• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models Amara R. Serrano-Kirby CJA 320: Introduction to Criminal Justice University of Phoenix Abstract In order to understand the criminal justice system, you must first define it to so see if and how it works. The criminal justice system is broken down into two (2) models, the Consensus model and the Conflict model. I will try to define each system and explain how they achieve justice. The criminal justice system is comprised on three basic levels, policing, justice, and corrections. There are two models of criminal justice system which tries to explain how justice is achieved. The first model is the consensus model or the system perspective, which states that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should cooperate. The conflict model or the non-system perspective assumes that the organizations of a criminal justice system do, or should compete. In order to make a decision on either model, we will present the facts and examples on both to determine which model accomplishes its goal more successfully. ...read more.

Middle

The prosecution had a problem that was stemmed by the investigation, and the defense had a field day. Corrections did not even get their chance. Unfortunately, two people died and justification, if there is any, was even given to their poor families. The consensus model argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should work cooperatively to produce justice. I truly believe and would love to see a consensus model of criminal justice. All law enforcement which includes local, state, and federal agencies working together, sharing intelligence and resources to take down for example a mid-level heroin drug trafficking organization. Each level has their own area of "expertise." The state and local law enforcement know the area and have working contacts while the federal agents have the resources and jurisdiction if needed. As a unit they have included, conferred and worked with either the state or federal attorney's office to make sure the case and arrests qualify for the correct prosecution. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you have the consensus model on one side and the conflict model on the other I personally feel that currently the criminal justice system is working right down the middle. I see good and bad points with both models and in combining both models is where you will find a model that really works. Some groups argue that the conflict model is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the ideal. It would be safe to say that some Americans would agree that our current criminal justice system is broken. Most of the society and including myself are troubled with the fact that criminal are treated far better than their victims. So does crime pay? Of course not! Working in the "business" I have seen the extreme examples of both models. Law enforcement no matter what branch should support one another, but a little competition never hurt anyone. If keeps you sharp and performing to your best ability. http://www.encyclopedua4u.com/c/criminal-justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/conflict_model_(criminal _ justice) http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/dahmer1.shtml Consensus vs. Conflict 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    Instead of having the power to decide the sentences of offenders, the mediator's role is to smooth the negotiation progress and balance the power of the primary stakeholders in order to reach a mutually acceptable agreement on what the offender should undertake.

  2. Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

    Extent of the damage Under these rules: - 1. Defendant must foresee damage 2. Defendant only needs to foresee the general type of damage 3. Defendant does not need to foresee the extent of the damage This follows on from the criminal law: "You take your victim as you find him."

  1. Utilitarianism Vs Consequentialism

    Punishment, in the pure consequentialist system, will normally fall under one of three heads, deterrence, incapacitation and reform or rehabilitation, which can be examined in turn. Firstly, deterrence operates on the notion that the threat or imposition of a severe punishment for an offence will cause potential future criminals to refrain from committing an offence for fear of being reprimanded.

  2. The aim of this project is to explore and analyse the role of the ...

    * Victims Of Sexual Offences The grievances of victims of sexual offences especially rape are many and they take a number of forms. When the victim of rape approaches the police station she enters into the gateway of the criminal justice system where she is faced with interrogation, which leads

  1. At common law, the prosecution were generally prohibited from mentioning the accused's bad character ...

    Whether the evidence has sufficient probative value to outweigh its prejudicial effect must in each case be a question of degree. The view that some feature of similarity beyond what has been described as the paederast's or incestuous father's stock-in-trade before one victim's evidence can be properly admitted upon the

  2. The use of psychologists in the detection of criminals is more fictional than functional ...

    While the overall paradigm itself has not been empirically tested, many of the theories that contribute to IP have, in one example Canter and Kirby (1995) look at the conviction history of child molesters. This study investigated the validity of the common assumption that child molesters will have a history

  1. Outline the key features of the 'crime control' and 'due process' models of criminal ...

    1984, are reduced and more police power is granted (Bretherick, 2004, p. 4). The police in light of the crime control model play a key role in order to quickly eliminate those people who are probably innocent as a pose to those who are guilty. Tess Newton (1998, p. 58)

  2. On the Necessity of Justice: An Analysis of Plato's Republic.

    (Plato, p. 152-3) Another problem with Glaucon's argument is that its own assumptions make it irrelevant. The argument that Glaucon presents assumes that all men truly do not care for justice and only practice it out of fear of the consequences of not doing so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work