• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminal Law,dealing with the subject of murder and how applying the general principles of criminal law will help us in deciding an outcome

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Criminal Law LR2S07 This essay will be dealing with the subject of murder and how applying the general principles of criminal law will help us in deciding an outcome. To begin with murder can be defined as 'a common law offence, which is the unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen's peace with malice aforethought.'1 It is important to establish whether Mens Rea and Actus Reus are present. In most cases is an act of crime because the person committing it intended to do something wrong. This mental state is generally referred to as Mens rea, or guilty mind. Mens rea expresses a belief that people should be punished only when they have acted in a way that makes them morally blameworthy.2 The Actus Reus is a guilty action, which may not necessarily involve intent. The main facts of the case are as follows: John was a Carsea United supporter, he brought three flares to the match with he planned to release into the crowd to disrupt the match is the opposition, Swaniff City, were in the lead. After half time, Swaniff City were clearly leading so John decided to release the flares. ...read more.

Middle

Referring to the cases of Malcherek (1981) 1 WLR 690 and Pagett (1983) 76 Cr App R2799 if Pablo's death was caused by a combination of the two causes and Johns act remains a significant cause then he will be liable. Pablo's unfortunate situation at the hospital can be taken into account by discussing how his treatment may have contributed to his death. The Oxford Journal of Legal Studies states that the courts are unwilling as a matter of policy to find that medical treatment has broken the chain of causation when it follows an initial unlawful act by someone else. The case of Jordon (1956) 40 Cr App R 152 no longer has much strength on its outcome as the case of Smith (1959) 2 QB 35. The Court of Appeal has subsequently confirmed the approach taken in Smith, indicating that Jordon has practically no relevance any more, except in the most 'extraordinary or extreme'10 case. It is evident from looking at these cases that the chain of causation will virtually never be broken by medical negligence and that the law will follow this rule as set down in Smith and as applied recently in Cheshire (1991) ...read more.

Conclusion

2) Did John foresee it as virtually certain to occur? Taking these questions into account, John did point the flares at the Swaniff fans, 'whom he hates passionately'. These two questions only apply when there is not direct intent, after analysing the facts, one can say that John did see some sort of damage to occur and it can be said that the consequence of someone getting hurt was a virtual certainty, but the notion of intent to kill may not have been present. Section 18 OAPA 1861 states that wounding or GBH which must be inflicted 'maliciously', but the word 'maliciously' means foresight of the consequence. John must have had to have foreseen a risk and recklessly gone ahead and taken it. Intention to cause grievous bodily harm, but not to cause death, is sufficient to establish the mens rea for murder. John, if found reckless, would be faced with manslaughter. Caldwell [1982] C 341 has been overruled by the House of Lords in R v G and Another [2003] UKHL 50 and now a subjective test for recklessness applies to criminal damage. In conclusion, John is not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter. Oblique intent can be said to exist or be capable of existing when John saw the consequence as certain or virtually certain as a result of his actions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A good essay, addressing the key issues and cases. Some of the finer points have been overlooked, however.

4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 07/08/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "There is no statutory definition of intention in English law. Indeed, over the past ...

    5 star(s)

    The HoL substituted the word 'infer' for 'find' as to 'infer' suggested that intention was something different from the foresight itself, but did not specify what it was.20 But what about when the accused knows that a result is virtually certain to occur but intended the opposite, e.g.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Chain of causation problem question. The given case is concerned with the law ...

    4 star(s)

    The victim was aware of the consequences of injecting drugs. This breaks the chain of causation. It is therefore unlikely that Albert will be convicted for any criminal offence with respect to the death of Bert. He might however be charged under the Misuse of drugs act 1971 (c.38)

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Art and part liability

    4 star(s)

    This can be seen in the doctrine of art and part liability. An individual may become art and part guilty of a crime as a result of personal conduct, however, his criminal liability is dependant upon the actions of another person.

  2. Explain the difference between direct intent, oblique intent and subjective recklessness in English criminal ...

    However, a jury is also entitled to find intention where a defendant did not desire the result, but it is a virtually certain consequence of the act, and the accused realises this and goes ahead anyway.

  1. Critically assess the impact of the way in which media and politicians represented the ...

    Official response is that anyone found guilty of murder committed when under the age of 18 must be sentenced to 'detention during Her Majesty's pleasure'. Currently, a person convicted of murder that is aged 18 or over at the time of the offence but is under 21 on conviction must be sentenced to 'custody for life'.

  2. Annotated Bibliography - Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States

    "Criminal Disenfranchisement and the Challenge of American Federalism." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39.3 (2009): 527-556. Academic Search Premier. Web. 27 Feb. 2012. In the article, Ewald reviews recent developments in the American felony disenfranchisement laws. The variables' that play a deciding role in a state's likelihood of enacting reform is examined.

  1. Outline the key points of New Right criminology. Critically analyse the impact it has ...

    People are acting for themselves taking a stand and trying to provide for themselves and families, not depending on the state to help them. After 1979 we can see very new right attitudes towards how british society should be run, and so in turn we see how crime should be dealt with.

  2. After Woollin, the law of Intention remains unclear, but nonetheless works in a satisfactory ...

    However, one thing that is clear and certain is that intention is a subjective concept and this has been confirmed by that of the section 8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967[13], after the case of DPP v. Smith[14], where it was clear that a objective approach resulted in a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work