• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.

Middle

The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.

Conclusion

So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Judges Make Law

    The use of this Practice Statement could therefore give judges the opportunity to make Law The Court of Appeal has a more limited ability to be creative as they are generally bound by their own previous decision. There are however exceptions to this, when there is a conflicting decision in

  2. Tort Law in Malaysia

    of waiver, release, accord and satisfaction, judgment, limitation, and death of a party. Should not be denied that extinguishing the liability of the defendant in certain circumstances is required for the justice to both parties, but in certain situation it's worked contradicts.

  1. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    With the creation of common law system, during the practice of judges, another main source did evolve - equity. It is said to be 'a system of doctrines which developed side by side with the common law and statute law...evolved by the Lord Chancellor and the Court of Chancery in their attempts to remedy the defects of the common law'9.

  2. Adversarial and Inqusitorial legal systems

    In order to grasp essence of the Adversarial trial system one must look at the facts and outcome of a case between Whitehouse v Jordan 3 .In this case judge has to make up his own mind due to conflicting and incomplete evidence in some respects and he concluded on

  1. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    interpret what has been said to us based on other information such as context, circumstance, habit, ritual etcetera.3 Using these basic skills, we carry out the requested action resulting in the end product being achieved as desired. Interpretation in this context is instinctive.

  2. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    Hart's 'recognition theory' took a quite different view of the nature of law. Hart's view was that a law becomes a law through a rule of recognition. Hart is not always clear as to what constitutes a rule of recognition but in Australia it would be reasonable to see the Constitutuion as one of these.

  1. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    If this is not possible the precedent is said to be made per incuriam, and is no longer used. There also needs to be a clear hierarchy of courts where superior and inferior courts are established. The UK system of judicial precedent provides this as there is a very clear

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    The most highly regarded are The Law Reports (properly so-called) produced by the Incorporated Council for Law Reporting, set up for this purpose by the Law Society and the Inns of Court in 1865. These reports are checked for accuracy by the judges in the cases reported, and often include

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work