• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Coporate Law and Limited Liability. There are certain circumstances in which courts will have to look through the corporation, that is, lift the veil of incorporation, otherwise known as piercing the veil, and hold the shareholders of the company directly

Extracts from this document...


Introduction A corporation under Company law or corporate law is specifically referred to as a "legal person"- as a subject of rights and duties that is capable of owning real property, entering into contracts, and having the ability to sue and be sued in its own name. In other words, a corporation is a juristic person that in most instances is legally treated as a person, and empowered with the attributes to own its own property, execute contracts, as well as ability to sue and be sued. One of the main motivations for forming a corporation or company is the limited liability it offers its shareholders. By this doctrine (limited liability), a shareholder can only lose only what he or she has contributed as shares to the corporate entity and nothing more. Nevertheless, there is a major exception to the general concept of limited liability. There are certain circumstances in which courts will have to look through the corporation, that is, lift the veil of incorporation, otherwise known as piercing the veil, and hold the shareholders of the company directly and personally liable for the obligations of the corporation. The veil doctrine is invoked when shareholders blur the distinction between the corporation and the shareholders. It is worthy of note that although a separate legal entity, a company or corporation can only act through human agents that compose it. As a result, there are two main ways through which a company becomes liable in company or corporate law to wit: through direct liability (for direct infringement) and through secondary liability (for acts of its human agents acting in the course of their employment). The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil varies from country to country. ...read more.


These separate legal identities are protected by the veil of incorporation, which can only be disregarded by the courts in particular circumstances. A company once incorporated becomes a legal personality, separate and distinct from its members and shareholders and capable of having its own rights, duties and obligation and can sue or be sued in its own name. This is commonly referred to as the principle of corporate personality and it carries with it the concept of limited liability. No case illustrated the above principles better than the noted House of Lords decision in Salomon v. Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]. However, in some circumstances, the courts have intervened to disregard or ignore the principle of corporate personality and limited liability. Thus, if a corporation gets sued, only assets of the corporation can be collected to a judgment. If the corporation is insolvent, its debts may go unsatisfied, and creditors are out of luck. They can't go after the assets of those who own the company. It is this separate legal personality that makes companies an attractive vehicle for commercial ventures, as the liability rests with the company, rather than the shareholders, directors, members or company officers. The separate legal entity forms the basis for limited liability of shareholders. Shareholders' liability is limited to the value of the shares allotted to them. This separate legal personality has the consequence that a company has perpetual succession. Its legal existence survives its shareholders and directors. Its existence is ended when it is wound up pursuant to the Companies Acts. Example 1: Salomon v Salomon and Co [1897] Salomon (S) ...read more.


While banks and similar financial creditors easily overcome such risks, the same cannot be said of trade creditors, employees and tort creditors. Because trade creditors rarely insist on security before they supply goods on credit, they bear a considerable part of the risk of corporate insolvency. Employees are in an even more precarious position. In stark contrast to finance and trade creditors, employees have no opportunity to obtain security or diversify the risk of their corporate employer's insolvency. Moreover, the majority of employees have minimal information about their employer's financial standing. While contract creditors bear a degree of risk when they deal with a limited liability company, they at least enter into the contract by their own will. This is not so for a company's tort creditors. Victims of torts committed by a company bear an uncompensated risk in case of the company's insolvency. Conclusion The act of piercing the corporate veil until now remains one of the most controversial subjects in corporate law, and it would continue to remain so, even for the years to come. By and large, as discussed in the essay, the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil remains only an exceptional act orchestrated by courts of law. Courts are most prepared to respect the rule of corporate personality, that a company is a separate legal entity from it's shareholders, having it' own rights and duties, and can sue and be sued in it's own name. As we move from jurisdiction to jurisdiction across the globe, it's application narrows down to how that system of the law appreciates the subject. Common law jurisdictions are examples par excellence where the piercing of the corporate veil has gained notoriety, and as the various cases indicate, courts under this system of the law generally appreciates every case by it's merits. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Commercial Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Commercial Law essays

  1. Corporations in law. A corporation under Company law or corporate law is specifically ...

    However, since little proprietorship owes their existence exclusively to one person, the term now applies to proprietorships as well. Shareholders Shareholder is an owner of shares in a company. Due to the principle of separate legal personality, a shareholder does not own any assets of a company, but rather own shares.

  2. The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd has be watched ...

    Since most shares are issued, fully paid up shareholders have, effectively, no liability for the company's debt. Separate legal personality allows a company to sue and be sued in its own name, to hold property in perpetual succession distinct form the property of members, to issue freely transferable shares, to

  1. Company law - directors duties

    This therefore supports the view that the director must exercise independent judgement therefore restating the existing principles. By allowing the possibility of limiting or fettering the director's discretion to act or to take decisions, the CA2006 imports from decided cases12 the commercial reality that recognises that it may be appropriate

  2. Limited liability

    members of closely held businesses to have the right to enjoy limited liability, provided that these kinds of companies are willing to submit to the formalities of the Companies Act.6. The meaning of limited liability is that, in case of insolvency, shareholders are under no obligation to the company or

  1. Company Law. This report aims to look into the unique feature of the company ...

    As a separate legal entity a company can own its own properties where the members does not have direct right to it. It has full contractual capacity to make contracts and can also be held liable for any breach. A company can also be subject to crime subject to the limitations as follows; 1.

  2. In the following group assignment, we will be carrying out the role of a ...

    (Donoghue v Stevenson) 1932. A business which does not manufacture the defective goods or sell them to the consumer may nevertheless find itself liable to compensate a consumer who suffers loss because of defect in the goods, because it's a producer. In order to success in a claim, the claimant must show that, ?

  1. The World Trade Organization and Its Critics

    This meeting is attended by ambassadors and heads of delegations in the domicile of the WTO where it converges several times a year. Representatives of other member states may be allowed to partake in the proceedings of the Council. Surveillance of national trade policies is an important activity throughout the operations of the WTO.

  2. Veil of Incorporation. Under the Companies Act 2006[1], the effect of registering a ...

    was distinct from its members and so could therefore owe money to its members. The decision in Salomon has become the foundation for the judgment of many cases with regard to upholding the veil of incorporation. For example, in Macaura v Northern Assurance Co,3 Macaura attempted to claim under an

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work