• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess the enforcement actions by the Commission brought upon the French government; the relevant TFEU articles need to be considered and the effectiveness of the use of secondary sources of EU law. Decision is the most pertinent secondary source and articles 258, 288 and 260.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

EU COURSEWORK In order to critically assess the enforcement actions by the Commission brought upon the French government; the relevant TFEU articles need to be considered and the effectiveness of the use of secondary sources of EU law. Decision is the most pertinent secondary source and articles 258, 288 and 260. This will be examined in greater detail and supported or refuted throughout with relevant arguments. A decision being most pertinent, under article 288 of the TFEU ?a decision shall be binding on its entirety. A decision which specifies those to whom it is addressed shall be binding only on them.? There this shows that any decisions the commissioner wishes to make, it is mandatory upon a member state to implement the request. Therefore as the commission had lifted the ban on importing poultry, the French government nevertheless, still continued to ban poultry importation. As there is a continuation of the breach of the law then the commission is entitled to take the relevant procedure to ensure effective remedy is available. C-387/97[1] is Greece failed to comply with the necessary obligations made by the commission as there was uncontrolled tipping of waste and subsequently the Commission was seeking damages. ...read more.

Middle

Case-240/86[2] is where there was a possibility of a breach relating to free movement of goods and Greece refused to give consent to the Commission to investigate. Subsequently as well as issuing procedure under 258 to investigate and prosecute, the Court of Justice also held that Greece was in fact in breach of article 10 of the EC. Secondly, this provides that, ?If the Commission considers...it shall deliver a reasoned opinion...may bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union.? This states that it does not have to carry out a formal investigation but it is best to see if there is recognition of a breach. As the second stage is normally the formal notice which is if the issue is not resolved then a letter of communication is sent to the state concerned, in this case the French government, specifying the grounds of the breach. Furthermore, the commission does allow a 2 month time limit in which it can observe or the state in question can offer a defence. As it can be seen in Case-51/83[3]it is an essential procedural requirement. Finally, the reasoned opinion is the final pre-litigation period. ...read more.

Conclusion

as in the Case- 439/99[11] as this reaffirmed that it was inadmissible for the Commission to bring the case before the Court of Justice. Furthermore, if the obligations imposed on upon the member states have failed as in the Case- 382,383/92[12], this is where the UK failed to implement the working time Directive of the EU treaty provisions before the time limit and ended in breach of this law, the Commission may therefore move swiftly onto infringement proceedings. Therefore this proceeds to a judicial stage. The way in which this works is that the statement of the reasoned opinion cannot be challenged but if the case does go to referral; to the Court of Justice it is considered to be ?de novo?. This means that the administrative stage has to be repeated if the member state is found to be in breach and therefore reaches the judicial stage and the court of justice will enter a ?Declaratory Judgment.? ________________ [1] Commission v Greece ([1992] ECR I-2509) [2] Greece v Commission [3] Commission v Italy [4] Commission v Italy [5] Commission v Italy [6] Commission v Italy, [7] Same as footnote 6, paragraph 13 [8] Commission v France [9] Commission v Belgium [10] Commission v Italy [11] Commission v Italy [12] Commission v UK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. EU institutions

    The exclusive right of the Commission is power of legislative initiative, which consists of the following elements: 1. Exclusive right of the bill introduction to the Council. 1. Right of the Commission to make alterations to the bills, projects anytime.

  2. With reference to the works of two or more comparative lawyers and other sources, ...

    Especially in common law, the discovery proceedings previously referred to can escalate into cost-intensive as well as time-consuming proceedings.5 An additional advantage of arbitration is that, unlike court proceedings, the matter of the dispute is confidently in the sense that it is not accessible to the public.

  1. FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS WITHIN EU

    This can imply that the Community is now concerned not only trade but also social matters. The name of European Union(EU) has begun to appear to the international community since then. Basically, the European Union is based on three pillars.

  2. Company Law and Corporate Governance

    It must be noted that some of the Company Law Directives were abandoned relatively early on whilst others are still not being implemented but are under review38. This period of development has been characterised as the early stages of harmonisation39.

  1. This article will critically assess the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector ...

    The idea is to provide safeguards for subscribers against intrusion of their privacy by unsolicited communications for direct marketing purposes in particular by means of automated calling machines, fax machines and emails including SMS messages. For example, the use of a Cookie in a website offering travel itineraries may help

  2. What was the relationship between the Factortame case and the Treaty of Rome 1957?

    parte:Factortame Ltd and others[1996] EUECJ C-46/93, [1996] 2 WLR 506, [1996] IRLR 267, [1996] QB 404, [1996] ECR I-1029, CaseC-46/93, [1996] CEC 295, [1996] All ER (EC) 301, [1996] 1 CMLR 889 [87] John Wheeler, Essentials of the English Law System (2nd Edn, Pearson Education Ltd, Ldn 2006)

  1. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    enforced against a defaulting Member State as set by the Van Duyn Case: It would be incompatible with the binding effect attributed to a directive by Article 189 (now 249) to exclude in principle the possibility that the obligation which it imposes may be invoked by those concerned.

  2. Annotated Bibliography - How the EU works and History.

    Interrogation theories of European Union provides explanations of the different stages and patters of development. The aim of the different stages and patterns of development. The aim of European Union to achieve intergovermentlism by peaceful means.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work