• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discussing the statement, It is thought that the value of damages for a breach of a duty in tort and a breach of contract should be similar.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Damages In discussing the statement, "It is thought that the value of damages for a breach of a duty in tort and a breach of contract should be similar.", it would be prudent to look at the obligations of the different parties under the two forms of law, to decide the validity of the statement. Due to the nature of law and the importance of making correct and reasonable judgements, there are always going to be decisions, rulings and judgements that will not satisfy all parties. In order to justify these decisions, the ruling party has to possess not only a thorough understanding of the law but also the full circumstances surrounding the actions brought by the plaintiff and also knowledge of any relevant cases brought beforehand which may set a binding precedence. It is therefore, bearing these last two points in mind, that no two cases where damages are seeking to be awarded are the same, whether it is under contract law or tort. Damages are said to be, "A sum of money awarded by a court as compensation for a tort or a breach of contract." A Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press the effect of which is to compensate the plaintiff in full for their losses (Restitutio in integrum). What affects the principal of damage claims is whether or not the obligations between the defendant and the plaintiff were entered into voluntarily (Contract) ...read more.

Middle

In recovering the monies, the amount of damages, which the plaintiff would be able to recover from the defendant, would be reduced. Damages paid under contract law are said to equate to the value as if the contract had been performed i.e. they place the plaintiff in the same economic position they would have been in if the contract had been completed. The purpose of damages under tort however are to put the plaintiff in the same economic position as though the tort had not been committed. The main problem with damage claims under tort is what is the basis of the award and how much compensation the defendant entitled to? A tort is "A wrongful act or omission for which damages can be obtained in a civil court by the person wronged, other than a wrong that is only a breach of contract." A Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press Most cases brought under tort deal with compensation claims for personal injury or damage to property, which are a result of intentional or negligent behaviour on the defendant's part. As with contract law, damages under tort are limited by the rules of remoteness of damage whereby the defendant is only liable for damages, which could have been reasonably foreseen. If the damages could have been foreseen however, a defence cannot be made based on the fact that the extent of the resulting damage was unforeseeable. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Pain and suffering * Loss of faculty and amenity * Damage to property When calculating the amount of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff, whether it is for a breach of contract or a breach of tort, there are always specific points to the case that will distinguish it from every other case that has gone beforehand. As there are no two cases the same, it is impossible to say before each case is heard, how much damages should be awarded, if any. As mentioned previously, the object of damages under tort is to place the plaintiff in the same position as though the tort had never been committed. Suppose in the act of breaking the tort, the defendant caused the plaintiff sufficient injury as to render them permanently disabled, what amount of damages could place the plaintiff in the position as though the tort had not been committed? Compare this with a case whereby a sub-contractor caused delay to a contract, what amount of damages should be awarded then to render the main contractor in the same position they would have been if they had completed on time? These two cases highlight the point that damages should be awarded based on merit. It cannot be said that damages for a breach of tort should be higher or the same as damages for a breach of contract or vice-versa. All that can be said is that the damages awarded should be fair and just, and should compensate the plaintiff fully. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. This paper deals with contract damages, their types and the way they are calculated ...

    Losses that are purely speculative are not recoverable.(Morkos 522) * "Damages must be reasonably foreseeable at the time the contract was made, as liable to result from the breach of the contract" (Paul Dobson 187). * Plaintiffs injured by a breach of contract have the duty to avoid or minimize)

  2. Essay on Construction Contract scenario. Ram Solutions (The Contractor), delivering a 15m new ...

    Also a duty of care is owed due to the current nature of the property being a building site, hence the occupier ought to reasonably protect any person from it (s.1(3) OLA 1984). This can be seen in BRR v Herrington [1972] AC 877 where a child had got through a gap in the fence near the railway line.

  1. Topic 6 : Remedies For Breach of Contract the Remedies Available To the Injured ...

    Case Study Lumley v Wagner (1852) 42 ER 687: Facts: Wagner contracted to sing at Lumley's theatre for a fixed period of time during which she was not to sing elsewhere. She broke this promise. Issue: Could Lumley stop her from singing for another employer, ie., obtain an injunction ?

  2. Critically examine and discuss the inter-relationship between the law of Contract and the law ...

    contract.3 There are doctrinal differences between the law of contract and tort on the basis of a 'root distinction between voluntary and purely imposed obligations. Contractual obligations are voluntary and particular to the parties, whereas liability in tort is imposed by law as a matter of policy and affects persons generally.

  1. Whether the common law fiduciary duty or duty of fidelity and good faith gives ...

    to retain any benefit or gain obtained or received by reason of his fiduciary position or through some opportunity or knowledge resulting from it.6 Similarly, if a person occupying a fiduciary position wishes to enter into a transaction which would otherwise amount to a breach of duty, they must, if

  2. In breach of contract actions, outline the basic rules regarding the recovery of damages ...

    An exception to this rule, known as the rule in Addis, is where the very object of the contract is for peace of mind or freedom from distress, which was established in the 'holiday cases' such as Jarvis v Swan Tours Ltd.

  1. Is it still viable today to maintain a distinction between contract law and tort?

    defendant to owe concurrent duties in contract and tort, although a claimant will not receive damages twice over. This is not to say that he will be denied a remedy in tort if he cannot establish a breach of contract, for although duty in tort is owed to persons generally,

  2. Contract Law Case. As well as discussing the offer made by Galac-Tech, advice will ...

    Once an offeree has written a letter accepting the offer as it states in the advert, both parties are legally in a contract. Relating this to the Carbolic Smoke Ball case, if Galac-Tech was to reject an offeree that used the correct procedure to respond to the offer, Galac-Tech would be breaching the contract and therefore could be sued.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work