• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...


Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.


The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.


So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Tort Law in Malaysia

    of waiver, release, accord and satisfaction, judgment, limitation, and death of a party. Should not be denied that extinguishing the liability of the defendant in certain circumstances is required for the justice to both parties, but in certain situation it's worked contradicts.

  2. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    Any disobedience to follow equitable remedies was and is nowadays to be punished by courts. Another source of law are books of authority. Those are papers from antiquity that have been regarded as a source of law because they were written at the very beginning of law creation by senior members of the judiciary.

  1. Judges Make Law

    However the House of Lords will not always use the practice Direction. In C v DPP 4 they considered the law on child criminals. They refused to change the law as they felt if a change was required it was best left to parliament to decide.

  2. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    Lord Denning ( Master of the Rolls ) opposed this and argued his view that the court should not be bound by its own previous decisions or the previous decisions made in the House of Lords. He felt that if they found a previous decision to be wrong, they should have the freedom to depart from it.

  1. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    In contrast to Austen's 'command theory', Hart's rules of recognition were not all powerful but could be subject to change i.e. in Australia the Constitution can be amended through referendum. Hart split laws into two sub-groups, primary and secondary rules.

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    These include the Criminal Appeal Reports, the Family Law Reports, the Industrial Relations Law Reports, Lloyds Reports on commercial and shipping law, the Entertainment and Media Law Reports, the European Human Rights Reports, and so on. Many recent cases are reported on-line on the Internet or on CD-ROMs.

  1. The judicial process: should judges ever make the law?

    matrimonial consent and contract the wife hath given up herself in this kind unto her husband which she cannot retract.' Sir Matthew Hale11 This 17th century statement was regarded as accurate until the Second World War. Gradually, however, the courts started allowing exceptions to it, but it took until the

  2. Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

    Used all the tricks to get trial delayed. On the day of trial they pleaded guilty. The judge refused to give them the 1/3 off their sentence. They said it was their legal right. The COA agreed with judge that they were not entitled to the full 1/3.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work