• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

University Degree: Equity & Trust Law

Browse by
Word count:
fewer than 1000 (3)
1000-1999 (22)
2000-2999 (35)
3000+ (19)

Meet our team of inspirational teachers

find out about the team

Get help from 80+ teachers and hundreds of thousands of student written documents

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  1. The Fusion Fallacy. When considering the relationship between equitable compensation and common law damages, evidence suggests that there are strong similarities now emerging between the two, and it is difficult to draw meaningful distinctions between th

    essay as 'fusion' is not as far-fetched a concept as some jurists would like it to be, and the 'fusion fallacy' is in fact, a fallacy in itself. According to the 'general limb' of the fusion fallacy as proposed by conservatives Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies, 'foreign concepts' cannot be imported from one jurisdiction into the other.5 More specifically, the first limb of the fusion fallacy which is central to the arguments put forth in this essay implies remedies from one jurisdiction cannot go in support of rights in the other jurisdiction where that was unattainable before

    • Word count: 3269
  2. Are trustees too powerful?

    a duty of confidence imposed on a trustee in respect of particular property and positively enforceable by a person".5 The duties that trustees hold extend to areas such as a general duty to obey and familiarize the "terms of the conditions, history as well as the management of the trust, as well as a total compliance with the terms unless directed otherwise by the courts, the duty to safeguard the trust assets and making sure it meets the conditions of the trust instruments, the duties further extend to the ability to avoid conflict of interests, as well as acting with

    • Word count: 3894
  3. In order to critically assess the way in which the law acts to resolve disputes between cohabitants over right in the family home, an analysis of the historical and current developments of the common law governing this area will be presented.

    Hence, in practice, the courts through the application of section 53(2) LPA, use the law of resulting, implied or constructive trusts in an attempt to settle disputes between cohabitants.8 Although this approach provides the flexibility of equity, it is not uncommon to find contradictory judgments throughout the decades. The starting point stems from Dyer v Dyer9 where under the presumption of resulting trust, a trust of legal estate would result in favour of the man who advances the purchase money.10 Thus, a cohabitant who wished to prove that a property purchased in their partner's sole name was intended to be beneficially shared, would have to rebut this presumption of resulting trust.

    • Word count: 1928
  4. "It is submitted that this case [i.e. Pennington v Waine] dangerously undermines the established principles that equity will not act to perfect an imperfect gift nor assist a volunteer. The effectiveness of an alleged transfer of property should not depen

    Although some may rebut this argument and claim that the increased flexibility for the court is a good thing, the uncertainty and legal confusion caused by the decision substantially outweighs any possible advantages. Although the principle dates back to Ellison v Ellison (1802)9, it has been cited in many cases as the general rule of law, most notably in Milroy v Lord10, where the transferor (Milroy) had signed a voluntary deed purporting to transfer shares in the Bank of Louisiana to Mr Lord.

    • Word count: 3505
  5. Constitution Of Trusts Problem Question - in order to decide whether Nixon is entitled to sell his farm, we must establish whether he has effectively declared himself trustee.

    valid declaration (following the criteria in Milroy v Lord2), he will not be able to reclaim the farm back3, because he will no longer own it for himself, but he will own it as a trustee for the benefit of his son, Ronald. As a result, constitution of trusts need not be discussed. However, certain requirements must be followed in order to decide whether the self-declaration was effective. Firstly, there must be present, clear and irrevocable declaration of trust as in the case of Re Cozens4.

    • Word count: 3189
  6. Equity and Trusts - Scenario based. There are many types of trusts[1]; this assignment is about express trusts[2]. Lord Langdale formulated the tests for three certainties where to have a valid trust there must be the certainty of intention, subject matt

    Unless there are other farms under his name, then this certainty will fail. In Re London Wine,12 the claim failed because the 'wine' had not been separated from the main stock, this was not ascertainable.13 'The settlor shall have identified the persons who are to benefit under the trust.'14 We have a beneficiary here, his 'brother Mohammed', under a fixed trust there has to be conceptual certainty and evidential certainty15, we are able to list all the beneficiaries and as well as this documents can be produced to prove it16. Formalities for land are governed by the Law of Property Act 1925.17 S53(1)(b)18 states that a declaration of trust in land, made inter vivos, must be proved in writing19.

    • Word count: 2939
  7. Equity came not to destroy the law but to fulfil it Maitland. Critically discuss this statement in light of the role equity plays in todays legal system.

    Equity presupposed the extension of common law at every point. It accepted the common law rules on any question that might arise, but added that something more was necessary, either because the common law rule was inadequate, or because it caused hardship There was no inherent conflict between the doctrines of Equity and Law, their practical working has also been harmonious. However equity has a haphazard origin and is not a complete system. Its working principles are embodied in the so-called theories of Equity. These principles do not cover the whole ground of equity and tend to overlap.

    • Word count: 2580
  8. Equity Coursework

    may occur by an outright transfer by way of gift, by way of a transfer to trustees to hold on trust or by a declaration of trust7. She builds on this view by stating, "It is axiomatic from Turner L.J.'s statement of the law that an unsuccessful attempt to achieve a voluntary settlement by one of the three methods will not be construed as a successful attempt via the other methods."8 She concludes this point by stating that the methods of achieving a settlement by transfer will depend on the type of property involved9.

    • Word count: 3992
  9. Can equity perfect an imperfect gift?

    He may declare himself as a trustee of the property, holding it for the beneficiaries or he may transfer the property to a third party who will hold it on trust for the intended beneficiaries.9 Once the declaration or transfer has taken place, the trustees then hold the legal title to the property contained with the trust for the beneficiary. They are said to have an interest in the trust property that can be enforced through equity if necessary. Historically the law seemed to very clearly defined and simple to understand.

    • Word count: 4289

    The writing is only required as evidence of the declaration (see, Foster v Hale (1798) 3 Ves 696). Thus, the writing of the actual declaration is not necessary as long as there is written evidence of it (see, Deg v Deg (1727) 2 Wms 412; Hill v Hill [1947] Ch 231) which contains all the material terms of the trust (i.e. the beneficiaries' names, the subject matter and the nature of the trust) (see, Hawkins v Price [1947] Ch 645; Smith v Matthews (1861)

    • Word count: 1984
  11. The essence of the [beneficiary] principle is that for a trust to exist, there must be someone other than the trustee who has the real beneficial ownership of the trust property. If there is no such person, then not only is there no person to enf

    Explanation for the beneficiary principle Since the beneficiary principle has the greatest impact on non-charitable purpose trusts, I will examine the explanations for this orthodox requirement with reference to these trusts. These are the trusts where the trust property is held for the furtherance of an objective. In D. Hayton's article, he highlights the number of jurisdictions that allows non-charitable purpose trusts. It, therefore, seems odd that they are still prohibited under English trusts law. The explanation the strict requirement of beneficiaries can be examined "in terms of obligation and enforcement" 2.

    • Word count: 1534
  12. Trusts Essay on Fiduciary Duties

    This problem arises where a law firm may have more than one client and raises the 'duty of undivided loyalty' principle that a solicitor owes his client.7 It is imperative to understand why we need to pay special heed to conflicts of interest rules when it comes to law firms before delving into the effects and consequences the rules have on law firms. Over the past two decades there have been major changes within the legal profession that have led the issue of conflicts of interest to cause a stir.

    • Word count: 6437
  13. Critically assess the view that equity remains a separate set of rules to those of the common law despite the enactment of the Judicature Acts.

    It also illustrates supremacy of Community law, since a court is bound to set aside national law if it conflicts with Community law.4 A Member State cannot enforce a Directive against an individual who has breached Community law, not national law in criminal proceedings, "Interpreting the relevant rules of its own national law reaches a limit where such an interpretation leads to... liability in criminal law of persons who act in contravention of that Directive's provisions." Per Advocate General Elmer in Luciano Arcaro.5 It is only when a Directive has been fully and correctly implemented that Community obligations may be directly imposed on an individual.

    • Word count: 2796
  14. Equity Case Summaries

    can dispose of his beneficial interest subject to any writing requirements s23C(1) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) 3. has the equitable remedy of tracing with third parties 4. can assert priority except for a bona fide purchaser of the legal estate buying for value, without notice of beneficiary's equitable interest See AG v Bi-Phosphated (1879) 11 Ch D 327 The right of a beneficiary in an unadministered estate Does the interest from date of death to the date of grant have a proprietary nature, particularly for tax purposes? The Livingstone Litigation Livingston v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld)

    • Word count: 19275
  15. Equity Exam Notes

    become part of the general assets of the borrower and should be used for some specific purpose then a trust will be imposed if that purpose fails. Precatory Trusts The words used to express the intention to create a trust must be clear and sometimes the court is called upon to determine whether or not certain words sufficiently achieve this. This usually occurs after the person allegedly creating the trust has died. West v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) - the words 'it is my will and desire' were held to be binding upon the testator's daughter. Re Alston (1955)

    • Word count: 5359
  16. Equity and Trusts

    Precatory words are not conclusive either way. Meaning that the intention of the settlor must be clear and that he intended the trustee to actually be a trustee and not take the trust absolute. Reasons for certainty requirements property is correctly identified and is dealt with in accordance with the wishes of the settlor. The shift from property and monies has changed over the 200 years when the first trusts were introduced exchanging family arrangements. Trusts have to be investigated because some trusts maybe fraudulent. A vested interest in property is needed for the trustee to carry out the trust. This had lead to the certainty requirements.

    • Word count: 972
  17. “The Insolvency Act 1986 gives the court the power to set aside trusts which are created in an attempt to elude personal bankruptcy or corporate insolvency. Similarly, the courts have refused to recognise ‘sham’ trusts where the trust is

    I will demonstrate that the validity of a Quistclose style trust is determined by if or not the judge believes it to be the fair and honest thing to do or not. It is very important to understand what a trust is because a Quistclose trust is not a separate entity in law which judges have developed it is just an ordinary trust which has been given an informal name therefore the same laws apply to Quistclose trusts as to any other trust.

    • Word count: 4658
  18. Legal ownership vested in trustees must be balanced by identifiable equitable ownership. Critically discuss this statement and the difficulties inherent in it in relation to the interests of beneficiaries under discretionary trus

    They differ, however, from administrative powers in that there is no duty to exercise them impartially as between beneficiaries with different interests"ii This shows that the difference between powers and discretionary trusts, as stated above, is that the trustees do not have to act impartially, but rather act in a way they think best, rather than simply acting within rules as set by the testator. The beneficiary of a trust is defined as "the owner of the beneficial interest in the trust property"iii This means that although the trustee has the discretion as to how the trust property is apportioned,

    • Word count: 2388
  19. Certainties of trust P/Q

    It must be said with certainty that 'any given postulant' (individual) is or is not a member of the class 'avid science fiction fans.' This must apply to all individuals. It can inferred however that it maybe uncertain who is an avid science fiction fan. How much interest is needed to become an avid fan? E.g. is it essential for potential beneficiaries to have watched star wars, or attended a majority of science fiction events. It would be very hard to distinguish 'who is and who is not' an avid fan.

    • Word count: 1629
  20. Express Trusts

    did separate between the legal and equitable title, which hints toward to a creation of a trust. This is an express trust as it has been created in accordance with the express intention of Brad (The settlor). It could also be classified further as a fixed trust as Brad has specified in clause 7 of the will the beneficiaries and their interests. Therefore, T&T (The appointed trustees) have no duty to select the beneficiaries or quantify the interest, as Brad has already declared the interests that must be enjoyed by the beneficiaries. "The essence of the express trust is the fiduciary relationship between the beneficiary and a trustee who is vested with the trust property; it is

    • Word count: 2411
  21. Trusts: 3 certainties

    These requirements, known as the three certainties, were classified by Lord Lonsdale in the case of Knight v Knight. These are certainty of intention, (the intention to create a trust is clear), certainty of subject matter (the property intended to be the subject of the trust is identifiable), and certainty of object (the beneficiaries of the trust are clearly identified). Secondly, it is important to consider the formalities for Sally (the settler) to transfer the legal estate in the trust property to Tony (the trustee). As the property is a voluntary settlement - in other words the beneficiaries are providing no consideration for the property- the rule in Milroy v Lord will apply.

    • Word count: 1125
  22. Equity and trust

    Furthermore it becomes clear that 'the words must be imperative'.5 This is evident in the case of Paul-v- Constance [1977] 1 ALL ER 195, where the phrase 'the money is as much yours as it is mine' was accepted by the court as sufficient evidence that he regarded himself as holding the account as trustee for himself and his wife.6 Additionally a further difficulty arises where the settler uses precatory words, which are expressions of hope and desire that the donee will use the property in a certain way.

    • Word count: 3315
  23. Explain to Aberlard of how he may best achieve the following bequests after his death.

    transfers property to another (trustee) is legally obliged to look after or manage the property for third parties (benificiaries). Referring to the above definition of Trust just offered, many terms of the definition offered are abstract or not matters of ordinary usage. Alternatively there are two ways in which a trust can arise, either by way of conscious creation of these obligations or because of some other legally significant matters are present. Effectively there are two main branches of trusts, 'Inter Vivos' trust and a 'Testamentary' trust.

    • Word count: 2509

Conclusion analysis

Good conclusions usually refer back to the question or title and address it directly - for example by using key words from the title.
How well do you think these conclusions address the title or question? Answering these questions should help you find out.

  1. Do they use key words from the title or question?
  2. Do they answer the question directly?
  3. Can you work out the question or title just by reading the conclusion?
  • Question 1: Critically evaluate the extentto which the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 has broughtabout improvements in the law.

    "In conclusion TOLATA abolishes law that is out of date in which does not reflect the living style of the modern times. Furthermore, TOLATA has emphasised the recognition and protection of the beneficiaries rights from that of the protection for the purchaser of land. The courts are also given more power in that they can make an order they feel fit and are not forced to make or refuse order to sell and finally, the remainderman can also now go to court if there have been grievances. 1"

  • Compare the private trust, the trust of imperfect obligation and the charitable trust. What policy ends does the law aim to achieve by it's different treatment of each of these trusts?

    "In conclusion, since charitable trusts enjoy more privileges than private trusts it could be said that stricter laws apply to them and should continue to do so (this can be seen visibly through the Charities Bill 2005) to prove the validity of the trust. Although the main aim of such trusts is to benefit the public, some people may misuse the concept of public benefit to fit their own purpose and abuse the whole aim of charities. In regard to private trust, since they benefit specified individuals the laws are not that strict as compared to charitable trusts. However the laws are strict in that they allow the safeguard of private people, by allowing failed express trust to result back to the settlor as a resulting trust so the courts have provided for future provisions. So in both trusts Parliament has provided for the necessary provisions to take place for the validity of both trusts to prevent corruption and unfairness. WORD LIMIT 2263"

  • Explain the principles relating to certainty of subject matter and critically evaluate the decision in Hunter v Moss.

    "In conclusion it can be seen that no trust can be formed unless it complies with the certainties. Where there is no certainty of subject matter, there can be no trust. The property would then remain with the settlor or if dead will pass by will or the intestacy rules. The trust fund must be identifiable so should be segregated from other property. However it appears there is no need to segregate if the property is intangible, segregation is only necessary in tangible property. 2000 Words"

Marked by a teacher

This document has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the document.

Peer reviewed

This document has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the document page.

Peer reviewed

This document has been reviewed by one of our specialist student document reviewing squad. Read the full review under the document preview on this page.