• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  40. 40
    40
  41. 41
    41
  42. 42
    42
  43. 43
    43
  44. 44
    44
  45. 45
    45
  46. 46
    46
  47. 47
    47
  48. 48
    48
  49. 49
    49
  50. 50
    50
  51. 51
    51
  52. 52
    52
  53. 53
    53
  54. 54
    54
  55. 55
    55
  56. 56
    56

Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Module 2 - Dispute Solving Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives The English legal system is unusual in having 2 legal professions; solicitors and barristers. Most legal professions have lawyers who although specialise they qualify in the same way. Historically solicitors represented by the LAW SOCIETY and barristers represented by the BAR COUNCIL reached an agreement to divide the legal work between themselves basically this gave solicitors sole right of access to clients and barristers sole rights of access to the courts. In recent years this division has been broken down, solicitors have increasing access to the courts while barristers have some access to clients. Training of Solicitors Law society Law degree Non-Law degree 1 year common profession exam Legal Practice Course - 1 year (have to pay own fees) Training Contract - 2 years + 3 years before you can set up your own practice Bar Council Law Degree Non-Law degree 1 year common profession exam Inns of Court Grays Lincons Middle Temple Inner Temple All based in London Bar Vocational Exam 1 year 18 Dinners Get 2 barristers to take you on Pupilage 1 year 6 months with each barrister. First 6 months was unpaid, but not set at national minimum rate. 2nd 6 months is paid at national minimum rate Can stay for longer than 1 year but will still only receive same rate of pay Called to 'Bar' to receive certificate 2 types of barrister; Junior and QC Chambers Must get into chambers within 3 years of leaving Pupilage or you are time barred and will never be able to become a practicing barrister QC = Queens Council (silks) - Have to be a junior for at least 10 years and are chosen by the bar council (can't ask to be one) Bar council opened 9 regional centres and 12 dinners need only to be taken Typical work of a solicitor 1. ...read more.

Middle

How accurate is the electoral register? * Younger generations are far more likely to move residence than those who have mortgages * Some exclude themselves from it because the link between electoral and taxation * Ethnic minorities do not register for the results of doing so. 2. Random selection may produce racial bias 3. Random Selection may produce gender bias 4. Although the system is vetted, a large number are still becoming jurors - 1 in 25 is a disqualified juror * These who get through also tend to become foremen who influence the jury's decision * Snarebrook Crown Court 15 previous convictions and knew he was disqualified sat on 3 trails, on 2 he was foreman, once caught he said unless a paedophile they are innocent 5. Excusals * The majority are woman whom get excusals - childcare The role of the jury The judge is there for matters of law whereas the jury is there for matters of fact. On matters of law the judge can acquit. However, the judge cannot tell the jury to reach any verdict. He can say "if guilty it must be beyond all reasonable doubt" judge always asks for an anonymous verdict From 1967 (made law 1974) the majority verdict came to force. After 2 hours (minimum) the judge must redirect by saying he will accept a majority verdict of 10-2 or 9-1. Once a majority decision has come to force the foreman must say in court to the judge the actual numbers of the majority verdict Pigg 1983 - the foreman came back and said they had reached a majority verdict of 10 and the judge accepted it. On appeal the conviction stood. The process of reaching this decision is completely covered by the contempt of court act 1987. If they cannot reach a decision the judge will ultimately dismiss the jury at his discretion. The CPS can then retrial the case meaning the new jury will be introduced. ...read more.

Conclusion

Their extensive use The social security tribunal for example hears 10,000+ cases per year, cases which otherwise would have to be heard in a court of law. 2. The cost of tribunals Tribunal's costs are much lower than court costs. There is no need for representation; however, statistics suggest that people who use a lawyer in a tribunal have around a 50% chance of winning while people without representatives have about a 30% chance. 3. The speed Generally tribunal cases are much quicker to be heard than cases in the courts. However, under the new fast track arrangements where by cases should go to court within 30 weeks tribunals now enjoy less of an advantage. 4. Simple procedures This is particularly useful for individuals bringing their own cases who can not afford legal representation. However, as mentioned above the success rate for these people is low. 5. Tribunals become experts As they deal with a very limited area of law. E.g. Employment, the chairman and the 2 lay members become very expert in this field. Disadvantages of tribunals 1. Lack of legal aid Individuals who can pay for representatives enjoy a distinct advantage 2. Limited rights of appeal Some tribunals do not need to publish the reasons for their decision which makes appeals virtually impossible. Some tribunals don't have rights of appeal at all. Whilst the ones that do (E.g. Immigration, Social security, and mental health) have far fewer rights than cases heard in court. 3. Unlike the courts tribunals do not operate a system of strict judicial precedent This means that compared to a court case, the outcome of a tribunal is far more difficult to predict. This means that legal advice is difficult to obtain and so less cases are settled outside the tribunal. 4. Tribunals are less respected than the courts This means that parties are less likely to accept the decisions of a tribunal and it is far more difficult to take action to get the decision enforced. End of Module 2 Started on 08th January 2002 Finished on 19th March 2002 Robert Cook Module 2 P. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Does the law of nullity continue to have any valuable role to play in ...

    seem necessary in order to protect susceptible children growing up under the influence of their parents. That either party is under the age of sixteen, does this ground still have a role to play, it clearly does as it reflects the criminal law which states that it is illegal to

  2. 'The Land Registration Act 2002 makes a poor attempt at reforming the law of ...

    registered owner is aware and objects to the claim then the application will be rejected. However once notified the paper owner has two years in which to either formalise the occupation or to evict the occupier. During this time the paper title owner must not 'sleep on his rights'.25 If

  1. Critically analyse the effectiveness of lay people and compare and contrast the roles played ...

    Solicitors are also employed by the crown and are now more widely recognised in some inferior courts as having rights of audience. Solicitors have a more flexible practice than barristers although when they first qualify they have very limited rights of audience.

  2. Discuss Dicey's three propositions on the concept of the Rule of Law in the ...

    In other words, the government cannot simply define a new crime and apply the new definition retrospectively. The rationale for this principle is that, first, the government should not be allowed to abuse its power by punishing individuals for political or other conveniences; second, it would be grossly unjust and

  1. Company Law 5. ...

    the remedy, and the courts were adamant that no individual should be allowed to hide behind the veil to escape detection for their behaviour therein28. By the 1960s the increasingly sophisticated use of group structures was beginning to cause the courts some difficulty with the strict application of the Salomon doctrine.

  2. 'The Supreme Court has too much power for an unelected body' Discuss

    Georgia (1972) the Court decided that the death penalty, as then imposed, was a 'cruel and unusual punishment', and thereby violated the 8th Amendment. However, in Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the Court retreated from its original position and now the majority of states now include the death penalty in their statutes.

  1. In order to discuss Alan's criminal liability, it is necessary to look at the ...

    This test would only apply if Alan appeared to believe that his actions were not dishonest but there was some doubt about whether he really thought that others would share his view. In this case, it is quite obvious that Alan had acted dishonestly and knew that others would think that he was acting wrongly.

  2. "The purposive approach to statutory interpretation allows individual judges to give free rein to ...

    exactly what parliament were setting out to do, as in looking at the purpose of the act. The core question here is how do judges choose to explain the construction they have placed on the statute? Willis15 explained that there is not "one great sun of a principle/the plain meaning rule."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work