• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.

Middle

The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.

Conclusion

So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Tort Law in Malaysia

    Even though there are two exceptions in this principle, it may be in some circumstances, as in Wain v. F Sherwood Ltd.23 became unjust to the plaintiff.( In Wain's case, the plaintiff failed in bringing a second action in respect of his back injury failed.)

  2. Judges Make Law

    However the House of Lords will not always use the practice Direction. In C v DPP 4 they considered the law on child criminals. They refused to change the law as they felt if a change was required it was best left to parliament to decide.

  1. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    Another method they use to interpret law is by Statutory interpretation. Parliament has given the courts two main sources of guidance to help them interpret statutes. The Interpretation Act 1978 provides certain standard definitions of common provision, such as the rule that the singular includes the plural and that 'he' also includes 'she'.

  2. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    interpret what has been said to us based on other information such as context, circumstance, habit, ritual etcetera.3 Using these basic skills, we carry out the requested action resulting in the end product being achieved as desired. Interpretation in this context is instinctive.

  1. Adversarial and Inqusitorial legal systems

    In order to grasp essence of the Adversarial trial system one must look at the facts and outcome of a case between Whitehouse v Jordan 3 .In this case judge has to make up his own mind due to conflicting and incomplete evidence in some respects and he concluded on

  2. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    In Simpson V Wells3 legal documentary evidence was available of the existence of a rule in a statute of the fourteenth century that people were allowed to put a refreshment stand on a footpath. It was proved of this right to have existed during the centuries therefore people are still capable of doing it.

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Sometimes there is a need for brand new law as new situations develop (E.g. Computer crime) sometimes the law needs updating as the original view of the law is no longer the view of society (E.g. Matrimonial rape) In other situations the common law may have developed into a structure which is no longer practical (E.g.

  2. Constitutional law.

    The Welsh hardly voted. As for the English voters they did not at the time have the opportunity to decide whether they wished to have a form of devolution.1 The result of the 1979 referendum had nothing to do with opposition to the principle of devolution than the actual dislike of the devolution that was on offer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work