• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...


Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.


The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.


So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    rights campaigners (anti blood sport league), Crufts, national union of farmers, countryside commission etc... In the majority of cases private members bills which don't get parliamentary support rarely become law. However, some bills if not receiving government support don't face government opposition.

  2. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    As a result of this, a six year old child was severely injured as he was electrocuted when he stepped on the tracks. He gained access to the tracks through the broken fence. The House of Lords held that the occupiers owed the trespassers a duty of care to observe

  1. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    valid because it is not of a legal right but of certain control. In the case of Mills V Colchester Corporation5 because of the latter circumstances, the court refused to enforce the custom. Moreover, the custom must be reasonable, meaning that there should be no contradiction with the fundamental principles of right and wrong.

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    law, materially modify an existing principle of law, or settle a doubtful question of law. Also included are questions of interpretation of statutes and important cases illustrating new applications of existing principles. It is sometimes argued that the courts themselves should take over the production of Reports from the private

  1. 'In every field of law and legal practice, the law itself is gendered. That ...

    The existence of feminine anger, whether through fear or otherwise, is an emotion out of sync with judicial conceptions of femininity. Anger manifesting in violence by a female perpetrator goes against the grain of both the criminal law and the essence of the 'feminine'.42 Masculine provocation includes a perspective on the challenging conduct of the victim.

  2. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    interpret what has been said to us based on other information such as context, circumstance, habit, ritual etcetera.3 Using these basic skills, we carry out the requested action resulting in the end product being achieved as desired. Interpretation in this context is instinctive.

  1. Precedents are not binding statements which future judges must follow. They are in fact ...

    This should decrease the likelihood of an appeal, if the higher court's opinion on the matter is clear. Without persuasive precedents the body of law set down by the Lords and, to a lesser extent, the Supreme Court, would be almost insignificant.

  2. Constitutional law.

    * Acts of the Scottish Assembly would remain open to legal challenge after enactment, with final appeal to the Privy Council."2 Footnote 1. p34 Convery. J, Constitutional. Law Basics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work