• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models Amara R. Serrano-Kirby CJA 320: Introduction to Criminal Justice University of Phoenix Abstract In order to understand the criminal justice system, you must first define it to so see if and how it works. The criminal justice system is broken down into two (2) models, the Consensus model and the Conflict model. I will try to define each system and explain how they achieve justice. The criminal justice system is comprised on three basic levels, policing, justice, and corrections. There are two models of criminal justice system which tries to explain how justice is achieved. The first model is the consensus model or the system perspective, which states that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should cooperate. The conflict model or the non-system perspective assumes that the organizations of a criminal justice system do, or should compete. In order to make a decision on either model, we will present the facts and examples on both to determine which model accomplishes its goal more successfully. ...read more.

Middle

The prosecution had a problem that was stemmed by the investigation, and the defense had a field day. Corrections did not even get their chance. Unfortunately, two people died and justification, if there is any, was even given to their poor families. The consensus model argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should work cooperatively to produce justice. I truly believe and would love to see a consensus model of criminal justice. All law enforcement which includes local, state, and federal agencies working together, sharing intelligence and resources to take down for example a mid-level heroin drug trafficking organization. Each level has their own area of "expertise." The state and local law enforcement know the area and have working contacts while the federal agents have the resources and jurisdiction if needed. As a unit they have included, conferred and worked with either the state or federal attorney's office to make sure the case and arrests qualify for the correct prosecution. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you have the consensus model on one side and the conflict model on the other I personally feel that currently the criminal justice system is working right down the middle. I see good and bad points with both models and in combining both models is where you will find a model that really works. Some groups argue that the conflict model is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the ideal. It would be safe to say that some Americans would agree that our current criminal justice system is broken. Most of the society and including myself are troubled with the fact that criminal are treated far better than their victims. So does crime pay? Of course not! Working in the "business" I have seen the extreme examples of both models. Law enforcement no matter what branch should support one another, but a little competition never hurt anyone. If keeps you sharp and performing to your best ability. http://www.encyclopedua4u.com/c/criminal-justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/conflict_model_(criminal _ justice) http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/dahmer1.shtml Consensus vs. Conflict 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    The mediators of RJC are facilitators rather than decision makers, therefore the decision making process will be vested in the hands of primary stakeholders. As what I have suggested before, providing affected parties of crime an opportunity to participate in the system is crucial to the stakeholders and the wider

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - A Miscarriage of Justice.

    4 star(s)

    So since neither prosecution nor defence thinks a double-S.I.D.S. is the explanation, the probability of double-SIDS is completely irrelevant to the case. The jury should have been directed most strongly to disregard any statistics relating to double-SIDS. During the trial the jury clung onto two things - Professor Meadow's flawed statistical evidence and Williams flawed medical evidence.

  1. Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

    Froom v Butcher (1976) F not wearing seatbelt reduced his damages by 25% at least and if it could have been proved that by wearing his seatbelt no injuries would be caused. Even if wearing a seatbelt you would have been injured but not wear a seatbelt, damages would be reduced by 15% Revill v Newberry (1991)

  2. Utilitarianism Vs Consequentialism

    Punishment, in the pure consequentialist system, will normally fall under one of three heads, deterrence, incapacitation and reform or rehabilitation, which can be examined in turn. Firstly, deterrence operates on the notion that the threat or imposition of a severe punishment for an offence will cause potential future criminals to refrain from committing an offence for fear of being reprimanded.

  1. The aim of this project is to explore and analyse the role of the ...

    to medical examination in an environment where she feels uneasy because the incident of rape is again brought on the surface of the mind of the victim, which is followed by harassment, delay and adjournment in repeated court appearances, insult at the hands of the defence lawyer and loss of earnings.

  2. The use of psychologists in the detection of criminals is more fictional than functional ...

    were coming to about the offender and in assisting them to understand the bizarre behaviour patterns of the criminals they were pursuing. Offender profiling, in all its various guises, is still very much a discipline that has yet to be accepted.

  1. At common law, the prosecution were generally prohibited from mentioning the accused's bad character ...

    The accused testified and gave an account of his movements which again involved his being with a prostitute and having had a long conversation with his wife when he returned home. The two conversations corresponded almost word for word. The disclosure that he had been tried previously in circumstances that

  2. Outline the key features of the 'crime control' and 'due process' models of criminal ...

    As Sanders & Young (2000, p. 22) explain 'speed can best be achieved by allowing the police to establish the facts through interrogation.......procedures must be uniform and routine, so that the model as a whole resembles a conveyer belt in its operation'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work