• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Consensus vs. Conflict Criminal Justice Models Amara R. Serrano-Kirby CJA 320: Introduction to Criminal Justice University of Phoenix Abstract In order to understand the criminal justice system, you must first define it to so see if and how it works. The criminal justice system is broken down into two (2) models, the Consensus model and the Conflict model. I will try to define each system and explain how they achieve justice. The criminal justice system is comprised on three basic levels, policing, justice, and corrections. There are two models of criminal justice system which tries to explain how justice is achieved. The first model is the consensus model or the system perspective, which states that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should cooperate. The conflict model or the non-system perspective assumes that the organizations of a criminal justice system do, or should compete. In order to make a decision on either model, we will present the facts and examples on both to determine which model accomplishes its goal more successfully. ...read more.

Middle

The prosecution had a problem that was stemmed by the investigation, and the defense had a field day. Corrections did not even get their chance. Unfortunately, two people died and justification, if there is any, was even given to their poor families. The consensus model argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should work cooperatively to produce justice. I truly believe and would love to see a consensus model of criminal justice. All law enforcement which includes local, state, and federal agencies working together, sharing intelligence and resources to take down for example a mid-level heroin drug trafficking organization. Each level has their own area of "expertise." The state and local law enforcement know the area and have working contacts while the federal agents have the resources and jurisdiction if needed. As a unit they have included, conferred and worked with either the state or federal attorney's office to make sure the case and arrests qualify for the correct prosecution. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you have the consensus model on one side and the conflict model on the other I personally feel that currently the criminal justice system is working right down the middle. I see good and bad points with both models and in combining both models is where you will find a model that really works. Some groups argue that the conflict model is the reality of criminal justice, but the consensus model is the ideal. It would be safe to say that some Americans would agree that our current criminal justice system is broken. Most of the society and including myself are troubled with the fact that criminal are treated far better than their victims. So does crime pay? Of course not! Working in the "business" I have seen the extreme examples of both models. Law enforcement no matter what branch should support one another, but a little competition never hurt anyone. If keeps you sharp and performing to your best ability. http://www.encyclopedua4u.com/c/criminal-justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/conflict_model_(criminal _ justice) http://www.bbc.co.uk/crime/caseclosed/dahmer1.shtml Consensus vs. Conflict 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Personalism-impact on victims and how Restorative justice conference can balance the interest of victims ...

    4 star(s)

    community because it has the potential to create empowerment and recognition of victims thus helping them restore dominion. If there is no active participation of primary stakeholders and other members of the community in the criminal justice system, these benefits and goals can never be achieved.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Justice, Miscarriages of justice

    4 star(s)

    Supporters of the campaign to clear his name included the comedian Jeremy Hardy. In February 1999, McNamee read the IRA Roll of Honour at the Burns and Moley commemoration and the following month he sat with the Caraher family during the trial of Michael Caraher and other members of the Provisional IRA South Armagh Brigade sniper team.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - A Miscarriage of Justice.

    4 star(s)

    they thought it was murder. Also, the defence agree that the two deaths were not S.I.D.S. They say that Christopher's death was recorded by the doctor, as lung infection, which would mean it was not SIDS; and Harry's death was caused by bacterial infection, which would mean it was not SIDS.

  2. At common law, the prosecution were generally prohibited from mentioning the accused's bad character ...

    The study does not even touch on the likely effects of a defendant's race on the way previous convictions are interpreted. These are all questions that require further research. In addition, as mentioned earlier, the simulation method has inherent limitations as well as advantages.

  1. Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

    Uses his girlfriend as a body shield and police shoot her Pagett fails 3. Negligence by the victim R v Holland 1841 - Damaged victims hand. Hospital advises that the hand is removed. Victims hand deteriorates and victim dies Holland fails R v Blaue 1975 - B stabs a female Jehovah witness.

  2. The aim of this project is to explore and analyse the role of the ...

    is to be treated courteously, kept informed and consulted about all stages of the process. They involve treating the victim as a more equal partner. That, however, would imply a greater emphasis on the role of the victim, and potentially, less emphasis on the role of the offender and that of the legal profession.

  1. Utilitarianism Vs Consequentialism

    Punishment, in the pure consequentialist system, will normally fall under one of three heads, deterrence, incapacitation and reform or rehabilitation, which can be examined in turn. Firstly, deterrence operates on the notion that the threat or imposition of a severe punishment for an offence will cause potential future criminals to refrain from committing an offence for fear of being reprimanded.

  2. Classical school Vs Positive school.

    He proposed that the system should incorporate the techniques of punishment to fit the crime, be a deterrent at best and should be proportionate to the harm done in society. (181). Beccaria's "punishment to fit the crime" advocacy was made towards the social dimension (legal and administrative reform)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work