• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and evaluate the success of the drug control policies of Sweden and the Netherlands.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and evaluate the success of the drug control policies of Sweden and the Netherlands. Sweden and the Netherlands are seen to be at the opposite ends of the spectrum concerning drug policy. The Netherlands adopts a very liberal approach while Sweden adopts a harsh repressive policy. However both argue their policy is the best method and have been successful in dealing the with the drug problem. This question is important as we are at a time where the European Union (EU) is making large efforts to make a unified policy on drugs for all member states. However this is near impossible with such contrasting methods, aims and ideology for drug policy in Sweden and the Netherlands, with many other states following one or the other. This essay will compare and evaluate the policies of both states' drug policy and will argue that even though on the surface both countries are successful, the Netherlands' liberal approach has been far more successful than Sweden's repressive approach. The essay will be divided into three sub-sections. The first section will be concerned with detailing the drug policy of both Sweden and the Netherlands. The second section will examine the success of the Netherlands' drug policy as well its failures. The third section will examine the success of Sweden's drug policy but through evaluation and details of failures will argue that in reality under the surface it has not been that much of a great success. This first section will look at the drug policies of first the Netherlands and then that of Sweden. Drug policy for the Netherlands is generally characterised as liberal, pragmatic and rational. The aim for the Dutch drug policy is not ridding society of drugs all together as this is seen as very much impossible. Instead, the primary goal is to limit risks in conjunction with drug use and so the policy is based on 'normalisation', which means drugs are seen as "...a normal problem affecting society in general, rather than a problem facing the abnormal and therefore isolated individual user." ...read more.


Others simply come to the Netherlands to purchase drugs and take them home to make a profit. Many of the Netherlands' neighbouring states are annoyed by this and so does the fact that 80% of the EU's amphetamines are of Dutch manufacture. However, from a realist perspective, states do what they can to protect their state and its own people and therefore the negative consequences on other states are not an issue. Nevertheless, the Netherlands have undertaken more repressive policies to discourage foreign tourism and to "ensure that any effects of the Dutch drug policy may have on other states will be anticipated and dealt with by themselves," (Chatwin, 2003, p570). The police and customs officials of the relevant countries are now working together to control large scale drug trafficking organisations operating across the borders, (Dorn, 1999, p204 and Clutterbuck, 1995, p152). It has been argued that the policy cannot have been that successful as there has been increasing polices of a repressive nature. For example the "frequent use of the municipal by-law by which the open use of drugs is prohibited with arrest and conviction of users," (Dorn, 1995, p204) or the 'streetjunkie project', which is a package of measures designed to push and force the group of so called 'extremely problematic drug users' to kick the habit. Another policy is the 'binnenstadverbad', which is a 'city centre banning order', by which drug users who repeatedly cause public disturbance may be refused entry to a substantial part of the city centre for a fortnight, (Mol & Trautmann, 1995, p220). However, just because a certain policy works well at one time it does not mean it should be kept unchanged. With drugs there is a need for flexibility to deal with new problems or certain problems coming to the forefront which may arise. An increase in repressive policy for certain aspects is judged to be the best for further success and therefore should be followed but in no way has the Netherlands lost their liberal, pragmatic approach. ...read more.


This may partially account for much of the variation in heroin addiction between the Netherlands and Sweden. Ollson and Lenke argue that the statistical explanatory power of repressive policies if one excludes the peripheral position and low unemployment of Sweden during the 1980s results in it being 'not statistically significant', meaning repressive policies are not significant for explaining the low drug use and problems in Sweden (Dorn, Jepsen and Savona, 1996, pp109-110). One has to look at the drug use and problems in the context of the country, and its culture and history. Historically, Sweden has not had a problem with illegal drug use and their culture has been that of conformity. The Swedish population in general has a negative view of drug use and is convinced that drugs pose a major threat to society. In conclusion, the problems of drugs in our society is so complex, no nation's drug policy will work completely. The Netherlands have a liberal drug policy and it seems to have worked well. On the other hand the Swedish have a repressive policy and it seems to have worked on the surface but in reality is has not at all very well. The success gained by Sweden can be more explained by their previous more liberal policy in the 1960s and 1970s and also the lack of exposure to the drugs market and low unemployment as well as their inherent culture. The implications of this is that for other countries aiming to formulate an effective drug policy may observe the Netherlands greater success and move towards a liberal drugs policy. Moreover, it is impossible to reach a common drug policy for the whole EU with such contrasting approaches and therefore in the future if the EU was ever to push for a unified drug policy, it may also move more towards a liberal approach. I acknowledge the ambiguity of the effects of such a liberal or repressive drug policy may have on other countries but this is unavoidable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Other Jurisdictions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Other Jurisdictions essays

  1. Anticipatory Bail under CRPC. A critical study of the recent amendments and judicial interpretation ...

    so that there will not be any misuse of this power and this was the intention of the legislature when they inserted this special provision in 2003. For this provision the applicant can either approach the Sessions Court or High Court and in case if he approach the High Court

  2. Introduction to American Law. 5 questions on the US legal system.

    Therefore these rights are applicable in private matters. 3. Discrimination through the Travel Agency The travel agency could explicitly or implicitly discriminate through their intention to market the travel packages exclusively to gay couples who are of Asian extraction. A explicit discrimination means that the action specifically disadvantages a racial or other protected group.

  1. Hong Kong Constitutional Law - in order to combat cross-border crime in an effective ...

    Firstly, due to the difference criminal justice values and processes between HK and China and the mutuality nature of a formal rendition agreement, Hong Kong Government and Hong Kong people must be ready to accept that under the rendition agreement, the surrender of fugitives must be different from all the


    of the Antarctic Treaty (Environment Treaty (Environment Protection Act)) 1980 (Cth).38 HSI, as an 'interested person'39 commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia before Justice Allsop on 19 October 2004. They sought an injunction to stop Kyodo from any further whaling practices in the AWS.

  1. American Public Law Brief. RACHEAL ROBERTS, PLANTIFF v. BRIANAIR, INC - Whether the ...

    Brianair puts forward the argument that its size makes it difficult for it to provide reasonable accommodations for Ms Roberts whilst progressing towards its goal of expanding to other states. This point is invalid. In one of the two incidents case Ms Roberts refused to work beyond her contractual hours.

  2. There are four elements to a crime, a law, an offender, a target or ...

    and Wales without security measures were burgled compared with 4% of those with basic measures in place and 3% of those with higher levels of security. Research indicates that 72% of attempted burglaries failed because of the protection provided by basic security measures.4 The second method of crime reduction I will consider is Closed Circuit Television (CCTV).

  1. In this report I am going to be critically anaylising the changes that have ...

    Many consider that it is not a useful starting point upon which to built sustainable change, indeed for some, it 'polarizes rather than mobilizes. This part of the diverse strategy could have implications on the way in which people in the police force work because they are seeing this criticism

  2. Unilateral Divorce in Muslim Law

    date when the communication of talaq reaches her.[63] She can also claim maintenance from her husband till such time the communication of talaq reaches her.[64] TALAQ IN WRITING As has been stated earlier, the Sunnis recognise written talaq which may be in two forms: manifest talaq and unusual talaq.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work