• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.

Middle

The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.

Conclusion

So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Tort Law in Malaysia

    This section would fail the aims of tort in some cases if the action brought to court only after six years time. Yet, the aims of tort law do meet in some cases. With the introduction of insurances, it serves and meet the compensation objective of torts.

  2. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    Despite the fact that many refer to them as old-fashioned, because they reflect the operating system and values of the time when written, they are a source of law nowadays. Sir Edward Coke's Institutes of the Laws of England13, for instance, was used by the former Lord Chief Justice of England to define when the offence of murder does occur.

  1. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    Primary rules being the recognised substantive rules regulating behaviour in all soceities. In developed legal systems these primary rules had subservient secondary rules which enabled them to function. The secondary rules provided a mechanism for the primary rules to be changed and enforced; and being generally known to society provided

  2. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  1. Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

    - Statutory instrument � Local Authority - By laws Providing a judge challenge one of these 3 sources of delegated legislation they have the power to declare the legislation ULTRA VIRES. A judge can over rule delegated legislation. Examples of ULTRA VIRES D.P.P v Hutchinson 1990 - H was a member of the "Greenham Common" and was testing the law.

  2. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    is their choice whether or not they want to follow the precedent. Generally, inferior courts must abide by precedents made by superior higher courts. Some courts are also bound by their own previous decisions as well as decisions made by higher courts.

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    The basic rule of common law systems is that precedents are binding, subject to their being distinguished or overruled - to this extent a judge may be unable to apply the principles he thinks correct if there is a (possibly mistaken)

  2. Sources of Law - Judicial precedent.

    person (who had then been killed by another), and then actually killed a man on Murray's orders. Res judicata - The House of Lords ruled that that the defence of duress was not available to D as either the principal offender in one murder, or as the secondary party to the other murder.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work