• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...


Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.


The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.


So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Although the draft Criminal Code was well received by the judiciary and the legal academics it appeared to be far too radical for parliament. Since 1985 the law commission has limited itself to investigations into small specific areas of law.

  2. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    There are hundreds of cases and different precedents being produced each day so the law keeps changing, judgements need to be recorded accurately to avoid confusion and it has to be possible for judges to be able to establish the ratio decidendi from cases.

  1. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  2. Constitutional law.

    Green. Edinburgh 1998. 2. http://www.saltireguide.co.uk/secure/sal1-1.htm. There were a large number of voters in Scotland and Northern Ireland, they voted to have their respective forms of devolution. Their vote by the public proved crucial in 1979. The Welsh hardly voted.

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    [Leave has since been given for an appeal to the House of Lords.] As Lord Denning MR pointed out in Lewis v Averay, frauds of this sort almost always result in a conflict between two quite innocent parties, and there will always be hard cases.

  2. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    Interpretation in language alone is not without its own pitfalls and misunderstandings, so it should come as no surprise, therefore, that interpreting laws and enacting them comes with its own perils and problems. When we, as ordinary people, receive even the simplest of instructions to carry out certain tasks, we

  1. Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

    This results in what are often described as perverse judgements. R v Ponting 1985 - P was a civil servant during the Falklands conflict. British government ordered the sinking of an Argentinean ship. This was because it was "heading towards" the British fleets.

  2. Adversarial and Inqusitorial legal systems

    Each side, 2John H.Farrar and Anthony M.Dugdale,Introduction to legal methods,3rd edn 1990 acting in its self-interest, is expected to present facts and interpretations of the law in a way most favorable to its interests. The approach presumes that the accused is innocent, and the burden of proving guilt rests with the prosecution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work