• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the provisions of Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 and Part VII of the Merchant Shipping (Registration of Shipping Vessels) Regulations 1988 threaten the livelihoods of Factortame? On what grounds did they claim the provisions were contrary to European Economic Community law? Why was the prohibition they were seeking so urgent?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did the provisions of Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 and Part VII of the Merchant Shipping (Registration of Shipping Vessels) Regulations 1988 threaten the livelihoods of Factortame? On what grounds did they claim the provisions were contrary to European Economic Community law? Why was the prohibition they were seeking so urgent? The provisions of Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 and Part VII of the Merchant Shipping (Registration of Shipping Vessels) Regulations 1988 threatened the livelihoods of the applicants as they set up a new structure for the registration of British vessels and barred the registration or the continuing registration of any fishing vessels to continue beyond 31 March 1989 that were not compliant with the Act. ...read more.

Middle

The applicants wanted relief as they found that the provisions of Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 and Part VII of the Merchant Shipping (Registration of Shipping Vessels) Regulations 1988 could not apply to them as it is contrary to EEC law. It was already established that Community law was above national law in all matters. The act introduced a new system of registration of British fishing vessels and ruled that previously registered vessels could have their registrations suspended after a specified time. They claimed that the provisions were contrary to EEC law in a number of facets and utilized the Treaty of Rome to prove their views. ...read more.

Conclusion

The magnitude of the decision?s aftermath would be a deciding factor in whether or not the applicants could continue fishing in the UK and if they could register their vessels after the set deadline. This prohibition would halt the Secretary of State for Transport from terminating the existing registrations of vessels unless they satisfied Section 14 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988.[6] [1] Gavin Drewry ?The jurisprudence of British Euroscepticism: A strange banquet of fish and vegetables? (2007) 3(2) Utrecht Law Review 101. [2] R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd and Others [1989] 2 CMLR 353. [3] Ibid. [4] Ibid. [5] Ibid. [6] Ibid. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    [FN46] or from showing specific intent to achieve a monopoly, where there is a dangerous probability of their success (attempted monopolisation), while the latter prohibits price discrimination practices that are reasonably likely to harm competition. [FN47] In this line of decisions, the element of "intent" or "will" was thus satisfied by proof of pricing below some appropriate measure of cost.

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    Even where the courts do consider measures justified on grounds of public policy, Steiner69 observes that "the courts prefer different grounds" to protect from safeguarding states. In Campus Oil[1983]70 a measure ensuring the viability of the Irish National Petroleum Co.'s economic viability in the event of an emergency by obliging

  1. EU Law - age discrimination and market access case studies.

    Looking at paragraph 16 of Keck; which states that if the measure relates to the selling arrangements of the product, then they don't fall under Article 34. Firstly, the measure has to apply to all relevant traders operating within the national territories, which is true, as the Danish law prohibits all traders from advertising jewellery in teen magazines.

  2. Law of the European Union

    it is dependant on implementation by the government Regardless of the fact that only one of this criteria has been fulfilled, it does not necessarily mean that the directive is not capable of having direct effect.

  1. European Law

    vetoing the directive,8 the Commission may have taken an enforcement action to carry a message forward, in a Union where there are more than 25 member states, that it is the objective of the Directive that holds more ground, in this case health and safety of workers, than what a

  2. EU Law

    Is established by law ? Is permanent ? Is independent ? Has compulsory jurisdiction ? Has procedures that are inter partes ? Applies rules of law Through subsequent cases following Broekmeulen there has been a decision that not all the foregoing factors have to be satisfied.

  1. European Union Law.

    In the absence of any rule of community law on the quality of [cheese] products, the Member States retain the power to apply rules of that kind to cheese producers established within their territory. This power extends not only to rules considered necessary for the protection of the consumer or

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    However it should be noted that because Article 30 derogates from a central principle of the Single Market, the exceptions it contains are all narrowly construed and restrictively defined and applied. As a consequence the United Kingdom Government would need to establish a cogent argument in order to persuade the EU enforcement authorities that exemption was justified on the facts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work