• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

EU Protection of Fundamental Rights

Extracts from this document...


To what extent does EU law protect fundamental rights? The Preamble of the European Union outlines that: it is necessary to strengthen the protection of fundamental rights in the light of changes in society, social progress and scientific and technological developments by making those rights more visible in a Charter.1 "Core fundamental rights" refer to those "rights", or to those "levels of protection", which are said to be universal, transcending any legitimate cultural or political difference among different societies in, at least, the universe of Europe.2 Neither the Treaty of Paris nor the Treaty of Rome contained any illusion to the protection of fundamental human rights. The initial trigger for the Court's declaration that fundamental rights formed part of the EC legal order was: "the challenge posed to the supremacy of Community law by Member State courts, which felt that EC legislation was encroaching upon important rights protected under national law.3" Once the European Court of Justice, which played a major role in securing the growing awareness of fundamental rights, put in place its constitutional jurisprudence in cases such as Van Gend en Loos4 and Costa5, it became legally and politically imperative that a way had to be found to support fundamental human rights at the Community level.6 In Van Gend en Loos, the ECJ established direct effect, stating that Article 12 should be interpreted "as producing direct effects and reading individual rights". ...read more.


The case discloses how the EU increasingly endeavoured to defend fundamental rights. Individuals can rely on the European Court of Human Rights when fighting for their fundamental rights. Accepted legally binding obligations to secure the classical human rights for all persons within their jurisdiction and to allow all individuals, to bring claims against them leading to a binding judgement by an international court finding them in breach16. In the case of Dudgeon17, the applicant was a shipping clerk and gay activist in Belfast, Ireland. He claimed that the police investigation in relation to his homosexuality was in breach of his right under Article 8 of the ECHR. The Court agreed with the commission that Northern Ireland's criminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults was a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR. However, the ruling continued, "it was for countries to fix for themselves...any appropriate extension of the age of consent in relation to such conduct."Dudgeon's case displays that the EU is inclined to point out at fundamental rights but will not attempt to enforce them. In 1999, the European Council launched an initiative to draft a Charter of Fundamental Rights for the EU. The Charter was solemnly proclaimed by the Commission, Parliament, and Council and was politically approved by the Member States at the Nice European Council summit in 2000. ...read more.


1 5 Costa v ENEL (1964) ECR 585 6 N. A. Neuwahl & A.Rosas, "The Treaty on European Union: A step forward in the protection of Human Rights?", The European Union and Human Rights, (1995), 13 7 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratstelle f�r Getreide und Futtermittel, (1970) ECR 1125 8 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings v Commission [2006] ECR I-7795, Case C-131/03 P 9 P. Craig & G. De Burca, "Human Rights in the EU", EU Law; Text, Cases and Materials, 4th edn, (2007), 418 10 K.P.E. Lasok, "The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance", Law & Institutions, 7th edn., (2001), 306 11 Plaumann & Co v Commission [1963] ECR 95; Case 25/62: 12 Stauder v City of Ulm [1969] ECR 419, Case 29/69 13 P. Craig & G. De Burca, ,"Human Rights in the EU", EU Law; Text, Cases and Materials, 4th edn, (2007), 318 14 http://www.mifsudbonnici.com/lexnet/articles/artgenprinc.html 15 Carpenter v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 11 June 2002, ECR 2002 16 D.J. Harris, M. O'Boyle, C. Warbrick, "The Convention and the European Union", Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, (1995), 29 17 Dudgeon v UK [1981] ECHR 7525/76 18 http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/rights/fsj_rights_intro_en.htm 19 Karlsson and Others" 20 D. Mancini and D. Keeling, "From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge Facing the European Court" (1991) 11 YBEL 1, 11-12. 21 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/default_en.htm 22 http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l33501.htm 23 http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l33501.htm Christian Hidalgo 06205165 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Assignment in EU Law

    (Para 27 von Colson case). In Marleasing15 ECJ took it one-step further than the Von Colson principle, CJ held that the principle could be applied even if necessary national legislation had not been introduced to comply with the directive. Applying this principle, Monique should get seven months payment for her redundancy because the (Imaginary)

  2. The EU is 'fundamentally undemocratic', discuss.

    Decision making happens by consensus or qualified majority voting- often behind closed doors"7 The matter of democracy is easier to tackle and obvious points to the responsibility of the European Parliament as the only directly elected organisation but only having an insignificant task in the legislative progression and the query

  1. Company Law and Corporate Governance

    Bill being given Royal Assent30. When the scandal of Enron happened, the United Kingdom was productively looking into corporate governance, ahead of the rest of the globe. The only floor the United Kingdom saw in their corporate governance codes was regarding Non-Executive Directors, a cautious apprehension the DTI wanted to consult31.

  2. EU Freedom of Establishment. In this essay I will discuss the definition of establishment ...

    4.6 This case can be viewed as the court prompting MS to move forward on the harmonisation of Company law; a hint which was ignored by the MS. 5 A discrimination based test: 5.1 Equal Treatment is implicit in Article 49 TFEU which sets out that in the absence of


    Once goods are imported into a Member State, they must be allowed to move freely in all other Member States without the payment of any further customs duties. Thus, the free movement of goods notion is based very much on the concept of a Customs Union.

  2. impact of the Treaty of Lisbon

    Title II of the TEU, a new introduction by the ToL, contains the democratic principles on which the Union is founded. Central to this title is the provision governing the role of national parliaments in the EU's policy making process.

  1. Discussing the cases of Van Gend En Loos (Case 26/62), Von Colson (14/83) and ...

    The Van Gend en Loos criteria are now the test for the application of direct effect for provisions of EC law. Furthermore, the Court of Justice in a later case allowed for Treaties to have both vertical and horizontal direct effect: (the horizontal effect of Treaties being clarified in the case of Defrenne v Sabena (Case 43/75)4)

  2. EU Law

    Since there is doubt a reference can be made to the ECJ under Art 234 to determine whether or not the adjudicator is acting as a court or tribunal. Thirdly, given the status of the social services adjudicator who was appointed by the local council, arguably it appears to lack independence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work