• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critical Evaluation of The Companies Act 2006 and its comparison to The Companies Act 1985

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Companies Act 2006 aims to ensure that a company can operate with more flexibility and choice. The Companies Act 1985 was extremely regulated and facultative; 'Company law developed mainly with the public company in mind. The provisions that apply to private companies are often expressed as an exception to the provisions applying to public companies, making them difficult to understand.'1 The aim of the new act is to create clearer and less structured regulations that private companies can understand and adapt to the way in which they wish to operate. The simpler articles of association and the de-regulated approaches in which company decisions can be made in theory create a less structured and more efficient basis on which a company can function and reflect modern business requirements. The directors of a company are responsible for the general running of a company and as such they are expected to make decisions on a regular basis e.g. appointing a chairman of the board and buying or selling Company assets. Board meetings are the forum in which they make their decisions and each must be evidenced by keeping minutes of all the decisions made. Minutes are a legal requirement. Any director can keep minutes of meetings under the new act. The CA 1985 required all companies to have a company secretary but that provision has been removed. However, a company may wish to amend the Default Articles to require that a company secretary be appointed. ...read more.

Middle

Default Article 46 set out the information which must be given when appointing a proxy in a private company. Under this article a company may require that proxy notices be delivered by a specific means of communication and may specify different forms for different purposes. There is a rule under s327 which states that a company cannot require notice of a proxy any earlier than forty eight hours before a meeting is to take place. This provision ensures that if a member finds he cannot attend a meeting 'last minute' then he can appoint somebody in that forty eight hour time slot. Any longer than that would be not be fair or practical as a member may find he cannot attend a meeting only a day or two before it is due to take place. If the minimum requirement for appointing a proxy was one week for example, then that member would not have the opportunity to exercise his voice during the meetings. A proxy is not able to vote by show of hands but does however have the ability to demand a poll vote under s282 (3) CA 2006, providing the member he or she is representing holds at least ten per cent of the shares. This is a highly significant provision as if a majority shareholder was unable to attend a meeting, he or she could still be assured that a resolution they were not in agreement with could not pass, as the fact they hold more shares ...read more.

Conclusion

It could be argued that such a restructuring would contravene the requirement for notice of a meeting but if all members/directors were present and able to assent to a decision being made then surely one amalgamated forum would provide for a more slick, resourceful and practical form of decision making. If the provision stated that the consolidation of the meetings was only to be used where directors and members were the same then the requirement for notice need not be contradicted, as it would still take place in larger companies where the directors and members were not identical. The CA 2006 has however failed to make such a provision, and as such directors who are members are required to go through the lengthy three staged decision process which can be deemed completely unnecessary. Although the Companies Act 2006 has brought about many changes to create a more efficient and clear approach to how companies in England and Wales operate, there are still some 'loose ends'. It can be said the new act has brought about a complete upheaval, especially considering the amendments of the articles of association, but upon closer examination the decision making process is still long winded and over regulated in many respects, e.g. the aforementioned decision making process of directors who are members. Although the new act can be criticised it has brought a forward change in the running of companies. It presents a step in the right direction in removing the more archaic and regimented provisions, although there is still a long way to go in perfecting the way in which company decisions are made. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Commercial Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Commercial Law essays

  1. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY & ITS IMPACT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

    organisations, which are primarily directed to the pursuit of profit and characterised by formal structures and rules that limit the moral autonomy of decision-makers.'23 However there are indications that this role is changing. The opportunities for corporations to contribute to the global protection of the environment are increasingly in the spotlight.

  2. Reform of the ultra vires rule.

    and that it imposes on persons who enter into business transactions with companies a burden of enquiry in respect of matters where the risk of irregularity should be borne by the company and not by the other party to the transaction.

  1. Memorandum of association

    The House of Lords in the much-celebrated ASHBURY RAILWAY CARRIAGE AND IRON CO LTD V RICHE first demonstrated its application to such companies. The company entered into a contract with riche, affirm of railway contractors to finance the construction of a railway line in Belgium .The company however repudiated the contract as one ultra vires.

  2. In the current financial crisis, the directors of stricken UK financial institutions run as ...

    As well as this criteria for selection there is call for further development by the OECD steering group in 2010 to make sure the directors 'remain abreast of relevant new laws, regulations and changing commercial risks through in-house training and external courses.'

  1. There are three legal functions of a bill of lading; 1. ...

    the goods with a quick visual inspection of the Bill itself, therefore no confusion or wrongful passage of the goods should occur. The use of Bill of Lading forms mean that there will be a high degree of uniformity, this means that even with the vast differences in language and

  2. Free essay

    Legal Environment - Popeye v Spinach Tankers Ltd. The appellant claimed damages under the ...

    So, the evidential test has been satisfied. In order for Steven to be prosecuted, it would be determined whether the prosecution of Steven's offence would be in the public interest. Factors for and against prosecution must be considered, and to aid this decision, the Code lists factors that should be

  1. Veil of Incorporation. Under the Companies Act 2006[1], the effect of registering a ...

    He formed a company which he then sold the property to. This case demonstrates forming a company with an improper motive to prevent having to respect the original agreement to transfer the property and so the company was deemed 'sham' or 'fa´┐Żade,' as a result of this the courts lifted the veil of incorporation.

  2. Separated legal personality means shareholders and directors of the company are not liable for ...

    In Re F.G. (Films) Ltd, US company incorporated UK company with no assets and no employees to produce a film to take advantage of certain legislation in the UK. The court considered UK company to be agent of US company.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work