• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criminal Law Omissions. In the English legal system there is generally no liability for an omission to act, the English legal system does not have a good Samaritan rule neither is there no duty of easy rescue.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the English legal system there is generally no liability for an omission to act, the English legal system does not have a 'good Samaritan rule' neither is there 'no duty of easy rescue'. Fitzjames Stephen gave a classical example of 'A seeing B drowning and is able to save him by holding out his hand. A abstains from doing so in order that B may be drowned, A will have committed no offence.'1 This example clearly shows that there is no positive duty for B to act, even though B holding his hand out may have saved A's life. This is a controversial issue as the law allows one to watch a person drown without them being prosecuted for any offence. However in some European countries this is different such as in France and Germany where there is a duty of easy rescue and failure to do so will amount to a criminal offence2. As I have earlier said generally there is no liability for failing to act, however there are six exceptions and if a person fails to act then they will be committing a criminal law offence, there is a vast amount of case law in this field which will be used to illustrate the exceptions to an omission. The first exception I will discuss is a special relationship, this is where the law will require an individual to act where there is a special relationship, it is generally recognised the more closer the relationship the more likely the law will impose a duty. ...read more.

Middle

her own room, she would not eat and keep herself locked in for days at a time, Stone and Dobinson tried to find her doctor but with no luck, Fanny's condition meanwhile was getting worse and Stone and Dobinson did not have the capacity to solve the issue, they asked a neighbour Mrs Wilson to help wash Fanny, they even asked her to help find a doctor and make calls but still no attempt was successful, Stones Sister passed away and Stone and Dobinson were found guilty of manslaughter because of an omission , as they had not taken proper care of Fanny. A case like Stone and Dobinson, the verdict may seem unfair to punish a couple of clearly low capacity to even look after themselves let alone Stones ill sister. The issue could have been resolved with social services intervention who failed to keep an eye on this family, Lord Lane CJ made it clear that as the family had tried to feed her and also care for her then they must be responsible, as they had voluntarily assumed duty. Another time when there is a duty created for one to act is a 'duty to avert danger created', the law will impose a duty on a defendant to act to avert danger that he has created, even if it was an innocent mistake the law will require the defendant to avert this danger, a hypothetical example could ...read more.

Conclusion

or should it be the conventional view which Williams favours and not save B. Ashworth also believes that the whole society will benefit from a duty of easy rescue.21, he also believes that liability should be limited to those who had a greater opportunity to save B. Professor Williams however believes this will not work, as what will happen if 50 people watch B drown, will all of these people be liable? Sending 50 people into court would be a huge logistical issue and would certainly clog up the courts system. In 1980 there was an effort to reform the law on omissions by the Criminal Law Revision Committee who wanted to iron out the controversial issues and make the law more simpler and straightforward by only imposing omissions for murder, manslaughter, causing serious injury (gbh), kidnapping and abduction. The Law commission in 1989, 9 years after this report proposed a general provision on omissions which would not be limited to the crimes in the 1980 report by the Criminal Law revision committee. And they wanted generally to add causation more into the Actus Reus of the crimes and also tie in the omissions element, to make the law more straightforward. However these reports were published more than 2 decades ago, and the law on omissions remains unchanged and it is likely it will remain this way for the foreseeable future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Well done.

This student really understands the six categories of omissions-based conduct that might amount to criminal behaviour.

To improve the mark, the student should make reference to less commonly cited, and recent, case law.

High 4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "There is no statutory definition of intention in English law. Indeed, over the past ...

    5 star(s)

    The virtual certainty test was later affirmed in R v Woolin19 with some minor modifications setting the current test of oblique intent. A prominent modification made related to the direction which told the jury that 'they are not entitled to find the necessary intention, unless they feel sure that death or serious bodily harm was a virtual certainty.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - Problem Question - Homicide

    4 star(s)

    property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence"37. All four elements to the actus reus of the offence are present in relation to Alan's act as he did cause damage to property by shooting at the expansive vase which then shattered and the act was unlawful.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Chain of causation problem question. The given case is concerned with the law ...

    4 star(s)

    Gross Negligence manslaughter is where there was a duty of care owed to the victim, the duty of care was breached and death occurred and the breach of duty needs to be gross (serious). Firstly it needs to be established whether Albert owed a duty of care to Diane.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law,dealing with the subject of murder and how applying the general principles of ...

    4 star(s)

    includes whatever circumstances and consequences are required for liability for the offence. Therefore a positive physical act is required, John pointed the flares towards the opposition teams fans that we are told he hates passionately. This can be seen as a result crime as Pablo, who John's flare hits, does not die immediately.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    criminal law assignment

    4 star(s)

    This constitutes the mens rea to burglary and as a result Alan would be held liable under section 9(1)a of the Theft Act 19689. Alan may also be liable as a secondary party to murder and rape. A secondary party is someone who helps bring about a crime without being the actual perpetrator10.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Case Note - Stone & Dobinson 1977. The details contained in this case are ...

    3 star(s)

    Dobinson to wash Fanny and food was taken to her by Mrs. Dobinson as she required it. It was also said that there was ample evidence that both appellants were aware of the poor condition she was in by mid-July. This was not a situation analogous to the drowning stranger.

  1. What was the impact of the decision of R v G and R?

    taking into consideration, individual characteristics which weren't present before in the Caldwell test. As mentioned above, one can note that the House of Lords decision in RvG illustrated criticism thus conveying a negative impact of the case. This can be seen as the RvG case only overrules the objective test

  2. problem question on murder

    The jury must be satisfied that Ali's act was serious enough to unbalance the behavior of Boris as a reasonable man with reasonable self control (Smith (Morgan))23, and the question is that; was it a reasonable level of self control for him?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work