• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discussion of two articles concerning Australian anti-terrorist surveillance laws.

Extracts from this document...


Law Foundations Assignment Since 9/11/2001, terror attacks, the approach to global threats has significantly transformed, from a once passive response based on race/land/power, to a pre-emptive approach based on disproportionate powers within different government bodies, with an apparent goal of upholding democratic rights and security (Head & Man, 2009). The extracts provided, offer different perspectives on the threat of terrorism, and whether the implementation of surveillance laws are indeed indispensable to uphold the. Extract 1, which originates from Mike Head?s (2012) ? Australian government proposes sweeping Internet surveillance? suggests a contradiction to the proposition made by the labour government, and questions the extent the government is willing to declare these laws being implemented in the name of protecting national security. The second extract (2), from the Attorney-general?s department (2012) ? Equipping Australia against emerging and evolving threats? explains why such strict surveillance laws, due to (technology advancement/ terrorism threats), are dire to the protection and welfare of the Australian population. Both extracts have a purpose to convince the audience as to why surveillance laws are a breach of power, privacy and control, or required for our own security. Throughout extract 1, Mike Head (2012) ...read more.


This form of fallacy is known as the red herring. Additionally the statements made in regards to the GFC still having occurring ramifications on the Australian economy, do have premise, however in accordance to the IMF (SMH, 2012), Australia?s economy is one of the strongest. Moreover the insinuation that the Gillard government is depriving Australians of work, or welfare, due to proposing an injection of cash into this reform again begs to question. Similarly there are a number of fallacies that can be found within extract 2. The ?slippery slope? fallacy is one of the most prominent throughout this extract?. This fallacy comprises when the conclusion of an argument rests upon the chain reaction, and there is not sufficient reason to think that the chain reaction will actually take place (Head, M & Mann, S, 2009). A specific statement made ?Attorney Generals Department?, states ? the absence of action, significant intelligence and evidence collection capabilities will be lost providing criminal elements with a technological upper hand?. The assumed correlation is not ample enough to demonstrate a chain reaction, for example, if these proposed laws are not put in action, there is no irrefutable proof that insists that intelligence and evidence capabilities will be lost, which in turn will put all Australian citizens under threat. ...read more.


of being not a customer or equal citizen, which steams from the fundamental principle of a free society under the rule of law (Head, M & Mann, S, 2009), because we have to be treated equally in equal circumstances. Moreover because the capacity to speak freely about any kinds of matters ? personal, religious, political, will be spied upon, it will create a constrained society, which in turn will be controlled by different sects of the government, which means fundamental human rights will be constrained or diminished, which essentially is indicative of democracy being threatened. Conclusively without sound justification as to why the laws that already exist need expansion, validation of the proposed implementation cannot be warranted to protect Australians, but instead it exploits the natural right to privacy and in some cases work/ freedom of speech of Australians. Socialists such as Mike Head believe that these propositions are disguised in allowing unprecedented powers. However General Attorney?s department through taking a utilitarian standpoint, insist that achieving the greatest good for the greatest happiness (which in this case is security). Nonetheless these proposals not only act as a threat to freedom of privacy under the human Rights declaration, but also allowing unprecedented powers and economic resources, in what seems to gain excessive control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Other Jurisdictions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Other Jurisdictions essays

  1. Anticipatory Bail under CRPC. A critical study of the recent amendments and judicial interpretation ...

    ran away from the place shows that the person doesn't deserve bail under this Section. The court finally observed that the legislature conferred a wide discretion on the High Court and the Court of Session to grant anticipatory bail because it evidently felt, firstly, that it would be difficult to


    the AAT.9 One of the key roles of the EPBCA10 includes the protection of threatened and endangered marine species.11 It applies throughout Australia, including its external territories12 and to adjacent waters claimed as Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The EPBCA13 established the Australian Whale Sanctuary (AWS)

  1. Unilateral Divorce in Muslim Law

    EFFECT OF TALAQ Regarding the effect of talaq, an important point is the exact moment in time when the divorce takes effect. This moment differs depending on the form of talaq. In the ahsan form, the talaq is effective at the expiry of the iddat period.

  2. Reasonable Forseeability in Australian Tort Law

    such as negligent mis-statements, acts or omissions; the courts have impliedly acknowledged that exclusively applying ?reasonable foreseeability? to situations of pure economic loss would inevitably undermine the basic principles of business and result in an unlimited number of claims[17].

  1. Indian Law. The Legality of In Camera Trials

    the interests of justice are upheld and the media- which can be a boon is just that, a boon not a bane. CHAPTER 4 CASES WHERE APPLICABLE While the main part of section 327 of the Criminal Procedure Code embodies the principle of public trial in open court the proviso recognises an exception to the principle.

  2. Fetal Abuse and American Law

    is not effective if the addict does not want recovery for themself.[115] 9. Within the United States, parenting is a fundamental right.[116] But, there also exists a right to be free of harm caused by others. Perfect parents do not exist, and everyone has their flaws.

  1. Critically examining 2-3 key issues make a case for socio-legal reform regarding intellectual disability ...

    and the lack of suitable options of accommodations that they are presented with. Due to their mental disability, they may have also had previous offences and a history of failing to appear in court, which makes granting bail very difficult for a police officer who is bound by a set

  2. Employment Law Case. The article relates the prosecution of Vincenzo Todaro, owner and ...

    ?Corporation laws concern the creation, organisation and administration of the companies? (Lambiris 2011, 10). Both VST and VCR were Ltd that means companies with Limited liability. The shareholder in a limited company is liable just for the value of his share (Business Structures in Australia 2010).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work