• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  40. 40
    40
  41. 41
    41
  42. 42
    42
  43. 43
    43
  44. 44
    44
  45. 45
    45
  46. 46
    46
  47. 47
    47
  48. 48
    48
  49. 49
    49
  50. 50
    50
  51. 51
    51
  52. 52
    52
  53. 53
    53
  54. 54
    54
  55. 55
    55
  56. 56
    56

Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Module 2 - Dispute Solving Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives The English legal system is unusual in having 2 legal professions; solicitors and barristers. Most legal professions have lawyers who although specialise they qualify in the same way. Historically solicitors represented by the LAW SOCIETY and barristers represented by the BAR COUNCIL reached an agreement to divide the legal work between themselves basically this gave solicitors sole right of access to clients and barristers sole rights of access to the courts. In recent years this division has been broken down, solicitors have increasing access to the courts while barristers have some access to clients. Training of Solicitors Law society Law degree Non-Law degree 1 year common profession exam Legal Practice Course - 1 year (have to pay own fees) Training Contract - 2 years + 3 years before you can set up your own practice Bar Council Law Degree Non-Law degree 1 year common profession exam Inns of Court Grays Lincons Middle Temple Inner Temple All based in London Bar Vocational Exam 1 year 18 Dinners Get 2 barristers to take you on Pupilage 1 year 6 months with each barrister. First 6 months was unpaid, but not set at national minimum rate. 2nd 6 months is paid at national minimum rate Can stay for longer than 1 year but will still only receive same rate of pay Called to 'Bar' to receive certificate 2 types of barrister; Junior and QC Chambers Must get into chambers within 3 years of leaving Pupilage or you are time barred and will never be able to become a practicing barrister QC = Queens Council (silks) - Have to be a junior for at least 10 years and are chosen by the bar council (can't ask to be one) Bar council opened 9 regional centres and 12 dinners need only to be taken Typical work of a solicitor 1. ...read more.

Middle

How accurate is the electoral register? * Younger generations are far more likely to move residence than those who have mortgages * Some exclude themselves from it because the link between electoral and taxation * Ethnic minorities do not register for the results of doing so. 2. Random selection may produce racial bias 3. Random Selection may produce gender bias 4. Although the system is vetted, a large number are still becoming jurors - 1 in 25 is a disqualified juror * These who get through also tend to become foremen who influence the jury's decision * Snarebrook Crown Court 15 previous convictions and knew he was disqualified sat on 3 trails, on 2 he was foreman, once caught he said unless a paedophile they are innocent 5. Excusals * The majority are woman whom get excusals - childcare The role of the jury The judge is there for matters of law whereas the jury is there for matters of fact. On matters of law the judge can acquit. However, the judge cannot tell the jury to reach any verdict. He can say "if guilty it must be beyond all reasonable doubt" judge always asks for an anonymous verdict From 1967 (made law 1974) the majority verdict came to force. After 2 hours (minimum) the judge must redirect by saying he will accept a majority verdict of 10-2 or 9-1. Once a majority decision has come to force the foreman must say in court to the judge the actual numbers of the majority verdict Pigg 1983 - the foreman came back and said they had reached a majority verdict of 10 and the judge accepted it. On appeal the conviction stood. The process of reaching this decision is completely covered by the contempt of court act 1987. If they cannot reach a decision the judge will ultimately dismiss the jury at his discretion. The CPS can then retrial the case meaning the new jury will be introduced. ...read more.

Conclusion

Their extensive use The social security tribunal for example hears 10,000+ cases per year, cases which otherwise would have to be heard in a court of law. 2. The cost of tribunals Tribunal's costs are much lower than court costs. There is no need for representation; however, statistics suggest that people who use a lawyer in a tribunal have around a 50% chance of winning while people without representatives have about a 30% chance. 3. The speed Generally tribunal cases are much quicker to be heard than cases in the courts. However, under the new fast track arrangements where by cases should go to court within 30 weeks tribunals now enjoy less of an advantage. 4. Simple procedures This is particularly useful for individuals bringing their own cases who can not afford legal representation. However, as mentioned above the success rate for these people is low. 5. Tribunals become experts As they deal with a very limited area of law. E.g. Employment, the chairman and the 2 lay members become very expert in this field. Disadvantages of tribunals 1. Lack of legal aid Individuals who can pay for representatives enjoy a distinct advantage 2. Limited rights of appeal Some tribunals do not need to publish the reasons for their decision which makes appeals virtually impossible. Some tribunals don't have rights of appeal at all. Whilst the ones that do (E.g. Immigration, Social security, and mental health) have far fewer rights than cases heard in court. 3. Unlike the courts tribunals do not operate a system of strict judicial precedent This means that compared to a court case, the outcome of a tribunal is far more difficult to predict. This means that legal advice is difficult to obtain and so less cases are settled outside the tribunal. 4. Tribunals are less respected than the courts This means that parties are less likely to accept the decisions of a tribunal and it is far more difficult to take action to get the decision enforced. End of Module 2 Started on 08th January 2002 Finished on 19th March 2002 Robert Cook Module 2 P. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Constitutional and Administrative Law - Compare and contrast Lord Denning's judgment in the Court ...

    who keep two sets of books", he maintains that legislation "drawn so widely... might be an instrument of oppression". He points out, agreeing with Dicey, that " once great power is granted, there is a danger of it being abused" and that rather than risking this and the subsequent perpetuation

  2. Does the law of nullity continue to have any valuable role to play in ...

    seem necessary in order to protect susceptible children growing up under the influence of their parents. That either party is under the age of sixteen, does this ground still have a role to play, it clearly does as it reflects the criminal law which states that it is illegal to

  1. Should the jury trial be abolished?

    A study done by McCabe & Purves looked at 173 acquitals and concluded that 9% defied the evidence. Proposed Alternatives Up to this point I have concentrated on the jury system and some of the problems that have been associated with it and some proposals for future change.

  2. "Should Fiscal and Trusts Law Privileges be separated?"

    in the view of the inconsistencies in decisions on charitable status to maintain that all trusts for charitable purposes deserve tax exemption of some sort. In an attempt to solving this problem, the Charity Law Reform Committee24 proposed that fiscal privileges associated with charity should be granted to all genuinely

  1. A Critical Review of 'Property, Authority and the Criminal Law' by Douglas Hay.

    age, which was a very important factor in the sentencing, with 'youth pleaded as a general mitigating circumstance'28. He also informs his reader of the large amount of support given by the courts to the lower class in order to mount prosecutions, and tells us that this funding was not given equally to the middle class.

  2. 'The Supreme Court has too much power for an unelected body' Discuss

    The Supreme Court may be an unelected body but the fact is that the judges are appointed, all federal judges are appointed by the president with 'the advice and consent of the Senate (Article II section 2). Judges are expected to be legally qualified, have practised law, and have had judicial experience.

  1. Critically analyse the effectiveness of lay people and compare and contrast the roles played ...

    This encompasses all matters in the magistrate's court and county court. Within the Crown Court they may only appear for preliminary matters or for appeals against the decisions of magistrates. In the High Court a solicitor has no automatic rights of audience in open court but can be heard in

  2. "Critically discuss the role and importance of international commercial arbitration as an alternative dispute ...

    The parties set up the arbitration as a consensual processus and therefore have the power (there are sometimes limitations: the Swedish law or some matters which cannot be subject to arbitration) to specify for themselves what rules should govern their contractual relationship.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work