• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the relevance of the concept of the rule of law to current constitutional arrangements in the UK

Extracts from this document...


"In the mouth of British Constitutional Lawyer, the term "rule of law" seems to mean primary a corpus of basic principles and values, which together lend some stability and coherence to the legal order". (TRS Allan). In the light of the quote above, I am going to discuss the relevance of the concept of the rule of law to current constitutional arrangements in the UK. I will be looking at the current constitution in the UK, the doctrine of the rule of law and the relevance of the doctrine in the operation of state power. The UK is said to have an "unwritten constitution", because it has no single codified documentary constitution. However most of the constitution does exist in the written form of treaties, statutes and court judgements. Due to the absence of a formal written constitution in the UK, there is no positive statement of the basic principles governing state actions and no guidelines that could be used to assess the legitimacy of government action. Lawyers and politicians have used the concept of the rule of law in order to provide such a measure.1 The rule of law is capable of being interpreted differently by different people. It is a recognised principle of the English constitution, which is frequently used to signify a notion of "law and order". ...read more.


By the rule of law, all laws should be clear and open. In Merkur Island Shipping Corpn v Laughton12 1983, Lord Diplock stated "absence of clarity... encourage those who wish to undermine" the rule of law. The source of power has to be pointed out according to the courts. Referring to the first factor of Dicey's rule of law he mentions powers, this poses a problem when trying to define the powers. An example of this can be seen when trying to define 'arbitrary power' it could be interpreted to mean a power that can be abused if it is not protected by adequate controls and checks. Also it could be interpreted to mean powers that have a direct impact upon individual rights. A case that expounds this is Liversidge v Anderson13 [1942] where the home secretary assumed he had the belief that a detention without warrant was justified. If the first definition of arbitrary powers were used then the rule of law would not apply to our constitution, which is reliant on delegation, arbitration and control through report and review. The rule of law does in fact apply to every modern democratic constitution, but just in slightly different ways. Sir Ivor Jennings a prominent critic of Dicey, mentioned a weakness of his definition, "they (Dicey etc) ...read more.


Although he does say decisions should be made in accordance to procedural fairness, he is more concerned about regular enforcement and application rather then content. Writers have now began to expand the concept by including these issues (Delhi Declaration 1959).20 In conclusion complying with the rule of law may provide a check on abuse of power. It may provide a critical evaluation of how the power is used. Alone it is not a comprehensive code but must be used alongside other principles, which regulate the content of the legal rules. It can be argued that the rule of law is too vague, if the law is written down on paper it would be more accessible and easier to understand and obey. On the other side codification would require unnecessary money, time and effort what is the point on devising a remedy for something that works in the first place? Finally there are many interpretations of the doctrine of the rule of law, each having slightly different connotations. We all put into practice the principles of law everyday so we do have a basic idea what the law entails. Dicey's principle of the rule archaic, the general principle is still intact and forms part of the British Constitution today. It's the upholding of morality, faith and reasoning in the judiciary that gives the rule its eternal constitutional relevance rather than written rules. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Public Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A very well structured essay. The points are thought out carefully. A greater emphasis on current examples would improve the grade.

4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 06/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Public Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Parliamentary sovereignty. " Step, by step, gradually but surely, the English principle of the ...

    4 star(s)

    Furthermore, the Supreme Court Judges are able to set aside Acts of Parliament and contradict the Act in their verdict. The contention that parliamentary sovereignty is, has and will continue to be qualified can be best summed, in the words of Lord Hope: "Our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament.

  2. Compare and contrast written and unwritten constitutions. Which type of constitution do you favour?

    This gives it some degree of flexibility, but could also be seen as a lack of security. The government can include entrenchment clauses in an Act or statute, but this can still be repealed simply by passing another statute to do so.

  1. We are presented with a question finding its roots in the Judicial Review area ...

    A big argument for the proportionality test is the aligning of our Administrative law with other European jurisdictions and EU law, in which the proportionality test finds its roots. Now looking at arguments against a takeover of the proportionality approach, I will note the concession in a later edition of

  2. In this essay I will define the constitution, its main elements and its aim. ...

    This is known as " Sevell conventions". Moreover they also have an effect on legislation of the member states of the Commonwealth.11 Furthermore conventions affect the Cabinet and Prime ministers and the relationship between civil servant and Ministers. By the conventions accountability is increased and ministers became publicly accountable to parliament.

  1. 'The House of Lords should be abolished. The UK only needs one chamber of ...

    The UK's constitution is 'indeterminate, indistinct and unentrenched'9. As a result it is more difficult to define what constitutes an un-constitutional act or a breach of a citizen's constitutional rights. The duty of upholding the UK constitution and protecting Human Rights falls largely on the shoulders of the House of

  2. "The Royal Prerogative remains a significant source of constitutional law which is largely immune ...

    In BBC V Johns8, Lord Diplock stated: ......it is 350 years and a civil war too late for the Queen's courts to broaden the prerogative. The common law rule is that if a prerogative power has been replaced by

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution?

    constitution there is no body that can authorise and legitimise the introduction of a written constitution. Parliament would first have to pass many bills to declare that statute laws and Acts are no longer valid, which would be immensely time consuming, and that is after a referendum has taken place to make sure the citizens all want a written constitution.

  2. Constitutional Conventions of the UK

    The government is responsible to maintain the confidence of House of Commons. If the government failed to maintain the ?vote of confidence? on a matter central to government policy, then it is mandatory for the government to resign or advise the Queen to dissolve Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work