• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the Poor Law Amendment Act mark a turning point in attitudes and state provision towards the poor?

Extracts from this document...


How far did the Poor Law Amendment Act mark a turning point in attitudes and state provision towards the poor? The Poor Law Commission of 1832 marked a significant turning point in attitudes and state provision towards the poor. The Commission gave birth to much greater knowledge of the poor, caused British society to replace their paternalistic attitude with utilitarianism, established the Poor Law Amendment Act and changed dominant class running the poverty. Therefore great reforms occurred as a result of the Poor Law Commission however, the many restrictions and flaws of the commission limit the impact it has as a turning point in attitudes and state provision towards the poor. Before the establishment of the Poor Law Commission in 1832, the poorest members of British society were the responsibility of individual parishes and, as the poor were not the responsibility of the government and the upper-class, knowledge of the unreformed poor law was very limited. ...read more.


Intellectuals such as Malthus and Ricardo began to highlight the flaws of the Old system by raising awareness of serious issues which would arise from the Old Poor Law. However, such views had no great impact on the majority until after the findings of the Commission, when people were more prepared to listen to what intellectuals were saying. In particular Jeremy Bentham's doctrine of 'utilitarianism' was at the center of the shift away from paternalism and the nation now believed his theory of 'the greatest happiness for the greatest majority'. Therefore the Commission of 1832 marked a turning point in the attitudes of British society towards the poor as the nation went from their paternalistic approach to adopting a utilitarianistic attitude and the views of anti-Old Poor Law intellectuals would have much more influence. As the position of intellectuals became of great value, so did their solution to reforming the Old Poor Law. Jeremy Bentham's suggestion of establishing 250 industry houses and the abolition of 'outdoor' relief came into practice under a large Government legislation known as the Poor Law Amendment Act which, was a direct result of the Commission. ...read more.


Although the Poor Law Commission was a marked a major turning point in the way society and the state dealt with the poor, its limitations restricts its impact as a turning point. The investigation only covered 10% of Britain's parishes and the methods the assistant commissioners used to gather evidence, were inefficient and inappropriate. Most importantly however, the commissioners had already come to their conclusions before the investigation was conducted and merely intended to use its findings as a tool to reform the poor laws. In conclusion, despite the fact that Poor Law Commission of 1832 had a predetermined aim and does not live up to modern accuracy, it was a ground-breaking survey for its time. The Commission must be recognised as a massive turning point as, not only did it end a system which had been in the works since 1601 but it changed ownership of poverty, gave government control of issues which had previously been out of their hands, ended traditional society and paternalism and also started the welfare state ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. 'The Land Registration Act 2002 makes a poor attempt at reforming the law of ...

    However despite this decision the case of 'Buckingham CC v Moran',11 gave a somewhat different result, here the defendant incorporated land owned by the Council into his garden and by means of a new gate and lock had ensured that access to the land could only be gained via his own land.

  2. Insanity, diminished responsibility and automatism.

    Modern Law Review P.548 39 Stingel v Regina [1990] 171 CLR 312 40 DPP v Camplin [1978] 2 All ER 168 at P174 41 Regina v Smith (Morgan) [2001] 1 AC 146-Smith suffered from severe depression, was drinking and arguing with his friend and stabbed him.

  1. Following the McPherson report and subsequent Race Relations Amendment Act 2000 there is no ...

    There was a serious doubt as to whether the RRA 1976 bound the police as illustrated in the case Farah v Police of Metropolis93. Police officers are liable for racial discrimination when providing assistance/protection to the public but the Act94.


    He argue that "... the allowance system encouraged laziness, drunkness and early marriages with their attendant large families" ( Jenkins, 2002, p. 136) He also believed that if the Poor Laws were abolished this would lead to higher wages because without the poor-rates employers would be able to pay better wages.

  1. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Old Poor Law. Do you agree with ...

    The abolition therefore, did not at all radically change ground that was set by the Old Poor Laws. The reason why abolition was such a good idea was because the Old Poor Law had constantly struggled through times of crisis.

  2. Analyse and evaluate how poor people were treated in British society between 1601 and ...

    It was the responsibility of each parish to accommodate its poor with such mobility amongst paupers their parish of responsibility was often difficult to determine. According to Fraser (2003) a national pattern emerged of mass litigation regarding where responsibility lay for mobile paupers.

  1. Why Was the Poor Law Reformed in 1834?

    The parish overseers were not paid, but elected locals and this lead to widespread corruption, with self-interest being at the heart of local practise (Gregg 1973 p182). Also, due to the changing economic climate, where previously having local overseers had been effective because of small, close-knit communities, industrialisation had seen

  2. How successful was the Victorian poor law?

    It was also meant to relieve the taxpayers from the increasing costs of relief. The extent of an able-bodied pauper's need depended on the whether he was prepared to enter the workhouse. However, the conditions of the workhouse were to be less attractive - less eligible than 'the situation of the independent labourer of the working class.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work