• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HOW FAR IS THE IDEA OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS AN ILLUSION?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW FAR IS THE IDEA OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS AN ILLUSION? The modern notion of human rights was born in the direct aftermath of World War II. It is indeed with the discovery of the atrocities committed by the Nazi forces that a strong "Never Again" political stream arose in the international community, culminating with the adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human rights. Since that day, human rights have been established as a major and legitimate focus of international attention. In the half century since, hundreds of universal, regional or national agreements governing human rights issues have arisen. Yet, in the meantime, major breaches of human rights have been witnessed from South America (Chile, Argentina) to Far East Asia (North Korea, China) on what appears to be a worldwide scale. Even more frightening is the constatation that these breaches are often committed in or by states that are parties to one or more treaties on Human Rights. Such a situation could have been understood in the light of the statu quo existing during the Cold War, when the ideological division of the world was the first concern. But as stated by Farer & Gaer: In the wake of the Cold War the UN has finally become an agent for democratisation and minority protection. ...read more.

Middle

Some solutions to the problem have already been found particularly with the growing influence of some effective regional agreements (the European Convention on Human Rights for example), the growing influence of the non governmental organizations (Amnesty International, Doctors without Borders) and the already quoted trials of war criminals from Kosovo and Rwanda. Nevertheless, these examples are exceptions in a world where Human Rights are hardly enforced. US ambassador Morris Abram once described the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the idea of Human Rights as little more than an empty vessel into which vague hopes and inchoate expectations can be poured, a dangerous incitement, and even preposterous. With as much disregard but much more objectivism, the soviet delegate Andrei Vyshinsky used to say the Universal declaration was a letter to Santa Claus. Neither Nature, experience, nor probability informs these lists of entitlements, which are subjects to no constraint except those of the mind and appetite of their authors[3]. Indeed, reports routinely pinpoint the promoters of Human Rights as perpetrators of consequent violations of those rights. Yet, there is no Human Rights enforcement system apart from the great powers, decisively the USA. Being judges and parties, these powers do little to comply with the international standards of Human rights in their behaviour. ...read more.

Conclusion

To conclude with, one must reckon that la raison dtat (the political imperatives) is too often interfering with the possibility of enforcing Human Rights. This fact is to be regretted for those rights which have priority over other rights may have an extensive core which is inviolable even in state of emergency[5]. Nevertheless, a practical example of Human Rights enforcement is to be found in the European experience. On this model, observers are often recommending the three following way of enforcing Human Rights: Customary international law based on protection established through the UN Charter, universal treaty regimes collectively called the International Bill of Rights in some part reliant on enforcement by UN organs, increasing of the influence of regional treaties as the ECHR.[6] ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 25/05/2007 [1] Karl Meyer, enforcing human rights, in www.worldpolicy.com. [2] Oona Hathaway, Global Legal Information & Human Rights in the 21st Century, in www.worldpolicy.com [3] Both quoted by Noam Chomsky in Rogue States, Pluto press, 2000, chapter 9, p. 112-113. [4] Steven Donziger, The real war on crime: The report of the National Criminal Justice Commission, HarperCollins, 1996. [5] Tom Campbell, Realizing Human Rights in Human Rights: from rhetoric to reality, Blackwell, 1986, p.11. [6] www.udhr.org ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Human Rights

    Indeed, there was at the time a strong reaction against the idea of a global conflict taking place 20 years only after the devastating World War I. But whether recent or old, the concept of Human Rights has been developed in a world dominated by the occident and its civilization

  2. Does the law on terrorism reflect a tendency in the UK to pass authoritarian ...

    of authoritarian anti-terrorist measures in occident: According to John Strawson, "In some way, September 11 has returned law to Ground Zero. The attacks on New York, Washington and Pennsylvania appear to have disturbed legal cultures. International law has been revealed as feeble, constitutional law as insecure while Human rights law has become negotiable"15.

  1. 'Martin Luther King played the major role in the Civil Rights Movement 1955-68. Without ...

    He had now helped pass the Civil rights Act which nobody else could do at the time. This Act gave black people rights which they thought they would never have in their life time. Martin Luther King could perhaps be called the major influence in the civil rights movement because

  2. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    People would do this because they are guided by natural laws, which prevent them from coming into conflict with each other, and since people are rational, they understand that living according to these natural laws is best. Individuals also have the right to punish those who violate the natural law

  1. How have law and international institutions sought to promote human rights globally? To what ...

    Former Yugoslavia, they were then removed as the priority of overcoming human rights abuses was overridden by economic considerations. This has been seen a lot in China too where access to its exports and home market is regarded as more important on balance that human rights issues.

  2. Essay on how judges decide cases

    It is an amalgamation of different processes and reasoning to produce an appropriate and ultimate conclusion. No judge will ever be like the superhuman Hercules. Each may have their different and varied ways of coming to conclusions and each may be fallible.

  1. Detention violates European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    the bill will "introduce some of the most stringent infringements on civil liberties in Britain since the second world war."III This form of legislation is displayed as a 'provisional' measure to combat terrorism, although such bills have historically been prolonged infringements on freedom.

  2. Beneficial joint tenants and the protection of purchasers: An unsolved problem

    might be unaware that the land was held upon trust. [FN17] So far as registered titles were concerned, the 1925 draftsman was able to go further in protecting purchasers, because a title registration statute provides the opportunity to state what interests will bind a purchaser following a registered disposition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work