• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.

Middle

The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.

Conclusion

So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    to run until the plaintiff knew he had a worthwhile cause of action, Lords Simon and Salmon had disagreed, and Lord Pearson had agreed with the latter on the law but found as a fact that the plaintiff in that case was entitled to claim.

  2. Constitutional law.

    There were 3 themes; these were made up of research questions. The themes were: "Nationalism and National Identity; Governance and Constitutional Matters; Economic and Social Policy."4 These themes basically asked the question of what the impact on devolution has on them.

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Home secretary could run the scheme as it saw fit. He said firemen don't qualify for the CICB Court disagreed R v Sec. State Soc Sec Ex parte Joint Council for Welfare if Immigrants 1996 Related to benefits (1992 social security act)

  2. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  1. 'In every field of law and legal practice, the law itself is gendered. That ...

    more covert in its bigotry as the standard is disguised as one of gender neutrality yet greater importance is attached to a man's sexual security than to a woman's personal safety. A clear adjustment of the criminal law defences is necessary to achieve justice for the battered woman.

  2. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    In 1952 he was selected as the Professor of Jurisprudence. He resigned that position in 1969 and was succeeded by Ronald Dworkin. A. Hart's Slant on Positivism. Hart critically analysed the works of the 19th century positivist's Bentham and Austen in order to develop his own theory.

  1. Constitutional Law

    must be filed "promptly" and "in any event not later than 3 months after the grounds to make the claim first arose." Assuming the Scroggs has not delayed in his seeking of legal redress and that his claim falls within the stipulated time limit, he should be able to apply

  2. The judicial process: should judges ever make the law?

    be ineffective or even wrong, the courts would be willing to require a policy review if the authority failed to conduct one. The Master of the Rolls stated in R. v. Oxford, ex p. Levey7, '...Any officer who found that his chosen methods were [proven] ineffective would be under a duty to re-examine them and consider what alteration was required...'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work