• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models.

Extracts from this document...


Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models Amara R. Serrano-Kirby CJA 320: Introduction to Criminal Justice University of Phoenix Abstract In order to understand the criminal justice system, you must first define it to so see if and how it works. The criminal justice system is broken down into two (2) models, the Consensus model and the Conflict model. I will try to define each system and explain how they achieve justice. The criminal justice system is comprised on three basic levels, policing, justice, and corrections. There are two models of criminal justice system which tries to explain how justice is achieved. The first model is the consensus model or the system perspective, which states that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should cooperate. The conflict model or the non-system perspective assumes that the organizations of a criminal justice system do, or should compete. In order to make a decision on either model, we will present the facts and examples on both to determine which model accomplishes its goal more successfully. ...read more.


The prosecution had a problem that was stemmed by the investigation, and the defense had a field day. Corrections did not even get their chance. Unfortunately, two people died and justification, if there is any, was even given to their poor families. The consensus model argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should work cooperatively to produce justice. I truly believe and would love to see a consensus model of criminal justice. All law enforcement which includes local, state, and federal agencies working together, sharing intelligence and resources to take down for example a mid-level heroin drug trafficking organization. Each level has their own area of "expertise." The state and local law enforcement know the area and have working contacts while the federal agents have the resources and jurisdiction if needed. As a unit they have included, conferred and worked with either the state or federal attorney's office to make sure the case and arrests qualify for the correct prosecution. ...read more.


If you have the consensus model on one side and the conflict model on the other I personally feel that currently the criminal justice system is working right down the middle. I see good and bad points with both models and in combining both models is where you will find a model that really works. Some groups argue that the conflict model is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the ideal. It would be safe to say that some Americans would agree that our current criminal justice system is broken. Most of the society and including myself are troubled with the fact that criminal are treated far better than their victims. So does crime pay? Of course not! Working in the "business" I have seen the extreme examples of both models. Law enforcement no matter what branch should support one another, but a little competition never hurt anyone. If keeps you sharp and performing to your best ability. http://www.encyclopedua4u.com/c/criminal-justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/conflict_model_(criminal _ justice) http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/dahmer1.shtml Consensus vs. Conflict 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    Why does the exiting system fail to reintegrate offenders? The reason why sentences in the existing system give little attention to reintegration of offenders is because it is 'retribution justice' oriented. It demands offenders to repay to the society by punishment- this is, an eye for an eye concept (Zehr, 1990: 146), and reintegration is out of the scope of this system.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Justice, Miscarriages of justice

    4 star(s)

    They added that despite the quashing of convictions, "It does not follow that the appellant is innocent of the charge brought against him or that he has served 11 years' imprisonment for a crime which it has been found he did not commit."

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - A Miscarriage of Justice.

    4 star(s)

    of the children were due to their being smothered, even though initially they had suggested shaking as the cause of death. The retraction and revision of their opinion concerning the cause of death came after being challenged by a pathologist for the defence regarding flaws in their evidence.

  2. At common law, the prosecution were generally prohibited from mentioning the accused's bad character ...

    defendant would lie in court was unrelated to a previous conviction for dishonesty. It seems that the standard judicial instruction is not only hard to understand, but also asks jurors to confine their reasoning to a form that does not come at all naturally.

  1. Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

    Hospital can't diagnose the injury and sends him home. 5 days later he goes back. Find things wrong. Sued for deformities that he is suffering from. Medical experts said there was a 25% chance that the deformities were as result of the 5 days.

  2. The aim of this project is to explore and analyse the role of the ...

    and interests so that the path to justice for the victim of rape is smooth and speedy. Right of Privacy of Rape Victims In State of Punjab v. Gurmeet Singh23 the Supreme Court of India held that the trial of rape cases must be done invariably in-camera rather than in open court as envisaged Section 327(2)

  1. The media's perspective on crime and the resultant fear of crime.

    factors, and more importantly, the criminal justice institutions form a near monopoly as source of crime news in the media and the dependency with them on news production, it is difficult for media to be refrained from their definition of crime.

  2. Utilitarianism Vs Consequentialism

    Punishment, in the pure consequentialist system, will normally fall under one of three heads, deterrence, incapacitation and reform or rehabilitation, which can be examined in turn. Firstly, deterrence operates on the notion that the threat or imposition of a severe punishment for an offence will cause potential future criminals to refrain from committing an offence for fear of being reprimanded.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work