Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Contract Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contract Law Coursework 2001-2002 Introduction This scenario presents different aspects of Contract Law, though the underlying points made are that consideration must not be past, identifying the offer and acceptance in a contract and the use of estoppels. A contract is a legally binding agreement enforceable in a court of law. However, not every agreement between two parties is a legally binding contract. The law imposes certain requirements on contracts. The fundamental requirements for forming a binding contract are: * offer * acceptance * consideration The first part of the scenario clearly identifies a simple offer and acceptance. Tim offers Mary to repair her bike and she accepts. This now creates a contract between Tim and Mary. Each contract requires an offer and acceptance of that offer. "... to constitute a contract, there must be an offer by one person to another and an acceptance of that offer by the person to whom it is made. A mere statement of a person's intention, or a declaration of his willingness to enter into negotiations is not an offer and cannot be accepted so as to form a valid contract"1 An offer must be an understandable, explicit and direct approach to another party to contract. For this reason, advertisements, catalogues or store flyers are not offers. Nor is a "for sale" sign on a used car. The law calls these "invitations to treat"; essentially invitations to the general public to make an offer on a particular item. ...read more.

Middle

Tim cannot then ask for money for his past deeds, as again, past consideration is not valid under contract law. Yet, if this argument is still taken, then the opposition could disagree, by using the case of Dawson v Helicopter Exploration Co. (1955). This case illustrates how acceptance can be made by conduct, and not necessarily by stating ones acceptance of an offer. Therefore by doing the safety check on the bike, it could be argued that Tim was showing his acceptance of the new offer made by Mary, to include the safety check in the original contract for £100. With this argument Mary will only be liable to pay Tim £100 at the most, as his kindness is taken as a gift. Tim cannot claim for the £10 for the safety check, as that action was completed in the past, and as we are aware, past consideration is not legitimate4. The cases of Roscorla v Thomas and Re McCardle restate this point. It should be noted however that the courts have attempted to mitigate the sometimes harsh effect of the of past consideration rule by way of the implied assumpsit doctrine5. This doctrine was formed in order to alleviate the operation of the rule against past consideration where the act done by the promisee was at the request of the promisor and the promisor only promises to pay the promisee after the latter has completed the act requested - Lampleigh v Braithwait. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lord Scarman in Pao On v Lui Yu authoritatively stated the modern ambit of the rule. For a promise given after an act was done, to be legally enforceable three elements must be present: 1) The act of the promisee must be done at the promisor's request. 2) The parties must have understood that the act was to be remunerated by a payment or the conferment of some other benefit, and 3) The payment, or the conferment of benefit must have been legally enforceable had it been made in advance (i.e. the other elements necessary to make a binding contract must all be met). Lampleigh v Braithwait (1615) Hob. 105. Thomas Braithwait had killed Patrick Mahume. In desperation he asked Anthony Lampleigh to do all that he could to get a pardon for him from the King. Lampleigh acted upon this request riding between London and Newmarket at his own expense. Afterwards Braithwait promised Lampleigh £100 for his trouble. He failed to pay it. Lampleigh sued. One of the arguments used by Braithwait was that Lampleigh's consideration was past - the act was complete before the promise to pay £100 had been made. The Court rejected this argument - stating that where the act of the promisee had been done in response to a request by the promisor, subsequent to which the promise to pay had been made then it was possible to unite the request and the promise and treat them as part of the same transaction. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. The Main Requirements of a Simple Legal Binding Contract - Law of Contract.

    Once Madame Poussard was well again, her services were declined. The court found that failure to sing on the opening night was a breach of conditions, and so the producer was entitled to treat the contract as discharged. Bettini v Gye - an opera singer had signed a contract under which he would sing at a series of performances.

  2. Before Katie enters into a contract with her builders its important that she is ...

    c) Warranties - are the minor term that gives the innocent party the right to apply to damages. Whether a term is minor or major is crucial and is often at the basis of legal disputes. Bettini v Gye 1876 Case: Bettini agreed by contract to perform as an opera singer for a three month period.

  1. What are the advantages of a bill of exchange over other methods of payment?

    This can be argues to have created an exception to the well-known rule in contract law that past consideration is no consideration.6 Also the consideration need only be unilateral and need not move from the promisee. More importantly to our discussion is the ability to evade the privity rules7.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Of all of the elements which make up the definition of theft, which are ...

    3 star(s)

    and therefore asks that dishonesty be defined by law rather then allow the jury to decide. However if a jury is a selection of the reasonable honest members of society then why shouldn't they be allowed to decide over what constitutes as dishonest?

  1. Offer and Acceptance Case. Advise Angus, Bruce and Colin whether they have a ...

    Therefore, the postal rule cannot be used as the contract canât be valid or established when posted but when received. This is similar to Eliason v Henshaw (1819), where âDefendants sent an offer to the plaintiffs to buy flour, and they prescribed that acceptance should be made via the plaintiff's delivery wagon.

  2. Jack wants to have a conservatory built in his house. He writes to three ...

    'consists either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to the party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other.' Professor Tritel has made a helpful clarification, 'The traditional definition of consideration "something of value" must be given and according states that consideration

  1. contract law

    secondly, it would also mean that the contract of sale is entered into upon the customer selecting the goods and the customer would not be able to change his mind even though he has not paid for the goods or approached the payment counter c)

  2. Contract law - review of cases.

    the itemâs value and the acceptance from the husband is an action buying the item. There is an argument that the advertisement here is an invitation to treat. However, there was a same case in which the court held the advertisements as offers, such as the case Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893).

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.