• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Demonstrations, Limited by POA leglislation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A demonstration is a bastion of constitutional and democratic influence. It goes beyond simply proving a point or highlighting awareness, it is a symbolic expression of freedom. This so called "people power" has the ability to change and influence the laws which are binding on our society. Within the United Kingdom protest is very much in vogue. A marked contrast to the direct action approaches favoured in the latter half of the 1990's.1 Events such as the War in Iraq and the G20 summit have hit the headlines as protestors disrupted London.2 With the eyes of the world watching such events unfold policing is a different task and has subsequently seen controversial tactics deployed.3 A constant balancing act must be maintained between the rights of the protesters to protest, property owners and the greater good. This is further clouded as a distinction between peaceful and violent protest is hard to distinguish. With the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 we have for the first time a codified protection of civil liberties linked to this expression. The most relevant provisions being Article 11, "everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly" and Article 10 which states, "everyone has the right to freedom of expression..." ...read more.

Middle

163 J.P. 789, to refer to a "constitutional shift."9 Sedley LJ was anticipating the certainties that the HRA would define via the defined expression granted under the breach of the peace. The articles provisions guaranteed a benchmark standard; this would depart from the heavy focus on public order which is constrictive to rights under the breach of the peace. The anticipated "shift" was evident since the subsequent introduction of the HRA as was seen in the case of Laporte v. Chief Constable of Gloucestershire [2006] UKHL 55, [2007] 2 W.L.R 46.10 This case is now the authority regarding breach of the peace powers. It is important to review this case before looking retrospect at the development pre-HRA, in previous judicial rulings. The facts of Laporte centre on a lady travelling via a bus to a planned protest against the war in Iraq. As the police feared that some of the party were planning violence the buses were ordered to return. The previous view was under breach of the peace preventative steps could be taken if reasonable, even in the light of breaches which were not imminent. The House of Lords affirmed the provision of article 10 and 11 of the HRA and stated that imminent breaches must be apparent before any action can be used which contravenes articles 10 and 11. ...read more.

Conclusion

This contrasting opinion does not adhere to the proportionality test used in Laporte, if it had done so the entrapment of innocent protesters and bystanders would have fallen within article 5. 1 Bryant, B. Twyford Down: Roads, Campaigning and Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 1996) 2 www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/03/g20-protests-police-tactics, 3rd April 2009, Accessed 1st August 2010 3 Mead, D. Of kettles, Cordons and Crowd Control - Austin v. Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and the meaning of "deprivation of liberty" (European Human Rights Law Review 2009) 4 Hubbard v. Pitt [1976] QB 142 (at p.176) 5 Stone, R. Civil Liberties and Human Rights. 7th edition (Oxford 2008) 7.1.3 6 Stone, R. Civil Liberties and Human Rights. 7th edition (Oxford 2008) 7.1.3 7 Steel & Others v. UK (1999) 28 EHRR 603. P.36 8 Lecture Paper given February 2000, Cambridge public law conference 9 Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions (1999) 163 J.P. 789 10 Laporte v. Chief Constable of Gloucestershire [2006] UKHL 55, [2007] 2 W.L.R 46. 11 Ziliberberg v. Moldova, App. No.61821/00, P.4 12 Piddington v. Bates [1961] 1 W.L.R. 162. 13 Moss v. McLachlan [1985] I.R.L.R 76 14 Duncan v. Jones [1936] 1 KB 218 15 Fenwick, H. Marginalising human rights; breach of the peace, "Kettling", the Human Rights Act and public protes. (Public Law 2009) ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932].

    As far as the direct obligation of the consignor to the carrier is concerned, it has been put upon an implied warranty, Brass v. Maitland (1856) 6 E & B 470; 26 LJQB 49; 27 LTOS 249; 119 ER 940, but it is also a duty owed independently of contract - eg, to the carrier's servant, Farrant v.

  2. Critically appraise the following judgment:Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers [2004] UKHL 22

    Already we see a similarity in findings and the issue of reasonable expectation arising. The important case that was once again cited was that of A v B7, this particular case demonstrates a significant development within civil law as

  1. Racial Profiling by Police

    and even if there is no marijuana found in the vehicle containing Hispanic people, the rangers should still "FI" (field interrogate) the occupants (pp. 37). This would be an instance when it would be valuable to have the back-up data demonstrating that such events truly do take place and against which legal action could be initiated.

  2. The right to freedom of expression is probably the most universally accepted human right.(2) ...

    [T]he facts of the case...did not cease to be a matter of public interest merely because they formed the background to pending litigation. By bringing to light certain facts, the [Sunday Times] article might have served as a brake on speculative and unenlightened discussion."(22)

  1. Critique of Arminius' Exposition of Romans 7.

    to sound in the present tense, as if it were applicable to him at the time he wrote it. However, a close examination of the text shows that this is a common Hebrew way of thinking and speaking. In the Preface to Young's Literal Translation of the Holy Bible, the

  2. The UK laws relating to obscenity and public outrage unduly hamper an artist's freedom ...

    Then one will have to evaluate these provisions in the light of the public liberty "freedom of expression" in a second part (III) II. The legal provisions made by the UK law A. Concerning Obscenity (Statutory Offences) The law on obscenity aims at protecting those who come to it willingly,

  1. Civil Liberties

    England history indicates that when church and state are linked, all individual freedoms are in jeopardy. Arguments for Religious Freedom � Many of the founding fathers believed that the spiritual purity and sanctity of religion would be ruined if it mixed with the worldly realm of politics.

  2. The HRA 1998 has had little impact upon protecting the basic liberties of the ...

    a breach of article 6 (right to fair trial), of the ECHR, but that there was no breach of articles 2 (right to life), and 8 (right to privacy). So it was not until the ECtHr intervened that the appellants got justice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work