• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Apply Sinclair and Coultards (1975) framework of discourse analysis to at least three extracts from a play of your choice. Comment on analysis and draw on Burton's (1980 chapter 7) reworking of their framework.

Extracts from this document...


Apply Sinclair and Coultards (1975) framework of discourse analysis to at least three extracts from a play of your choice. Comment on analysis and draw on Burton's (1980 chapter 7) reworking of their framework. I have applied Sinclair and Coultard's framework to three extracts from the play 'Two' by Jim Cartwright. I found studying the first extract very interesting because although the Landlord and Landlady are complying with the turn taking rules, they are both talking to imaginary customers and not each other. Therefore an elicitation from the Landlady (move 4) is not answered, as expected by the Landlord but by the imaginary customer. The Landlords next move is a directive to the Landlady but is not related to her elicitation. Another thing that I found exceptional about this extract, is that there are usually two or more acts per move. For example: when the Landlord offers a directive (move 5) the Landlady's first act is a linguistic reply to his directive then she makes a comment to her imaginary customer. ...read more.


Such as "Right then..." This changes the direction of the dialogue from one customer to another or from the Landlady to a customer. There is also use of expressive particles such as "Uh" or "Er". This adds to the reality of the drama, as in everyday talk we use these noises as part of our diction. The directives used in this extract are thrown to and from the Landlord and the Landlady. Neither offers any directives to the customers. Another thing that sets this extract apart from classroom discourse is that the directives are generally insulting. For example in move five the Landlord tells the Landlady to "Get it together". Unusually the Landlady does not react in the way that Sinclair and Coultard's framework expects her to. This is because within a classroom environment there is a power dimension that is missing between two adults in everyday life. The next extract is between two of the customers in the pub. ...read more.


Again, I can relate a lot of Sinclair and Coultard's framework to this extract, probably more so than the last extract because of the power dimension and the fact that they are both talking directly to each other. Another thing that I noticed, that I can relate to classroom discourse is that Roy prompts Lesley. In the framework it is stated that a prompt means that the teacher no longer just requests a response but now demands one. This is not something that we experience in everyday talk, as it's impolite to demand an answer in this way. Again there are a great deal of markers in this extract. In this 21-move extract there are 7 markers, in some moves there is more than one marker. For example in move 13 there are two: "Right" and "Ha". This is Roy moving from one line of interrogation to another. You can see that he doesn't want the other customers in the pub to hear his confrontation with Lesley. Which is why he changes direction when things get too heated. One other thing that I found interesting was move 20. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act or section 7 of the Clayton Act. [FN59] Without entering into complex cost analyses and determinations, the Court therefore held that the condemnation of Brown and Williamson's prices as predatory would probably block them at a high level, especially in this

  2. EU - problem question

    on the free movement of workers. However, the principle has been extended beyond Directives to include any breach of EU law, by the ECJ in Brasserie du Pecheur13. (In this case a German beer purity law was found to be in breach of Art 28 that provides for the removal

  1. What barriers must be removed in the European Union to ensure the free movement ...

    into entering another market, as they have to consider either adapting or retesting products. Companies, as a result, often forsake opportunities of export as it involves high production costs to enter into a market, where there is increased competition. Technical barriers to trade include: public procurement, customs & fiscal formalities

  2. Company Law and Corporate Governance

    consult the area of corporate governance and in December 2002, the Cadbury Report was published11. Cadbury's key proposal was in relation to non-executive directors12, in particular it proposed for companies to adopt a committee system as a means of enhancing the efficiency of the board structure13 Cadbury also recognised the

  1. European Union - When and to what extent are directives 'directly effective'?

    to decide whether EU prevailed over national law since this was a matter of national constitutional law. They also argued that the EC treaty was no different from any other international treaty creating obligations only between states and that the concept of direct effect would thus contradict the intentions of those who had created the treaty.

  2. An investigation into the problems that have arisen with regard the use of the ...

    demands from and responses within the system have become dynamic forces for the expansion of the competence system itself'3. Gr�inne de Bu�rca believes that the 'post-Maastricht period of EU governance has been characterised by an approach of greater caution and consolidation'4 mainly through the implementation of the principle of attributed

  1. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    In response the Principle of Proportionality cannot be applied in relation to basic rights and freedoms and EU Law must be strictly applied. Article 49 is one such freedom and if there is a breach then it is not a matter for Domestic Law.

  2. What was the relationship between the Factortame case and the Treaty of Rome 1957?

    the legal protection which persons derive from the direct effect of provisions of Community law[34]. Thus, interim relief is to be granted pending a ruling from the ECJ as to whether a conflict exists. The ECJ added its objection both to the domicile and to the residence conditions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work