• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Company Law

Extracts from this document...


Section 14 states 'Subject to the provisions of this Act, the memorandum and articles, when registered, bind the company and its members to the same extent as if they respectively had been signed and sealed by each member, and contained covenants on the part of each member to observe all the provisions of the memorandum and articles' Lord Greene MR said of this provision that it had been "the subject of considerable controversy in the past, and it may very well be that there will be considerable controversy about it in the future" (Beattie v E and F Beattie Ltd [1938] Ch 708 at p.721). Since Parliament enacted the Companies Act in the mid- 19th century, English companies legislation has contained a declaration that a company memorandum and articles of association constitute a contract which binds the members. At present, s.14 of the Companies Act 1985 establishes the statutory contract. The section stipulates that the memorandum and articles bind a company and its members as though these documents had been signed and sealed by each member and contained covenants on the part of each member to observe all their provision. Hoffman LJ did affirm the contractual status of the articles of association and the memorandum in the case of Harrison & Sons plc [1994]1 and in Hickman v Kent or Romney Sheepbreeders Assoc [1915]2, the articles contained clause saying disputes between members and the Association had to be referred to arbitration. Hickman sought to commence court proceedings against the association. The courts held Hickman could not do this without first submitting dispute to arbitration member had contracted by virtue of s14 to refer disputes to arbitration. ...read more.


In Bradford Banking Co. v. Briggs, the articles gave the defendant company a lien on its members' shares. The plaintiffs, who were equitable mortgagees of certain shares, brought an action against the mortgagors and the company to enforce their security. The company claimed priority for their lien. Lord Blackburn said, "...the only one of the articles of association which I think it material to notice is the 103rd article ... I think it bound's to the company as much as if he had at the time he became holder of these shares executed a covenant to the company in the same terms as article 103, but I do not think it was bound any further..." In Wood v. Odessa Waterworks Co, which was an action by the plaintiff on behalf of himself and all other shareholders against the company, Stirling J. said,"...The articles of association constitute a contract not merely between the shareholders and the company, but between each individual shareholder and every other..." In Salmon v Quin & Axtens Ltd, Farwell LJ, referring to this last statement, said, "...I think that that is accurate subject to this observation, that it may well be that the Court would not enforce the covenant as between individual shareholders in most cases..." In Welton v. Saffery, Lord Herschell, who dissented on the main question from the rest of the House, made the following general observation, '...Sect. 16 of the Act of 1862 provides that the articles of association, when registered, shall bind the company and the members. Thereof to the same extent as if each member had signed his name and affixed his seal thereto...' ...read more.


The quality of the jurisprudence is not beyond reproach. In terms of statutory interpretation, the judiciary has ignored the express wording of s.14, which states that the statutory contract extends to 'all provision of the memorandum and articles of association' this was supported by R. Gregory. There is change in s.33 that as opposed to section 14(1) using the words 'memorandum and articles', s. 33 uses 'company's constitution'. The controversy the case of Hickman was conflicting by Quinn and Axtens. Lord Wedderburn based his thoughts upon the case of Quinn and Axtens in opposition of Astburys judgment in Hickman. Goldbergs resigned with his middle path, stating that all articles of appointment are interests for shareholders as well as members. Outsider rights in articles are within the scope of s. 20, since if this was not the case than a line of cases starting with 'qua member' cases would not be taken a precedent. s. 20 statutory contracts was taken in McKewan, where he stated it is not a part of the duty of courts to find reasons to avoid contracts. Rather it is their duty to support those contracts and to not avoid them. There is simply too much authority for outsider rights to be ruled as unenforceable. In the Eley case should had been treated as authority for one principle which was not even represented in any of those judgments. Astbury J less consideration of past cases in Hickman, and his overruling of Hampson was worthy of credit. 1 BBC 475 CA 2 1 Ch 881 3 8 Ch App 956 4 LR 9 CP 503 5 1 ExD 88 6 37 Ch D 1, CA 7 R Gregory (1981) 44 MLR 526 8 3 All ER 214 9 CLJ 194 10 35 MLR 11 2 hare 461 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Commercial Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Commercial Law essays

  1. Corporations in law. A corporation under Company law or corporate law is specifically ...

    as well as to facilitate commercial ventures in which the company may be interested. The principle further act to attract and encourage corporate investment, much needed in any society to speed up development. It is believed to be the springboard to raise managerial standards in a corporate organization.

  2. Company law - directors duties

    (London: DTI June 2006), Vol 1 [Anon.](2001) Company Law Review-Final Report Published. Jordans Journal. 73(2). Books Alcock, A. Birds, J. Gale, S. (2007) Companies Act 2006: The new Law. 1st Edition. Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited Bourne, N (2008) Bourne on Company law. 4th Edition. United Kingdom: Routledge Cavendish Bruce, M.

  1. Introduction to Commercial Law. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of resolving a civil ...

    During the process, the decision is made by the parties involved and no one else. Since an average mediation takes a single day, the efficacy of this method is much quicker. It is less costly and less formal than litigation or an arbitration hearing and thus it saves money as well as time.

  2. Company Law, s.33 CA '06

    It is a contract of the most sacred character, and it is on the of it that each shareholder advances his money. The difference between the statutory contract and a standard commercial contract was illustrated in Bratton v Oxborough 5 where Steyn L.J.

  1. Both the common law and statute make it too easy for buyers to reject ...

    This is not the effect of any statute, but is part of the common law relating to the breach of a term of a contract. The clauses of common law treat a breach of a term in a contract which is sufficiently important to be treated as a repudiation of the contract.

  2. the resurgence of transnational commercial law

    This universalistic view of law appeared clearly with comparative law studies which had been set out in Paris in 1990 by two well-known French jurists EDOUAED LAMBERT and RAYMOND SALEILES who showed enthusiasm towards promoting a universal common law through comparative law studies: A world law must be created-not today

  1. Commercial Law Coursework

    a s.117 certificate under the Companies Act 1985 (requirement for minimum issued share capital of �50,000 of which 25% must be paid up) c) The company is an old public company d) The company has not commenced business within a year of incorporation or has suspended business for a year e)

  2. Company Law Assignment. I will identify the theory of a corporate personality, demonstrate ...

    The decision was unanimous that a piercing of the veil was necessary to ensure that the defendants could not breach his covenant, by awarding his previous employer (The claimants) an injunction preventing him from soliciting clients and using the incorporate company as a mere ?cloak or sham? to continue with no restrictions as laid down in his covenant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work