• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Homicide. Unlawful killing is when and a person of sound mind and of the age of discretion can commit the actus Reus of murder by unlawfully killing another person. This means that the defendant in a murder case must be legally responsible for his actions

Extracts from this document...


Homicide The act of homicide is broken down in English law to murder and manslaughter, in other countries such as the USA murder or manslaughter is usually referred to just as homicide. In the USA murder is broken down into different degrees however in English law it is not, it is murder which follows with a mandatory life sentence. There can be various different types of manslaughter dependent on the situation and very different aspects involved with the crime itself. Unlawful killing is when and a person of sound mind and of the age of discretion can commit the actus Reus of murder by unlawfully killing another person. This means that the defendant in a murder case must be legally responsible for his actions and cannot be classed as insane, cannot have committed the crime under diminished responsibility and has to be a person and not a corporation. Currently in England the age of criminal responsibility is 10 years old, over the years there have been calls for this to be raised to 12 and in some cases 14, this would follow many other countries throughout the world. ...read more.


It was held that the doctor's decision not to operate on was reasonable as the head injuries incurred in the attack were the significant cause of the victim's demise. The defendant was rightly convicted of manslaughter as in criminal cases the blame cannot be apportioned. The defendants act doesn't need to the sole or man cause of death, it is sufficient that their acts significantly contributed to the demise of the victim. When a person unlawfully kills someone it is automatically classed as murder, however the charge can be reduced to manslaughter on various different grounds. Diminished responsibility and provocation are two grounds used when attempting to have a charge reduced to manslaughter. The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 replaced S.2 of the Homicide Act 1957 by stating "A person who kills or is party to the killing of another is not to be convicted of murder if D was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning"2 this then was broken down into different parts; firstly if the defendants actions arose from a recognised medical condition3; the abnormality of mental functioning substantially impaired D's ability to do one or more things mentioned in sub section [1A]4 and provides an explanation for the defendants acts and omissions in doing or being party to the killing. ...read more.


original trial but the court of appeal admitted the evidence which was that the defendant had suffered years of abuse from her husband eventually suffering from battered woman's syndrome, which is also referred to as post traumatic stress disorder. The syndrome is recognised by the courts as the constant abuse the women incur can lead to sudden temporary loss of self control and can be seen to amount to diminished responsibility. So providing the defendant is able to establish and prove they were suffering from a total loss of self control or diminished responsibility could be proved then the charge can be reduced to voluntary manslaughter. Homicide is a broad term which is generally why it isn't a word normally associated with the English Legal System. We have it broken down into different sections to make it clearer and easier for all concerned to understand the differences between the indictments and the punishments that are involved as well as breaking down what has to be involved on each individual basis. One thing is certain, for a murder charge to stick the defendant must have no excuse for killing the victim, the actus reus and mens rea must fully be present in the case for the conviction to be safe. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

A fine essay. A tighter writing style will improve this essay.

4 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 05/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "There is no statutory definition of intention in English law. Indeed, over the past ...

    5 star(s)

    made between murder and manslaughter altogether, which would disregard the accused's state of mind and the circumstances26. Or perhaps a definition contemplating aim, including foreseeing a consequence as certain, but not foresight as a virtual certainty27. In 2006 the Law Commission deliberated such codification of the definition of intention28 which

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Chain of causation problem question. The given case is concerned with the law ...

    4 star(s)

    The lack of intention for murder means that the charge would be for involuntary manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter is of three types: Constructive manslaughter, Gross Negligence manslaughter, and Reckless Manslaughter. Of these reckless manslaughter is applicable to a limited number of cases and generally does not appear in courts.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Justice System of Great Britain

    4 star(s)

    Once the jury are sworn in they are obligated to attend all hearings regarding the case. It is imperative that the jurors do not disclose any information regarding the trial to anyone not involved in the proceedings. They must remain honest and unbiased throughout.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Justice, Miscarriages of justice

    4 star(s)

    Similarly the Home Secretary had to refer the offender to the Parole Board before he/she could be considered for release. This was reviewed by the House of Lords in November 2002 in R v Secretary of state for the Home Department (ex parte Anderson and others)

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

    4 star(s)

    There is also criticisms on the fact that the CPS often reduce the charge against the defendant, making it out to be a less serious offence than it actually is and to what the evidence shows. Due to this fact there is a higher rate of the defendant to plead

  2. Concept of criminal liability - revision notes.

    He doesn't put the fire out but just moves to another room to sleep. The building is fire damaged. * Special Situations -R v Speck 1977 -Man watching little girls in a park. One of the 8 year old girls gives him oral sex.

  1. After Woollin, the law of Intention remains unclear, but nonetheless works in a satisfactory ...

    turn of life support machines knowing that the consequences may result in death, yet if it is proven to be in the best interest of the patient then it can be deemed as lawful. âThe defence of double effect cancels out the effect of the bad consequences by an intention

  2. Criminal Law - Defining Intention

    police, he just wanted to escape, and therefore he could not be convicted of murder. The House of Lords upheld the conviction of murder, saying that if an ?ordinary man? would have ?contemplated? the end result then the necessary intention was proved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work