• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  40. 40
    40
  41. 41
    41
  42. 42
    42
  43. 43
    43
  44. 44
    44
  45. 45
    45
  46. 46
    46
  47. 47
    47
  48. 48
    48
  49. 49
    49
  50. 50
    50
  51. 51
    51
  52. 52
    52
  53. 53
    53
  54. 54
    54
  55. 55
    55
  56. 56
    56
  57. 57
    57

Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Module 3 - Concept of criminal liability MENS REA - Guilty Mind ACTUS REUS - Act Done Mens Rea and NO Actus Reus = No Criminal Liability NO Mens Rea and Actus Reus = Strict Criminal Liability Basic criminal procedures Criminal: - * Arrested and charged by the police * CPS * Appear in Magistrates Court at 1st opportunity. Preliminary hearing (committal proceedings) The Defendant pleads guiltily or not guilty. Magistrates set a date for next hearing. * A date set for sentence or subsequent trial. Bail conditions set or rejected. Legal aid may be given. Magistrates may throw the case out because there is no case to answer. There are 3 criminal cases: - 1. Summary - Only ever heard in Magistrates Court 2. Trial Either Way - 1861 OAPA s47 ABH / Mode of trial hearing 3. Indictable - Serious offences heard in Magistrates then Crown The main functions of an Appeal court is to: - * Uphold the decision * Overturn the decision * Substitute a lower sentence * Substitute a lower offence * Order a retrial Judicial Precedent Law can be made in a court or be passed by Parliament. R v R 1991. This is a good example 1956 SOA Criminal Liability 1. THEFT ACT 1968 s1 "A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it; and 'theft' and 'steal' shall be construed accordingly." MR.: Dishonestly AR: Appropriation Intention to permanently deprive Property Belonging to another 2. ABSOLUTE LIABILITY R v Larsonneur 1933 STATE OF AFFAIRS CRIME - A French woman was deported to Ireland and then sent back to England. When she arrived in England she was prosecuted for being in England. AR: Set foot in England MR.: None Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent 1983 - Taken to hospital but discharged. ...read more.

Middle

Essex fails and gives these children to the fosterers. * Damage was foreseeable * Was sufficient proximity * Cant impose a duty of care to a public body 2. Legal Profession Rondel v Worsley 1969 - W makes a mess of the case and R tries to sue. Seen as not fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty Saif Ali v Sidney Mitchell & Co. 1977 - Established that you cannot sue a solicitor for his work IN court. Arthur J.S. Hall & Co. v Simons 2000 - HOL decided that previous decisions were wrong. Reversed the law to allow Barristers and Solicitors to be sued for in or out of court negligence. 3. Armed forces. Mulcahy v MOD 1966 - On exercises his ears where perforated. Whilst on duty your employer has no duty of negligence Rigby v Chief constable North Hampshire 1985 - Fired CS gas into a building. Meant to have fire brigade present but didn't. Building went on fire. Was just, fair, and Reasonable so not sued? 4. Fire brigade If they fail to do something, they may not be negligent. But if they do something negligent then they can be sued. John Munrowe v London FB 1966 - Put out fire but didn't check joining building which caught fire Capital & Countess PLC v Hampshire CC 1966 - FB turned off the sprinkler system which made the fire worse. This was an act and not an omission so it was fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty of care. 5. Coastguards OLC v Home Department 1997 - OLC (coastguards) It is worked out on if the coastguard has caused more damage by turning up than if they had not turned up. Test 2 - Breach of duty of care Whether or not the defendant has breached his duty is tested objectively, in other words not what the defendant thought he was doing, but what the reasonable person with the appropriate degree of knowledge would have done. ...read more.

Conclusion

Redland Brick Ltd won. Interlocutory Injunctions These are more difficult to obtain as they attempt to stop action before any damage has occurred. The claimant must prove to the court that there is a serious risk that damage will occur without the injunction. On the other hand, if the defendant can prove that no damage would have occurred the court may award damages against the claimant. Other sources of compensation So far we have assumed that a victim of crime or negligence may be able to claim compensation through the civil courts. In practice this may be impossible or impractical. 1. The person(s) responsible for the negligence may be unknown. E.g. 'hit and run' driver 2. The person(s) may be known but it is difficult to identify where the blame lies � Herald of free enterprise 3. The defendant may be liable but in no financial position to pay damages if they are awarded against him. 4. No legal aid for personal injuries except in medical negligence. Conditional fees known as 'No win, No fee' are only taken on when there is a very high likelihood that the claimant will succeed. Other Sources of compensation 1. State funded sources - Industrial injuries scheme are paid out of tax payer's money. Used in work cases. No payment is received for the first 15 weeks. 1 off payment for long term. 2. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board (CICB) - Ranges from �1,000 to �250,000. claim up to an additional �30,000 for loss of earnings 3. Insurance Companies - At work - Employers Liability Act 1969 Roads - Road Traffic Act 1988 Motor Insurance bureau 4. Following a highly publicised accident, funds are set up so that the public can contribute. Sometimes these funds can amount to 100's and 1000's of pounds resulting in significant payments for individual victims. End of Module 3 Started on 11th September 2001 Finished on 18th December 2001 Robert Cook Module 3 P. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "There is no statutory definition of intention in English law. Indeed, over the past ...

    5 star(s)

    Furthermore, the criminal law laid down in past cases does not define intent; it only provides guidelines on how a jury might tell when it is present; so the same facts might equally produce a conviction or acquittal depending on the make-up of the jury21.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law Omissions. In the English legal system there is generally no liability ...

    4 star(s)

    It must also be noted that an implied undertaking and then failing to look after that person will still amount to criminal liability which is illustrated in the case of Instan7. One of the leading cases in this field is Stone v Dobinson 19778, Stone and Dobinson in court were

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    they are the most affected people of crimes and they have significant contribution to the justice system. If meeting the needs of victims is one of the important concerns of the criminal justice system, it comes to another question- besides recognition and participation, what do victims really want?

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Analysis of the law relating to the offence of Murder and relevant offences of ...

    4 star(s)

    of expert testimony was to assist the judge and jury in assessing the defendant's responsibility and mens rea and understand the reasonableness of a woman's actions. "But expert testimony will not be a new scientific technique whose reliability is unproven".35 The defence of BWS has been refused in cases such as Moran v.

  1. Explain the role and functions of both the magistrate's court and the Crown Court.

    Some motoring offences carry mandatory sentences but generally the extent of the punishment is at the discretion of the magistrate and subject only to the maximum limits imposed by parliament, this has led to some disparity in sentencing. Magistrates can give sentences of up to six months and fine a person up to �5,000.

  2. Right to Silence. The privilege against right to silence and self-incrimination go hand in ...

    You must then be informed of the consequences of a failure or refusal to comply with the request, that is, you are committing an offence. The Garda must explain this in clear, ordinary and understandable language.

  1. Omissions in UK criminal law. The concept of omissions in criminal law pertains to ...

    R v Firth6 is a good example of breach of such duty. Now that we have established what amounts to criminal liability under the doctrine of omissions, we can try to understand why omissions are treated separately from normal acts - this might not make any practical difference to ones criminal liability.

  2. What happened to Aileen Wuornos? Why did she kill?

    indicted and charged in the shooting deaths of six middle aged males in Citrus, Colusia, Dixon, Marion, and Pasco counties in Florida. In 1992, she was convicted of murdering her first victim, Richard Mallory. Mallory had picked her up on a rainy night.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work