• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (

Extracts from this document...


Do judges make law? The legal systems within the United Kingdom were based largely on judge-made law (law developed through decisions by judges necessary to decide cases brought before them - called "common law" or case-law) until around the seventeenth century. Each jurisdiction developed its own forms of common law, with Scotland being especially distinct from the rest. Since that time, new laws and law reform have increasingly been brought about through Acts of Parliament, usually inspired by policies of the Government of the day. Even so, the development of case-law still remains an important source of law. A statement of law made by a judge in a case can become binding on later judges and can in this way become the law for everyone to follow. Whether or not a particular pronouncement (technically called a precedent) by a judge sitting in court when deciding a case does become binding (according to the doctrine of "stare decisis" - stand by what has previously been decided) ...read more.


The reasoning must be a matter pertaining to the law rather than a factual decision. In addition, the pronouncement must not be obiter dictum - something said either about the law or the facts of the case which is "by the way", in other words, not strictly necessary for the legal basis for the decisions. Only the ratio decidendi will be binding. It will comprise the legal principles and rules which are necessary to solve the problem before the court. Obiter dicta are not binding, but they may be treated as of "persuasive authority" - later judges are entitled to read them and be influenced by them, but they are not obliged to follow these parts of judicial pronouncements. We can summarise these rules -as the doctrine of precedent (or, to use lawyers' language, the doctrine of stare decisis). A later judge will have to determine (i) what pronouncements from earlier decisions are binding and (ii) ...read more.


So when we think of laws in modern times, we often think of sections in an Act of Parliament. Statutes can be applied to all or any combination of jurisdictions within the United Kingdom, whereas the common law jurisdictions are more limited. Acts of Parliament which apply to everyone throughout one or more jurisdictions are called public general Acts. But Acts may also be limited to geographical locations within a jurisdiction (e.g. the W est Yorkshire Act 1980 and local bye-laws) or to specific persons or companies. Reasons for the use of delegated legislation are as follows: * to save time in Parliament - the time taken to scrutinize statutory instruments is often zero or, at most, an hour or two; * to allow for expert input into their design and technical language to be used in their wording * to allow flexibility in responding to events and representations There are also powers under the Local Government Act 1972 for local authorities to issue delegated legislation - these are called bye-laws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Tort Law in Malaysia

    Even though there are two exceptions in this principle, it may be in some circumstances, as in Wain v. F Sherwood Ltd.23 became unjust to the plaintiff.( In Wain's case, the plaintiff failed in bringing a second action in respect of his back injury failed.)

  2. Explain the relationship between the common law (judge made law), and the following historical ...

    In the case of R V R (Rape: Marital Exemption)16 the Court of Appeal and then the House of Lords declared that even within marriage, sexual offence should be considered.

  1. Free essay

    Legal systems - Comparison between Civil Law and Common Law

    A consequence of this fundamental difference between the two systems is that lawyers from the civil law countries tend to be more conceptual, while lawyers from the common law countries are considered to be more pragmatic".

  2. 'The role of the judge is to declare what the law is, and not ...

    An example of the Criminal court of Appeal departing from its previous decision to create justice in individual cases was in R v Gould 1968, (that overruled the previous case of R v Wheat & Stocks 1921 ) where an honest belief that a previous marriage had failed was a suitable defence to a bigamy charge.

  1. Do Judges Make New Law in Hard Cases?

    Primary rules being the recognised substantive rules regulating behaviour in all soceities. In developed legal systems these primary rules had subservient secondary rules which enabled them to function. The secondary rules provided a mechanism for the primary rules to be changed and enforced; and being generally known to society provided

  2. Judges Make Law

    However since the Lord Chancellor's Practice Statement 2 says that the House of Lords can depart from it own previous decision. A leading case to illustrate this is R v R 3 where rape within a marriage is a crime.

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    law, materially modify an existing principle of law, or settle a doubtful question of law. Also included are questions of interpretation of statutes and important cases illustrating new applications of existing principles. It is sometimes argued that the courts themselves should take over the production of Reports from the private

  2. Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

    * Specialist Posts 1. Lord chancellor - Head of Judiciary - Member of Government HOL - Member of cabinet - �171,000 per year 2. Lord Chief Justice - COA (criminal division) - �171,000 3. Master Of Roles - COA (civil division)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work