• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the relevance of the concept of the rule of law to current constitutional arrangements in the UK

Extracts from this document...


"In the mouth of British Constitutional Lawyer, the term "rule of law" seems to mean primary a corpus of basic principles and values, which together lend some stability and coherence to the legal order". (TRS Allan). In the light of the quote above, I am going to discuss the relevance of the concept of the rule of law to current constitutional arrangements in the UK. I will be looking at the current constitution in the UK, the doctrine of the rule of law and the relevance of the doctrine in the operation of state power. The UK is said to have an "unwritten constitution", because it has no single codified documentary constitution. However most of the constitution does exist in the written form of treaties, statutes and court judgements. Due to the absence of a formal written constitution in the UK, there is no positive statement of the basic principles governing state actions and no guidelines that could be used to assess the legitimacy of government action. Lawyers and politicians have used the concept of the rule of law in order to provide such a measure.1 The rule of law is capable of being interpreted differently by different people. It is a recognised principle of the English constitution, which is frequently used to signify a notion of "law and order". ...read more.


By the rule of law, all laws should be clear and open. In Merkur Island Shipping Corpn v Laughton12 1983, Lord Diplock stated "absence of clarity... encourage those who wish to undermine" the rule of law. The source of power has to be pointed out according to the courts. Referring to the first factor of Dicey's rule of law he mentions powers, this poses a problem when trying to define the powers. An example of this can be seen when trying to define 'arbitrary power' it could be interpreted to mean a power that can be abused if it is not protected by adequate controls and checks. Also it could be interpreted to mean powers that have a direct impact upon individual rights. A case that expounds this is Liversidge v Anderson13 [1942] where the home secretary assumed he had the belief that a detention without warrant was justified. If the first definition of arbitrary powers were used then the rule of law would not apply to our constitution, which is reliant on delegation, arbitration and control through report and review. The rule of law does in fact apply to every modern democratic constitution, but just in slightly different ways. Sir Ivor Jennings a prominent critic of Dicey, mentioned a weakness of his definition, "they (Dicey etc) ...read more.


Although he does say decisions should be made in accordance to procedural fairness, he is more concerned about regular enforcement and application rather then content. Writers have now began to expand the concept by including these issues (Delhi Declaration 1959).20 In conclusion complying with the rule of law may provide a check on abuse of power. It may provide a critical evaluation of how the power is used. Alone it is not a comprehensive code but must be used alongside other principles, which regulate the content of the legal rules. It can be argued that the rule of law is too vague, if the law is written down on paper it would be more accessible and easier to understand and obey. On the other side codification would require unnecessary money, time and effort what is the point on devising a remedy for something that works in the first place? Finally there are many interpretations of the doctrine of the rule of law, each having slightly different connotations. We all put into practice the principles of law everyday so we do have a basic idea what the law entails. Dicey's principle of the rule archaic, the general principle is still intact and forms part of the British Constitution today. It's the upholding of morality, faith and reasoning in the judiciary that gives the rule its eternal constitutional relevance rather than written rules. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Public Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A very well structured essay. The points are thought out carefully. A greater emphasis on current examples would improve the grade.

4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 06/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Public Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Essay on the function of Judicial Review

    4 star(s)

    If these procedures are not followed then it is more likely that a citizen will be ill-treated, in which case the primary purpose of judicial review seemsto be the redress function. Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights has provided an additional grounds for reivew by providing a right to an independent and impartial tribunal.

  2. Compare and contrast written and unwritten constitutions. Which type of constitution do you favour?

    Examples of such occurrences are Magna Carta 1215 and the petition of Rights following the revolution of 1688/9 these show the people fighting back very early on in the history of the constitution. This also means that entrenchment is not possible in the unwritten constitution because of Parliamentary Sovereignty.

  1. the principles in the case of Ridge Vs Baldwin

    The decision must be declared to be no decision." Such a decision must be declared void; until it has been scrutinized by a court it is voidable only and is not a nullity ab iniitio, as is an order of a court made without jurisdiction.

  2. 'The House of Lords should be abolished. The UK only needs one chamber of ...

    The UK's constitution is 'indeterminate, indistinct and unentrenched'9. As a result it is more difficult to define what constitutes an un-constitutional act or a breach of a citizen's constitutional rights. The duty of upholding the UK constitution and protecting Human Rights falls largely on the shoulders of the House of

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a written constitution?

    constitution there is no body that can authorise and legitimise the introduction of a written constitution. Parliament would first have to pass many bills to declare that statute laws and Acts are no longer valid, which would be immensely time consuming, and that is after a referendum has taken place to make sure the citizens all want a written constitution.

  2. "The Royal Prerogative remains a significant source of constitutional law which is largely immune ...

    Burmah Oil Ltd v Lord Advocate6), which, even 300 years after the revolution, remain poorly defined. Although, for the first time in history, on 20/10/03, a list of government's prerogative powers were published in response to a demand by the House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee.7 No new prerogative

  1. We are presented with a question finding its roots in the Judicial Review area ...

    provides arguments in favour of a complete adoption of the proportionality principle. He firstly acknowledges the attractiveness of attaining 'conceptual unity', removing the uncertainty brought to the table by bifurcation, thus allowing transparency. Another thing conceded is a 'fresh start' being desirable, in order to break free of the 'constitutional straitjacket' of Wednesbury.

  2. Critically evaluate the ability of tribunals to deliver effective administrative justice.

    departments have been criticized over recent years for making poor decisions due to their priority for speed and volume over quality and accuracy. [7] For example, in AJTC’s report “Right First Time”, the National Audit Office had recorded nearly 1.4 million cases been received through the central government’s redress system annually and costing about £708 million.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work