• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract case reading exercise.

Extracts from this document...


Contract case reading exercise The claimant in this case is named Rebecca Jane Edmonds born on the 1 November 1968 at the time of the case she was aged 31. She graduated from Oxford with a degree in English and worked within the information technology industry for sometime before deciding to become a lawyer. She undertook a M.A course at the University of Kent at Canterbury. Following this she studied for the common professional examination at the University of Westminster. Edmonds did a number of mini pupillages and successfully found herself at the Inns of Court school of law. During her year there she decided to pursue a career at the criminal bar. After contacting a number of chambers specialising in crime she was invited to an interview at Mr. Lawson's' chambers at 23, Essex street, a large and highly regarded set of criminal chambers. Edmonds was offered by the head of the chambers an unfounded 12-month pupilage at the chambers on 21st Aug 1998. Michael Lawson was sued by claimant Rebecca Edmonds on his own behalf and behalf of all the members of chambers, at 23 Essex Street London the ...read more.


This case was heard in the Queens Bench Division by a claim dated 28 July 1999 by the claimant Edmonds. The Queens Bench Division is an administrative division, which forms part of The High Court of Justice. It has the greatest workload and deals with some criminal jurisdiction and some appellate jurisdiction. The main civil work of this court is in tort and contract cases. Lord Bingham of Cornhill CJ deals with the issue of 'was there a contract?' He states the judge held that there was a contract between the claiment Edmonds and Lawson and others. Chambers on 1 October 1998. This is based on the chambers offer of a 12 month pupillage and Edmonds acceptance of the offer. The first issue of whether there was a contract referred to by Lord Bingham wishes to disclose whether there was any consideration furthermore did the parties intend to enter into legally binding relations. Lord Bingham of Cornhill analyses intentions to create legal relations in this case. He looks at the defendant's point of view of writing an offer of pupilage to the claiment, stating that this offer was made after a long time consuming and expensive process. ...read more.


The judge also states that the pupil has freedom to practise provisionally not for the benefit of the chambers but for the sole benefit of the pupil themselves. The judge found there was not a contract for purposes of the minimum wage act; the claiment did not fit into the category of this act. Devilled work is carried out by a devil; this is a barrister to whom another barrister passes work because he is too busy. To devil someone is to do unpleasant or boring work for them. The claimant's case was rejected due to a contractual dispute. The argument was that the contract between the claiment (Edmonds) and the defendants (Lawson and others) was one whereby the claiment undertook the duty of work for any assigned pupil master as might be requested by her during her pupilage. The two legislative measures that are considered in this case are The National Minimum wage Act 1998 and the regulations of 1999. These were used to establish whether the claiment fitted into the category of a 'worker'. These can also be referred to as statutory instruments, which is any delegated legislation to which the statutory instrument Act 1946 applies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Contract Exercise.

    However, Nettie needed a more formal agreement in order to consider relocating and starting a new life in Bisbee. An offer must contain a specific promise and specific demand. The language of the offer must be clear and concise. Acceptance Nettie is truly concerned about her uncle and is considering the move.


    Honour Clauses - Express stipulation in the agreement that it is not intended to be legally binding - make an agreement unenforceable at law Jones v Vernon's Pools Ltd Facts - the plaintiff sued on a football pools coupon which he alleged he had posted and the defendants had lost

  1. Advanced Contract and Tort.

    the contents or effect of a clause inserted by it into a contract cannot rely on the clause of the misrepresentation. Obviously Kevin misrepresented the first clause but the company may still be exempted from liability if the second clause is found to be valid.

  2. Legal Relations

    Before elucidating on that point, more fundamental pieces to the enigma of the law of contract in the light of this topic have to be stated succinctly. The intention [to create legal relations] is determined by a 'policy presumption.'

  1. Whether the contract that Amy entered into with FCD would bind SCL?

    [Ref case: Ashburry Railway Carraige and Iron Co. v Riche (1875) LR 7 HL 653] 2 The original purpose of Doctrine of Ultra Vires was to protect the shareholders and creditors. But under this section the other party who engaged in a contract with the company who was breaching its

  2. Dick and Ed - case for compensation.

    If Dick can successful prove that this is a sale by description. The effect of s. 13 will be that there is an implied condition that the goods will correspond with the description. The refrigeration unit was of 15 tonnes instead of 20 tonnes which may constitute a breach of the implied condition.

  1. This executive summary deals with the Marilyn M. case.

    With the introduction of the Marilyn M. product, Ashleigh diverges away from their previous selling scheme, offering retailers only a sixty-six percent markup. Ashleigh Cosmetics implements strong product placement displays along with advertisements in several high-circulation women's magazine. One promotional aspect of Ashleigh Cosmetics is that they do not guarantee

  2. Law of Contract - analysing a case.

    This shows that they are making an offer rather than just an invitation to treat as they say in the advertisement "offer to pay you £500 to anyone who used it (according to the instructions) for a period of three months, and either failed to stop smoking or suffered any ill effects attributable to their product".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work