• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the significance of the court's judgment in Case C-376/98 'Tobacco Advertising' [2000] ECR I-8419 for the community's legislative powers.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

2. Consider the significance of the court's judgment in Case C-376/98 'Tobacco Advertising' [2000] ECR I-8419 for the community's legislative powers. On October 19th 1998, the Federal Republic of Germany brought an action for the annulment of a directive relating to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products. This case gave the court an opportunity to consider the legislative powers the community may or may not exercise. The German government brought a complaint before the Court of Justice on several grounds, the basic of which, was Article 100a1 of the Treaty was not the appropriate legal basis for the Directive. Article 95 prescribes that: "The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, adopt the measures for the approximation of the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administration in Member States which have as their objective the establishment and functioning of the internal market". This means that directives can be approved if there is a need of harmonising the law in order to establish or improve the functioning of the internal market. If that is true, the issue is genuinely a European one. ...read more.

Middle

national rules to continue to exist, without the concomitant benefit of allowing free circulation for products or activities which met the Community rules. However, the rather sweeping general comments about not using Article 95 to ban an activity do raise the general issue about whether that provision can be used to replace a legitimate national prohibition. The legislative powers the Community may exercise are regulated by the rules bestowed on it by the various Treaties. These rules were themselves set up by the member states (rules that came from their different constitutional traditions) and given for the community to apply. This means that whatever the approach the member state in question has towards the community it is always restricted by the Treaties, as it is the Treaties that dictate the range of the member states' powers. But who is to decide whether one member state has abused its power? This arbitrary role is given to the European court of Justice, this body is there to prove that the community does not possess universal legislative power. Article 5 of the Treaty of the Maastricht Treaty states: "The Community shall act within the limits of the powers conferred upon it by this Treaty and the objectives assigned to it therein."7 These ...read more.

Conclusion

of its effects on human health constituted a measure in the 'phytosanitary'10 field which had as its direct objective the protection of public health. It has long been established that a general power cannot be used to regulate a matter falling clearly within the domain of a more specific provision, so that the general Article 308 could not be used to enact legislation falling within the reach of the common commercial policy under Article 133, and general powers cannot be used to evade the detailed requirements of a more specific power. In conclusion one may notice that it is the constant task of the court to strike the correct balance between respect for the legislative role and judicial control to ensure that the Community does not exceed its powers at the expense of the Member States. 1 Now article 95 of EC 2 Par 83, 'Tobacco Advertising' [2000] ECR I-8419 . 3 Par 85. 'Tobacco Advertising' [2000] ECR I-8419 4 Par 95. 'Tobacco Advertising' [2000] ECR I-8419 5 Par. 111. 'Tobacco Advertising' [2000] ECR I-8419 6 Case C-300/89, Commission v. Council, [1991] ECR I-2867 7 Treaty on European Union. (Maastricht Treaty). 8 Case C-376/98. 9 Article 152. EC. 10 J. Usher, Casenote, (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review 1519. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    What is the meaning of the term 'measure equivalent to a quantitative restriction' for ...

    4 star(s)

    Despite this clear distinction between what will and will not be a MEQR, the distinction drawn in Keck between rules that go to the nature of a product and and those that relate to the selling arrangements is problematic. There seems to be an area of uncertainty as to what

  2. The Luxembourg Compromise is, in fact, an agreement in case very important national interests ...

    1992 deadline the Act provided that rules on unanimity within the Council should be relaxed, and replaced by majority voting. However, Member States such as the United Kingdom, France and Denmark6, in Parliamentary debates regarding the Act, made specific declarations that the Luxembourg Compromise was not effected by any provisions in the Act.

  1. Reform of the ultra vires rule: A personal view.

    in a contractual relationship and each is an agent of the others. According to a contractual concept of the company, the memorandum and articles of association are a contract and the directors are agents of the company. However, the analogy is not exact, as the contract created by the memorandum

  2. Free movement of capital and payments. Although the 1957 Treaty of Rome included ...

    And in particular noted that Article 58(1)(a) is limited by Article 58(3) [now Article 65]. 7.2 In Verkooijen13, the ECJ commented that this provision effectively codified the approach that it had taken in Schumacker and Bachmann, which permits Member States to protect the coherence of their internal taxation system.

  1. Is there sufficient democratic accountability in the EC legislative process?

    ability to act by themselves and enact legislation (although in limited areas) is undemocratic- having not been elected. Although it may be thought that as the Commission consists of members from the Member States it would allow for democratic accountability, it must be noted that the Commissioners are to be independent (Article 213 EC)

  2. FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS WITHIN EU

    Finally, the goods must not have benefited from a total of partial drawback of such duties or charges. Example Company A in France imports Tuna cans from Thailand and has already paid the common customs duties in France. If Company A wants to export these tuna cans to Germany, it

  1. What was the relationship between the Factortame case and the Treaty of Rome 1957?

    - The provision that may be made under subsection (2) above includes, subject to Schedule 2 to this Act, any such provision (of any such extent) as might be made by Act of Parliament, and any enactment passed or to be passed, other than one contained in this part of

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    This is contrary to Community law. Article 23 EC provides that a Customs Union will be achieved by, inter alia: (b) the prohibition between member states of customs duties on imports and exports and of all charges having equivalent effect.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work