• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Family Law Supervision

Extracts from this document...


Family Law Supervision 8 Essay Q.6 Janet and Keith, aged 19 and 20, separated when their daughter Lucy was a few weeks old. Keith left the district suddenly, apparently unable to cope with the responsibility and did not maintain any contact with Janet or Lucy. Lucy is now eighteen months old. Keith has returned and asked Janet for a reconciliation, saying that he regrets his irresponsible action and that he sincerely wants to be fully involved in Lucy's life. He has found a stable job and is prepared to be a devoted father from now on. Janet wants nothing to do with Keith. She does not believe he has changed at all and in any case she has made a new life for herself and Lucy. She is about to move in with Martin Smith, who lives with his two children by a previous marriage. She wants Lucy to regard Martin as her father, and to this end wants to change Lucy's surname to Smith. Moreover, Janet and Martin plan to emigrate to Australia. Keith is violently opposed, and wants to know what his rights are and whether and how he can stop Janet from taking these steps. Advise Keith on the basis that: (a) Keith and Janet are married and Janet has instituted divorce proceedings; (b) ...read more.


'the likely effect on him of any change in his circumstances'. When looking at these factors, it is obvious that forcing Lucy to live with Keith would not be appropriate as she has no connection with him yet. It could also be argued, as in the case of Brixey v. Lynas that Lucy needs to stay with her mother. The court in this case gave very strong weight to the proposition that a very young child needs to be with its mother and based this on common knowledge. This is similar to Lucy because Lucy has been with her mother since birth and so it would not be in her best interests to split them. However, there is increasing judicial enthusiasm for shared residence orders. Looking at the case of D v. D the court granted a shared residence order even though the mother and father were living in different jurisdictions. In relation to a Contact Order, there will be a strong presumption that Lucy should have contact with her father as this is generally recognised as being in the best interests if the child in the great majority of cases. Applying Re R (minor) (contact: biological father) Keith will have a very strong chance of being granted a Contact Order. In this case the child had been brought up to believe that the mother's partner was the natural father and had actually not seen the real father for 3 years (less time than Lucy's situation) ...read more.


In order for Keith to obtain parental responsibility he will need to either: (a) be granted it from Janet (which is unlikely); (b) apply to the court for an order granting it; or (c) obtain a Residence Order which automatically confers parental responsibility. The best option would be for Keith to apply under the Children Act 1989 s.4 for an order granting parental responsibility as this procedure would be a 'family proceeding' under which the other relevant orders that Keith wants can be granted. In assessing whether the grant Keith parental responsibility the court will look at the degree of commitment Keith has shown towards Lucy (which is not very much so far); the degree of attachment which exists between them (not vary much, however this is not completely attributable to Keith as Janet has refused contact); and the reasons the father has for applying for the order (which have great weight). Because the welfare test also applies to these proceedings it is likely that Keith will be granted parental responsibility as it will be in Lucy's best interests for Keith to be involved in decisions in her life (eg if he needs to give consent to emergency treatment). Also, it has been said that is it overwhelmingly in the child's interests for both parents to have parental responsibility (Re P (minor) (Parental Responsibility Order). Once Keith has parental responsibility he will be able to proceed with applications for the s.8 orders in the way described above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Family Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Family Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The distinctions between void and voidable marriages serve no purpose in modern family law ...

    4 star(s)

    If such a small percentage of the petitions are granted, is the whole idea of nullity relevant to today's society? Many people choose not to dissolve their marriage due to traditional or religious reasons.

  2. Who has parental responsibility & what is the significance in having it?

    Therefore despite the existence of procedures to obtain parental responsibility, these remained largely inadequate. Many felt that the discrimination between married and unmarried fathers was unsatisfactory and did not reflect modern society where around 30% of all children are born to unmarried parents.

  1. Marriage in family law

    After the deceased died the homosexual partner of the deceased Mr Fitzpatrick claimed to have a right under the Rent Act 1977 to succeed to the tenancy. For the purposes of the Rent Act 1977 the then House Of Lords decided that a gay or lesbian couple could be classed as a family.

  2. Surrogacy in New Zealand

    conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $100,000, or both. It is arguable that the HART Act was enacted to protect the traditional New Zealand family values of not mixing business with pleasure, allowing that an altruistic surrogate mother would fit the family values of being an unselfish, decent and generous person.

  1. Changes in Patterns of Marriages and Divorce may Reflect Changing Views of the Place ...

    In 1981 the Marriage rate in the Britain was 7.1% but by 2001 it was down to 5.1 %. In 2002 according to general household survey those aged 16-59, 25 % were cohabiting. General household statistics on cohabitation have been collected since 1979.Between 1979 and 2001 the proportion of 18-49 years old cohabiting has increased from 11% to 32%/.

  2. Family law.

    In Child and Family Law16 two methods of defining a family are examined. The first one 'embraces a clearly defined notion of the family'17. This sentiment, examined earlier suggests that a family is 'a group of people related to each other through blood or by marriage'.

  1. Free essay

    Discuss the Children Act's Welfare Principle. Section 1 of the Children Act 1989 ...

    Therefore, if the welfare principle was to take this literal meaning under the ECHR, it would not comply. Emily Jackson heavily criticises the use of the welfare principle under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 199028, arguing: "Extending the 'welfare principle' to decisions taken prior to a child's conception is

  2. Problem Question, Divorce& FInancial Provision

    taken into account.[37]However if petitioner react unreasonably to the respondent?s behaviour the petitioner may fail. [38] The MCA 1973 provides two statutory protections for the respondent to a divorce petition. Firstly, s5[39] enables a respondent to defend a divorce based on the fact of five years? separation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work