• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

As the significance of marriage declines in family law there is no longer any justification for excluding cohabitation from full legal recognition. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


As the significance of marriage declines in family law there is no longer any justification for excluding cohabitation from full legal recognition. Discuss. As the question assumes that the significance of marriage is declining in family law, the first task of this essay will be to establish whether this is factually the situation. This will be ascertained using trends in the divorce rate, the effect of statutes on marriage, and consideration of whether marriage was ever particularly significant in family law anyway. The justification, if one exists, of excluding co-habitation from legal recognition will then be discussed, developing into more in depth reasoning regarding co-habitation, and whether it should enjoy a status in any way analogous to that of marriage. The more controversial issue of the extension of such rights to same sex couples will then be considered, in view of recent case law, and the Human Rights Act 1998. The role of marriage in society can be said to have been in decline in the latter half of the twentieth century, with statistics showing the marriage rate generally declining, especially in the final thirty years of the century, whilst the divorce rate increased. "Between 1971 and 1991 marriages fell by almost sixteen percent while divorces more than doubled. For every two marriages in Britain in 1991, there was one divorce1" The factors behind such trends are varied, complex and impossible to clarify succinctly, as each individuals reasons for getting divorced, or for not getting married are different. ...read more.


A sign that the importance of marriage is declining is the increasing importance of children and parenthood as a basis around which the family is built. This is exemplified by the abolition of the married couples tax allowance in 2000, and the introduction of the Children's Tax Credit in 2001 which is paid regardless of whether the parents are married. The financial benefits of being married have significantly decreased and in this is a strong suggestion that the importance of marriage in law and within politics is decreasing. The position is succinctly stated by Dewar: "The growth in extra-marital cohabitation, and in the numbers of children born outside marriage, has had two consequences, both of which have decentred marriage as a legal concept. The first is growing practical and political pressure to grant non-marital relationships some form of legal 'recognition'. The second is an increased prominence for the legal status of parenthood.10" However, the important areas of property and intestacy, still create distinctions between those couples that are married and those that are not. Griffiths LJ has previously re-iterated the importance of this distinction, finding that cohabitants can only expect a portion of the benefits of marriage if they were living together with the same level of commitment as a married couple11. The emphasis on financial contribution, or oral agreement12 can lead to great injustice in the area of property and financial support, as in the case of T v S (Financial Provision for Children)13. ...read more.


There are serious issues that the possible registration of same sex partnerships raises. The scheme as discussed so far would extend only to same sex couples. This is possibly discriminatory towards heterosexual couples who do not wish to embark on the formality of wedded life, but would like to take advantage of the legal position of married couples. This could possibly be from a financial viewpoint, or if for example a father wishes to acquire the parental responsibility that only a husband currently holds. This may however be impractical, as if a couple that could marry choose not to do so, it seems quite likely that they would not proceed with the option of registration. In conclusion, it certainly would appear that the importance of marriage is declining in family law, although it is seen by many as an institution that is fundamental to the functioning of society, and the role of the family itself. It is however undeniable that the numbers that cohabit is increasing whilst the number of marriages decreases. Although there needs to be some legal recognition of the status of cohabitants, to give them equality with married spouses may be detracting from the institution of marriage itself. However, its current status, which legally is quite weak, with piecemeal legislation applying is not adequate. There needs to be a specific legislative effort that recognises that marriage is not always necessarily the norm in a modern society, and confers rights on people who wish to take the option of not marrying. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Family Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Family Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The distinctions between void and voidable marriages serve no purpose in modern family law ...

    4 star(s)

    Section 11 (a) (i) is the first ground which is the prohibited degrees of relationship2. It is set out in three parts: consanguinity, where a person is blood related to the person they are attempting to marry; affinity, which that person has a marriage tie with the other; and this

  2. The present law governing cohabiting couples has been widely criticized; so much so that ...

    can seek a court order requiring one to pay maintenance to the other (mainly in divorce). The most significant fact is that on divorce or dissolution the court had the power to redistribute property owned by either party. However, on the ending of an unmarried relationship the court only has

  1. Research Proposal. This proposal will look at the various rights and responsibilities that are ...

    It gives unmarried fathers parental responsibilities and rights by amending section 3 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995, so that if the father; * Is married to the mother at the time of conception * Is registered as the child's father in a UK register of birth It allows him

  2. Are cohabiting couples treated as if they were married? Critically review recent proposals to ...

    This is vested in both married parents, however according to the Children Act 19895, if the mother cohabits with the father but is not married to him, she has exclusive parental responsibility. However, due to Adoption and Children Act 20026, the unmarried father at the time of the child's birth

  1. Cohabitation Law Reform

    to cohabitants for two reasons: reluctance to treat parties who had never married as if they had and because the MCA 1973 is itself under judicial attack.10 Secondly, the Law Commission rejected amending Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 this would be outside of its remit and would not help childless cohabitants.

  2. How Has The Law Adapted To Changes In Society With Regard To Marriage And ...

    In some cases the parliament delegates the law-making, also known as the delegated legislation, which is also from changes or motions of society, as orders in council e.g. would be a direct answer to a need or a change in society.

  1. Cohabitation - the need for legal reform

    Conversely, considering the possible issues that are thought the Church of England may have with regard to cohabitation, it was stated in an article that The Church of England was in support for there to be more limited legal reform for unmarried couples in cases not involving children but where

  2. Problem Question, Divorce& FInancial Provision

    Thirdly, the meetings were too inflexible to provide information which meet people?s personal needs. Fourthly, in majority of cases, only the person petitioning for divorce attended the meeting but the other parties[12] depend for their success on the willing involvement of both parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work