• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the value of lay decision-making in the criminal justice system by reference to the role of the jury and Justices of the Peace.

Extracts from this document...


Assess the value of lay decision-making in the criminal justice system by reference to the role of the jury and Justices of the Peace. What is Jury? The jury has been an integral part of our legal system since at least the 13th century if not, as some commentators suggest, for nearly a thousand years. Many regard it as the institution which best expresses the philosophy of the English legal system. The concept of the jury excites great passions, both among its supporters and its critics. The jury is concerned only with questions of fact. It is never concerned with questions of law. Currently in most criminal cases the charge is first considered by a grand jury with between 12 and 23 members. Fine-tuning Jury's qualification The Criminal Justice Act 2003 also amended the Juries Act 1974 by abolishing certain categories of ineligibility (excluding mental disorder), and excusal as of right. The bar on judges, clergy, etc is lifted. MPs, etc are no longer entitled to refuse to serve. These groups now must do jury service unless they can show good reason not to do. They only limitation now is disqualified and mentally disordered individuals: no-one is excused as of right. Pros and Cons of Jury Jury has been variously described as the safeguard of liberty; an essential check upon unpopular laws; the best means for establishing truth. ...read more.


His application was based upon breach of Article 6 European Court of Human Rights, the right to a fair trial. During the course of the trial a sealed letter was sent to the judge by a juror expressing concern that 2 fellow jurors had been overheard telling racist jokes. The applicant and his co-accused were both Asian. The trial judge invited the jurors to examine their consciences overnight. The following morning he received 2 letters, one of which was signed by all members of the jury strenuously refuting any suggestion of racial bias, and the second from one member of the jury apologizing for earlier comments which might well have been overheard, and declaring that he was not racially biased. The judge decided not to discharge the jury, which eventually convicted the applicant and acquitted his co-accused. It was held by the European Court of Human Rights that the trial judge had not taken sufficient steps to remove doubts as to the jury's impartiality. An appeal against conviction based on Article 6 European Court of Human Rights was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in Smith (Lance Percival) 2003. The grounds of appeal were that the evidence of the black defendant conflicted with that of the white witness, and that all the jurors were white. It was held that since the offence arose from the common event of violence outside a nightclub, the jury was capable of trying the issues fairly and impartially. ...read more.


Overall the research concludes that both lay magistrates and District Judges fulfil a useful role within the criminal justice system and should be retained. At the same time, there is no reason why the balance of contributions of each type of magistrate could not be altered without prejudicing the integrity of a system which is based upon strong tradition. The Auld Review of Criminal Courts 2001 proposed that magistrates should decide where the defendant is to be tried. As a compromise the Criminal Justice Bill 2002 increased magistrates' sentencing power so that fewer cases need go to the Crown Court. Magistrates' Proposed Future In January 2001, a report entitled Community Justice by Professor Andrew Sanders for the Institute for Public Policy Research called for the replacement of panels of lay justices by panels composed of District Judges, the former stipendiary magistrates, assisted by 2 lay magistrates. According to Professor Sanders: "These proposals would increase public confidence, and they would enhance the contribution ordinary members of the public make to our justice system." The value of Justice of Peace's Lay Decision The Magistrates' Association took a rather different view and saw the proposals as an attack on what was already an extremely representative system of justice. According to the chairman, Harry Mawdsley, the proposed scheme would cost around �30 million annually in salaries alone, but apart from costs: Lay magistrates provide community justice: they are ordinary people who live and work in the local community and who have an intimate knowledge of that community. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. "Should lay magistrates be replaced with professional judges?" Discuss

    Only 20% or defendants are found not guilty. Also a concern is the fact that their inconsistent with other benches of magistrates elsewhere in the country in the sentences they pass, so that for similar offences people may receive different treatment.

  2. Describe the main appeal routes for defendants for the Magistrates Court and Crown Court, ...

    creates a precedent for any future case involving the same point of law. Under s36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 the Attorney General can apply for leave to refer an unduly lenient sentence to the Court of Appeal for re-sentencing.

  1. Critically analyse the effectiveness of lay people and compare and contrast the roles played ...

    any other defendant against whom there may be a hostile climate of public opinion. In civil cases, it is also his duty to appear not only for a particular interest group with which he might prefer to identify but for every interest group"3 The second principle branch of the legal

  2. Should the jury trial be abolished?

    Proposed Improvements In relation specifically to the problem with the selection of juries, there have been numerous recommendations: - That every endeavour should be made to ensure that the electoral rolls are comprehensive and include everybody who ought to be included.

  1. Lon Fuller - professor of Jurisprudence at Harvard.

    I have mostly neglected the debate in 1958 in the Harvard Law Review in this context since the key issues are drawn out in Hart's "Review"[44] and Fuller's "Reply to Critics". Two ideas mark the positivist project: (1) a belief in a general criterion by which the law could be identified and differentiated"; (2)

  2. Lay Magistrates occupy a particularly controversial position in the English Judiciary. They are usually ...

    is organised by either the Courts or the prosecution [who] are predominantly telling them about how to convict... they aren't telling them about the importance of seeing that the accused are protected." (p. 148, Ibid.) It does not seem infeasible that rather than filling the Lay Magistracy with the ranks

  1. The Jury System.

    The committee recommended that the right to do jury service should correspond with the right to vote. This reform was introduced by the Criminal Justice act 1972 and the relevant law can now be found in the juries' act 1974.

  2. 'The Criminal Cases Review Commission plays a vital role in the criminal justice system. ...

    like how referrals by the Home Secretary did.[4] Hence, every repeated referral by CCRC must have evidence that is not mentioned in the previous appeal. Only the freshest will do. Until now, only the case of Tony Stock has been referred to the CA twice by the CCRC (Robins, 2014).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work