the United States was founded on the concept that the citizens of the country would best be able to elect who should represent them in the government.

  1. Australian Court vist report. In observing the R -v- Spina case there were many ...

    I'm assuming the crown prosecution wanted more of a challenge from the defence, as the defence wasn't as good as what they could have been. The defence lawyer seemed confused at times at what he was saying, and even brought an expert witness from Melbourne only to be inadmissible in court.

  2. Hong Kong Constitutional Law - in order to combat cross-border crime in an effective ...

    previous one as signed between Hong Kong and foreign countries.107 Secondly, the double criminality principle can be excluded from the rendition agreement as it will help fighting against crime.108 Nevertheless, the transfer could only occur when the requesting party based its jurisdiction on the territorial principle and any request based

  1. Domestic Violence - changes of law through history.

    accommodation who are experiencing financial hardship and suffering poor health, and who consume excessive quantities of alcohol and use drugs. Other methods such as attempting to identify victims through their groupings as demonstrated by the BCS (above) with some further help from Saunders (cited in Campbell 1995)

  2. Unilateral Divorce in Muslim Law

    TALAQ UNDER THE HOLY QURAN The view that the Muslim husband enjoys an arbitrary, unilateral power to inflict instant divorce does not accord with Islamic injunctions. It is a popular fallacy that a Muslim male enjoys, under the Quranic Law, unbridled authority to liquidate the marriage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work