• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...


Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.


The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.


So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Tort Law in Malaysia

    For instance, a final judgment may terminate the original cause of action. The principle is that the plaintiff may not claim again for the same tort for the reason that the injury that he suffers is more serious than at the date judgment was given22.

  2. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    The third rule is the mischief rule and it aims to find the gap in the law that Parliament seeks to remedy. This was seen in Smith v Hughes (1960). However there are still arguments with the literal rule, as when it does create injustice, the courts look for another

  1. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    Similarly, in the case of Mercer V Deane4 a defendant was seized of building houses on his own property - a beach - because a fisherman claimed that there was a custom rule that enforced him of using the land to dry his nets when fishing.

  2. The judicial process: should judges ever make the law?

    Not always is the government pleased with the judgement of the court, for example when the courts exercise a supervisory jurisdiction on matters such as the limits of an authority's powers, which affect the legality of official decisions. The judicial control, which exists even when there is no right of

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Report of law reform organisation The law commission is appointed by the government to look into problems with the law. If the report is accepted it may become the basic of new legislation in two to three years time. Clearly these reports are important background to subsequent statute 7.

  2. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  1. Constitutional law.

    http://www.saltireguide.co.uk/secure/sal1-1.htm. The government in 1975 introduced a white paper outlining some proposals. "Our Changing Democracy: Devolution to Scotland and Wales."1 This white paper then led the introduction of a bill for Scotland and Wales in the House of Commons in 1976 but it was withdrawn due to the fact it was badly drafted.

  2. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    HERBERT LIONEL ADOLPHUS HART (1907-1992). Hart, born in England in 1907, studied at New College, Oxford prior to practising at the Bar (1932 to 1942). Following the second world war (during which he worked for British Military Intelligence) he was appointed as a tutor at the Oxford college where he had studied as an undergraduate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work