• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models Amara R. Serrano-Kirby CJA 320: Introduction to Criminal Justice University of Phoenix Abstract In order to understand the criminal justice system, you must first define it to so see if and how it works. The criminal justice system is broken down into two (2) models, the Consensus model and the Conflict model. I will try to define each system and explain how they achieve justice. The criminal justice system is comprised on three basic levels, policing, justice, and corrections. There are two models of criminal justice system which tries to explain how justice is achieved. The first model is the consensus model or the system perspective, which states that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should cooperate. The conflict model or the non-system perspective assumes that the organizations of a criminal justice system do, or should compete. In order to make a decision on either model, we will present the facts and examples on both to determine which model accomplishes its goal more successfully. ...read more.

Middle

The prosecution had a problem that was stemmed by the investigation, and the defense had a field day. Corrections did not even get their chance. Unfortunately, two people died and justification, if there is any, was even given to their poor families. The consensus model argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should work cooperatively to produce justice. I truly believe and would love to see a consensus model of criminal justice. All law enforcement which includes local, state, and federal agencies working together, sharing intelligence and resources to take down for example a mid-level heroin drug trafficking organization. Each level has their own area of "expertise." The state and local law enforcement know the area and have working contacts while the federal agents have the resources and jurisdiction if needed. As a unit they have included, conferred and worked with either the state or federal attorney's office to make sure the case and arrests qualify for the correct prosecution. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you have the consensus model on one side and the conflict model on the other I personally feel that currently the criminal justice system is working right down the middle. I see good and bad points with both models and in combining both models is where you will find a model that really works. Some groups argue that the conflict model is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the ideal. It would be safe to say that some Americans would agree that our current criminal justice system is broken. Most of the society and including myself are troubled with the fact that criminal are treated far better than their victims. So does crime pay? Of course not! Working in the "business" I have seen the extreme examples of both models. Law enforcement no matter what branch should support one another, but a little competition never hurt anyone. If keeps you sharp and performing to your best ability. http://www.encyclopedua4u.com/c/criminal-justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/conflict_model_(criminal _ justice) http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/dahmer1.shtml Consensus vs. Conflict 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    However, it has been criticised by Barton (1996) that these programmes are poorly funded and 'are not usually associated in any way with the judicial processing of the offence which resulted in the injury'. (Strang, 2001: 184) Although these reparation schemes have been improved in recent years, they are only

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Justice, Miscarriages of justice

    4 star(s)

    They added that despite the quashing of convictions, "It does not follow that the appellant is innocent of the charge brought against him or that he has served 11 years' imprisonment for a crime which it has been found he did not commit."

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - A Miscarriage of Justice.

    4 star(s)

    So since neither prosecution nor defence thinks a double-S.I.D.S. is the explanation, the probability of double-SIDS is completely irrelevant to the case. The jury should have been directed most strongly to disregard any statistics relating to double-SIDS. During the trial the jury clung onto two things - Professor Meadow's flawed statistical evidence and Williams flawed medical evidence.

  2. Outline the key features of the 'crime control' and 'due process' models of criminal ...

    In other words for suspects who are in an unfortunate position unable to afford a lawyer then public funds should be made available to that person in order for equality of opportunity to be upheld. The due process model is illustrated as being similar to an obstacle course, where the

  1. Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

    Trial judge stated - The school should have provided supervision Appeal stated - Most primary schools don't supervise end of day It could have easily have happened outside the school gates The school consequently had not fallen below the standard required.

  2. The aim of this project is to explore and analyse the role of the ...

    is to be treated courteously, kept informed and consulted about all stages of the process. They involve treating the victim as a more equal partner. That, however, would imply a greater emphasis on the role of the victim, and potentially, less emphasis on the role of the offender and that of the legal profession.

  1. At common law, the prosecution were generally prohibited from mentioning the accused's bad character ...

    Evidence of previous similar acts would rebut a defence of accident as in Smith.22 In 1915 the defendant was tried for the murder in July 1912 of Beatrice Mundy by drowning her in the bath. He had been through a bigamous form of marriage with her in 1910 and she believed herself to be his wife.

  2. On the Necessity of Justice: An Analysis of Plato's Republic.

    like everyone else, and we all know that we will do what is advantageous. To be stated more clearly, if none of us care for justice then we will not carry out some silly charade of trying not to look unjust, we will just do what we have to do

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work