• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically analyse Police powers on Stop and Search, Arrest and Detention.

Extracts from this document...


Critically analyse Police powers on Stop and Search, Arrest and Detention The report carried out by Lord Scarman included several recommendations about reforming the law, community relations and policing practices to help tackle the central problems which caused civil disorders. As part of these recommendations, Lord Scarman advocated a system for members of the public from local communities to inspect the way the police detained people in their custody. Originally referred to as lay visiting, independent custody visiting is the system that has been developed to meet this recommendation At the time, the majority of the Scarman Reports' recommendations, found favour with the opinion makers and were included in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act which was made law in the mid-1980. This act of parliament set out the way in which the police officers must carry out their roles and stated specific codes of practices for police procedures. It also established the rights of people who are detained by the police for a suspected crime or offence. Police powers to stop and search are contained in s.1-7 of PACE, though there are other statutes such as the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 which gives the police powers to stop and search people in connection with particular offences. S.1 of PACE 1984 gives police officers the right to stop and search a person or a vehicle in a public or a place to which the public have access, provided that the police officers have reasonable grounds to suspect that they will find stolen or prohibited articles. The term "reasonable grounds" is based on the objective test, based on what an ordinary person may think is reasonable. The power of stop and search is legal only if a reasonable person would suspect that there are stolen or prohibited articles to find, meaning that police officers cannot randomly stop and search people if they feel there is a possibility that they might find a prohibited article. ...read more.


The custody officer may also authorise a search to the extent considered necessary and a detainee must be searched by officer of the same sex. At this stage, the Custody Officer can inform the detainee of the decision to detain them and the reasons for this and must record them on the Custody Record. After detention is authorised, the detainee is informed of his or her rights: free legal advice, have someone informed of their arrest, and consult a copy of the Codes of Practice. The detainee is also provided with a copy of those rights and a notice of their entitlements/conditions of detention. Once detained, there are limits on detention. A person can be held up to 24 hours without charge, this may be extended to 36 hours with Superintendent's authority, the court may also authorise up to 96 hours. Reviews of detention are carried out periodically, 6 hours after detention and subsequent reviews at 9 hour intervals. Before a charge is bought, the duty inspector acts as the reviewing officer and after a charge the custody officer fulfils this role. After enquiries are completed, the detainee must be released (unless certain conditions apply) either with or without bail. Otherwise, if there is sufficient evidence, the Custody Officer may authorise a charge. All studies on the impact of PACE point towards the idea that it was exceptional for the custody officer to refuse to allow the detention of suspects. It is possible to argue the fact that a Custody Officer is unlikely to refuse to allow a suspects detention owing to solidarity with the arresting officers. The "solidarity" aspect of the Custody Officers role is stressed by McConville et al, The suspect's right- The right to legal advice. One of the aims of PACE was to provide balance between the police's rights and the rights of the detainees'. The most important right provided by PACE was the right to legal advice. ...read more.


He then changed his story yet again saying he was telling the truth at the trial and the only reason he said otherwise was because he wanted publicity. Due to Thompson's incompetence the COA quashed Stone's conviction and ordered a re-trial. Fortunately Stone was convicted and sent for life imprisonment. There are also many other cases which illustrate the miscarriages of justice another being the Birmingham 6. If the prosecution proposes to give in evidence confession evidence made by the accused person, there might be a possibility that the evidence was obtained under oppression. If this is the case then to court will render the evidence unreliable, and will not allow the confession given against him. Section.76 of PACE considers "oppression" to be torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, and the use of threat or violence. "Oppression" was defined in the case of Fulling 1987 as an "exercise of authority or power in a burdensome harsh or wrongful manner; against or cruel treatment of suspects". Unreliable evidence may also be excluded from the courts under s.78 of PACE, which allows the court the choice to prohibit evidence where its use would have an "adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings" Despite s.76 and s.78 there is evidence that points towards courts still allowing unreliable evidence to pass through the courts. An illustrative example was in the case of Paris, Abdullahi and Miller 1992 (Cardiff 3). In this case the main evidence against one of the defendants was confession evidence during police interrogation. Miller was interviewed by the police for 13 hours over a period of 5 days. During this time he denied being involved with the murder of the prostitute over 300 times, until he finally admitted being at the scene of the crime. The COA quashed the convictions of all three relying on s.76 and s.78 of PACE. Therefore the COA held that the questioning was oppressive and the confession given by Miller could not b used as evidence as it was gained through oppression. PACE 1984 Asma Patel 72d ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Ethics in practice

    Mr Stannard was sent to prison for four and a half years on 9 February 2001, and his estate stripped of what assets could be recovered. However, the Bar Council, acting upon its own archaic rules did not choose to immediately disbar him.

  2. Is there an equal balance between the rights of suspects and the powers of ...

    In 1984 the 'Police and Criminal Evidence Act' (P.A.C.E.84) came into force. This was meant to give an equal balance between the rights of suspects and the power of the Police. The act was set in different chapters, each of these was to deal specifically with one particular issue.

  1. Stop and Search

    For example, under the Police Reform Act 2002, s.50 a uniformed police officer can require a person who has behaved in an anti-social manner to give their name and address. Failure to comply is an offence and may form the basis for an arrest under s.

  2. Following the McPherson report and subsequent Race Relations Amendment Act 2000 there is no ...

    It is understood by Macpherson that it is not the character of the contact between mostly white officers and black people in law-enforcement situations but rather the relationships which that white officer chooses to embark on outside the police force48.

  1. Describe the ways in which individuals are protected when detained, interviewed and searched at ...

    In addition, it must be tape recorded to make sure the interviewing officers are using the correct manner and also to have the interviews on record for anything in the future. During a case in 1999 Canale, whose case it was had his interviews rejected from the court as they

  2. law of evidence

    among Ravishers, Forgers and Incendiaries; ...Thieves often have a grey iris and in stature ...are inferior to Highwaymen and Murderers. Scanty beards are rare".7 In the eighteenth and nineteenth Centuries, equally exotic claims were made for Physiognomy,8 and Phrenologists were convinced that criminal tendencies could be read in the bumps

  1. Discuss by reference to the government's response to the threat posed by terrorism.

    that is compatible with the general principles laid down by the rule of law, which should stem from morals of society buttressed under the Human Rights Act 1998. Thus when parliament enacts legislation that is contrary to the general principles enshrined by legislation such as the Human Rights Act of

  2. Separation of powers

    he or she may return it to the LegCo within three months for reconsideration. If the LegCo passes the original bill again by not less than a two-thirds majority of all the members, the Chief Executive must sign and promulgate it within one month, or act in accordance with the provisions of Article 50 of this Law[4].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work