• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.

Middle

The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.

Conclusion

So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Judges Make Law

    The use of this Practice Statement could therefore give judges the opportunity to make Law The Court of Appeal has a more limited ability to be creative as they are generally bound by their own previous decision. There are however exceptions to this, when there is a conflicting decision in

  2. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    In other words, it evolved with the discovery of gaps in the common law system, problems that needed to be fixed, laws to be changed. A defect was that procedures were strictly referred to writs, which were created each time there was need of one, because cases were started on the basis of them.

  1. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    Finally, the courts found at the bottom of the hierarchy are the Crown Courts , Magistrates Court and the County Court, and because these are inferior courts, they must follow all decisions from the higher courts. Precedent is one way in which the courts try to interpret the law.

  2. Adversarial and Inqusitorial legal systems

    In order to grasp essence of the Adversarial trial system one must look at the facts and outcome of a case between Whitehouse v Jordan 3 .In this case judge has to make up his own mind due to conflicting and incomplete evidence in some respects and he concluded on

  1. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    interpret what has been said to us based on other information such as context, circumstance, habit, ritual etcetera.3 Using these basic skills, we carry out the requested action resulting in the end product being achieved as desired. Interpretation in this context is instinctive.

  2. Tort Law in Malaysia

    In the case of Dato Hamzah v. Dr. Muhammed Ali20, the court held that in order for an application for an injunction to succeed, the appellant must determine to the satisfaction of the court, the identities of the person responsible for publishing the said letters.

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    The law reform act 1995 repealed 223 complete statutes and 259 parts of other statutes. In the past 25 years parliament has repealed in excess of 1,600 statutes. 2. Consolidation This involves passing several acts on the same subject. The latest version of the act in effect takes on board all the previous versions of the act.

  2. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    believed haunted their work.1 Although critical of their work, Hart had great respect for their views stating that: ...Bentham and Austin were not dry analysts fiddling with verbal distinctions while cities burned, but were the vanguard of a movement which laboured with passionate intensity and much success to bring about a better society and better laws.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work