• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.

Middle

The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.

Conclusion

So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    It produced 36 reports none of which parliament had acted upon. In 1985 the law commission published its most dramatic reform proposals. The draft Criminal Code suggested how all criminal offences could be brought under a single piece of legislation.

  2. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    valid because it is not of a legal right but of certain control. In the case of Mills V Colchester Corporation5 because of the latter circumstances, the court refused to enforce the custom. Moreover, the custom must be reasonable, meaning that there should be no contradiction with the fundamental principles of right and wrong.

  1. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    and distinguished court hierarchy established by the Judicature Acts 1873 - 75. Also, judgements are recorded accurately and reliably as barristers report judgements made by the superior courts and are published in newspapers ( e.g. The Times ), journals and volumes of collected reports ( e.g.

  2. Constitutional law.

    Thinking that this cause would be abandoned it was in fact supported by the reducing amount of Conservative representation in Scotland throughout the 1980's. With this all that it ended up doing was confirm that a government with "no mandate" was ruling Scotland improperly.2 However devolution is progressing further.

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    Sedley LJ (dissenting in Shogun v Hudson) said the law is still unclear: this is evidently true, and it is wrong that the courts should resort to very technical distinctions to decide essentially similar cases in different ways. The law should be clear one way or the other, and that

  2. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  1. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    Interpretation in language alone is not without its own pitfalls and misunderstandings, so it should come as no surprise, therefore, that interpreting laws and enacting them comes with its own perils and problems. When we, as ordinary people, receive even the simplest of instructions to carry out certain tasks, we

  2. 'In every field of law and legal practice, the law itself is gendered. That ...

    A female defendant pleading provocation is therefore required to establish that the abusive treatment received caused her to lose her self-control. It will then be left to the jury to distinguish whether her reaction could also be one of 'the reasonable man'.32 Although in R v Camplin33 the reasonable man

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work