• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Company law - case study on setting up a business.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

B.1 (a) The setting up of a business involves the creation of a corporation. A corporation is an artificial legal person created by law and thus has rights and obligations which must be adhered to by law. There are two distinct types of corporation. In the case of David, Eleanor, Frank and Gina their corporation would be a 'corporation aggregate'. A corporation aggregate consists of a number of persons who, in law, form a single person, the single person would be DEFG (Boatcraft) Limited. Corporations aggregate can be further broken down into three different types of companies; chartered companies, statutory companies and registered companies. DEFG would come under the category of registered companies and are formed under the relevant company legislation, currently the Companies Act 1985. The four friends want their company to be a limited company and therefore their company would be a private company. The promotion of a company is concerned with taking the steps necessary for incorporation. The promotion of small private company will normally, although not exclusively, be carried out by the owner or owners of the pre-incorporated business (www.godloves.co.uk). An application for registering a corporation involves filing certain documentation with the Registrar of Companies. The documents required for registration are listed in section 10 of the Act1. The Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association are documents which make up the constitution of the company. A statement giving the address of the company's registered office and the details of the company's first directors and secretary must also be lodged along with a statutory declaration of compliance which lets the registrar know all the requirements of the 1985 Act2 have been met. ...read more.

Middle

This was demonstrated in the case of Webb v Earle9 A Debenture is not regarded as a share but as a loan and is the usual form a company takes to borrow money. The debenture holder is a creditor and not a member of the company. There are many types of debentures. A secured debenture is a debenture which is secured by placing a charge on the company's assets. This is done either by the creation of a provision in the debenture or by terms held in the trust deed which deals with the issue. (ii) Debentures may be secured by 'means of a fixed or floating charge, or by a combination of both'. (Keenan et al, Company Law, "Debentures and Charges", pg 422) A fixed charge takes the form of a legal mortgage. It usually applies to specified assets such as the company land and building and fixed plant. The charge is created by a deed held under the Law of Property Act 1925 section 85 (1). By securing the debenture against the company the friends can ensure the company's overdraft. In the event the friends have no land or buildings the bank can take a fixed charge over their books. While under a fixed charge the company can not do away with the assets to which the charge is applied. A floating charge is not attached to any particular assets which the company may hold at the time of the charge. ...read more.

Conclusion

A petition for the winding-up may be placed. In the event of this happening a liquidator is appointed who realises the assets and pays the creditors. After the company's affairs are wound up the court passes an order dissolving the company. DEFG (Boatcraft) Limited would be a case of the members winding-up the business. Section 84 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that voluntary liquidation may commence if a fixed period has been settled for the duration of the company and the fixed period has passed, if the company resolves to be wound up voluntarily by special resolution or if the company resolves by special resolution to be wound up on the basis that it cannot by reason of liabilities continue its business. Once the required resolution is obtained a notice of theresolution must be published within 14 days in the Edinburgh Gazette14. The winding up then commences on the day that the resolution is passed15. Under the Insolvency Act, there are two procedures that can be followed in voluntarily liquidation. When members' voluntarily wind-up the company a statutory declaration of solvency is delivered to the registrar. If the directors are unable to make a declaration, the winding-up proceeds as a creditor's voluntary winding up. After the liquidator has realised the company's assets, he must pay off the company's debts. Once distribution is completed the liquidator must call a meeting of the relevant parties in order to present the accounts. These final accounts along with a return of the meeting are then lodged with the Registrar. Once the Registrar receives this information he lodges the accounts and within three months of receipt the company will be dissolved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Commercial Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Commercial Law essays

  1. Company law - directors duties

    The general knowledge, skill and experience that the director has. The above is required for an objective standard but one raised by the actual knowledge, skill and experience of a particular director if this is greater. Chuah, J (2007) points out that this very verbose provision in the act recognises

  2. To what extent is the rule contained in the Salomon v. Salomon & Co. ...

    Ltd was a conduit through which Horne sought to carry on his business while evading the terms of the covenant. On appeal Gilford Motors was granted an injunction against both defendants (Horne and JM Horne & Co. Ltd). Despite the defendant company (JM Horne & Co Ltd)

  1. Coporate Law and Limited Liability. There are certain circumstances in which courts will have ...

    S should be personally liable for the debts of the company. The House of Lords ruled that S was not liable for the company debts since the business and debts belonged to the company not S. Example 2: Macaura v Northern Assurance [1925] Macaura (M)

  2. The academic debate concerning on the directors duties is one of the oldest issues ...

    two key components: a duty to avoid conflicts of interest Aberdeen Railway co v Blaikie Bros 32 and not to make secret profits from their fiduciary position (Keech v Sandford)33.these long established principles are stated in CA 2006,S175 as follows: Section 175 of the CA 2006 "seeks to restate the

  1. Company Law, s.33 CA '06

    A third line enunciated by G.D. Goldberg in his article believes that Professor Wedderburns proposition is too wide and that Professor Gowers is too narrow, he proposes a middle way in which a member could only enforce a provision of the articles which related to the functional capacity of the company "eventhough the enforcement of that

  2. Commercial Law Case. Jack needs to be advised regarding the two issues he has ...

    24. The common law rule nemo dat quod non habet means that a seller of goods cannot transfer ownership to a buyer if the seller has no right to sell the goods.

  1. Company Law. This report aims to look into the unique feature of the company ...

    As per S17 (8)14, "the directors of a company will be liable for any third party loss if the public companies trade without obtaining certificate and fail to comply with any obligations under a transaction within twenty one days". Rigidly enforced in Durham Fancy Goods v Micheal Jackson (Fancy Goods)

  2. Company Law Assignment. I will identify the theory of a corporate personality, demonstrate ...

    âshamâ companies to retrieve the money for his own purpose was something that the courts felt, was inexcusable and something that the Salomon principle could not justify, and as a result, the veil pierced. This judgement created the fundamental facade test; where if a company is created for the purpose

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work