• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...


Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.


The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.


So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    In the case of R V R (Rape: Marital Exemption)16 the Court of Appeal and then the House of Lords declared that even within marriage, sexual offence should be considered.

  2. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    In each parliamentary session a small number of MP's are randomly selected to introduce a private members bill. When selected these MP's become the target of literally hundreds of pressure and interest groups. These groups suggest ways in which the law can be changed in favour of their views.

  1. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    by their own decisions, this was done to ensure certainty in the law. This meant that the only way a previous precedent made by the Lords could be changed was through an Act of Parliament. However this changed in 1966 when the Lord Chancellor issued what is called a Practise Statement.

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    precedent binding him. R v Home Secretary ex p Anderson & Taylor (2001) Times 27/2/01, DC Two convicted murderers sought judicial review of the Home Secretary's decision to increase their "tariff" sentences beyond those recommended by the trial judge. Their argument was that under the Human Rights Act 1998 their

  1. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  2. Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

    The D.P.P questioned the validity. D.P.P ruled that common land can not be private R v Home Sec. Ex parte Fire Brigade Union 1995 - H had gone ultra vires when making the decision to exclude the fire brigade from the CICB R v Sec Stae Ex parte Equal Opps Commission 1995 - British government

  1. Constitutional and administrative - "Under the largely unwritten constitution of the United Kingdom, the ...

    It is with the officer of Lord Chancellor that the absence of separation of powers is most marked. The Lord Chancellor is a member not only of the government but also of the cabinet. He is chosen by the Prime Minister.

  2. Precedents are not binding statements which future judges must follow. They are in fact ...

    Obiter dicta have formed law, for example, in Central London Property Trust Ltd. v. High Trees House Ltd. [1947] KB 130 and Pinnel's Case. In some areas of law, persuasive precedents from very lowly courts have been seen as almost as inviolable as those of the mighty Law Lords, e.g.,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work