• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS THE 1834 POOR LAW AMENDMENT ACT? The 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act was essentially meant to aid the fight against pauperism and to assist the poor into work and hopefully lead them to be better citizens and no longer a burden to the state. In order to analyse how successful the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act was we have to examine what was in practice before, why it was implemented and what changed after the Act. Before the new Act the system of relief to the Poor that was in practice was the Poor Law Act of 1601, where the state (through the parishes) was responsible for those who were unable to support themselves: the sick, the elderly and the orphans - "the deserving poor" (because it wasn't their fault). They would be taken care in Poorhouses. For the able-bodied - "the undeserving poor" (they could provide for themselves but they didn't want to) or the unemployed, work would be provided, or they would receive cash or food (allowance), in order to help them. (Murray, 1999, p. 16). The money for the relief to the Poor was provided by rates (poor-rates), a local tax based on the value of the property. Till 1834 the Old Poor Law suffered several modifications: the Laws of Settlement (1662), which protect a parish from being overwhelmed by the poor who didn't belong to them (people could only ask for relief in the parish where they were born or ...read more.


145). A Report came out with some important recommendations that were in accordance with the views of Bentham and Malthus (Digby, 1982, p. 12). The main Recommendations were, firstly there should be only one system of poor relief for the whole country; secondly outdoor relief should be abolished; thirdly parishes should join together to form Unions; fourthly relief should only be given if the Poor was prepared to enter the workhouse (the workhouse-test); and fifthly the conditions in the workhouse should be worse than those for the poorest paid labourer living outside the workhouse (the principle of less-eligibility) (Murray, 1999, p. 26). The recommendations from the Report were incorporated in the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act and its main aims were: to abolish the outdoor relief and "? to cut the cost of poor relief; ? to reduce the poor rates; ? to transfer control of poor relief into the hands of the rate-payers; ? to transfer responsibility from individual parishes with unpaid overseers to the Unions with elected Boards of Guardians, and some central control from London" ( Evers, 2003, p. 157). Historians disagree about the significance of the Act. "Some believe that it represented the victory of the newly enfranchised middle classes, whilst an alternative view is that the Act was an attempt to consolidate the traditional power of the rural landowning classes. Either way, there is no doubt that the New Poor Law and the workhouse system that went with it were hated by the poor themselves throughout the nineteenth century and indeed into the twentieth century" (Murray, 1999, p. ...read more.


The persistent effort to reduce outdoor relief in the late 19th century was helped by the growing number of charities organisations, such as Dr. Barnado, Octavia Still, Salvation Army, etc. They targeted their help towards the "deserving poor", leaving the "undeserving poor" to be handled by the Poor Law Authorities. (Murray, 1999, p. 50). This alliance brought the desired result: by 1900 the number of people receiving outdoor relief had reduced significantly. "Although the workhouse population had risen by the turn of the century, the proportion of paupers in the total population had declined from 4.7% in the 1860s to around 2.5% in 1900." (Murray, 1999, p. 50). In conclusion, it can be suggest that the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act wasn't successful because its principles were never fully implemented: the outdoor relief wasn't abolished; the "workhouse- test" wasn't enforced nationwide; the principle of "less-eligibility" didn't work, and, above all, the aim to cut the cost of poor relief (indoor and outdoor) wasn't achieved. The 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act was seen by most of the working class as an instrument by which, the state punished people who were poor, even though it wasn't their fault (Evers, 2003, p. 157). The Act only dealt with the effects of poverty but didn't care enough about the causes of it. Nevertheless, the 1834 Act was seen by historians as "... the most significant development in the history of poverty and welfare in the 19th century and that it set the agenda for the debate on poverty for the next century" (Murray, 1999, p. 27). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. 'The Land Registration Act 2002 makes a poor attempt at reforming the law of ...

    Prior to registration and during the period where the squatter is acquiring the rights, the squatter has an overriding interest under 's70 (1)(f) LRA 1925,' 'Rights acquired or in the course of being acquired under the Limitation Acts'. The position in unregistered land is more straightforward and the squatter subsequently

  2. Insanity, diminished responsibility and automatism.

    P694 24 DPP v Camplin [1978] 2 All ER 168-Camplin was a 15 year old boy. He was sodomised his victim and then taunted about the act. He then killed his victim, but was granted the defence because of his age.

  1. Analyse and evaluate how poor people were treated in British society between 1601 and ...

    During the 1600's provision for the poor was dependant on Christian charity. The Poor Law of 1601 attempted to clarify vague Elizabethan statutes with relation to poor provisions. The Poor Law of 1601 categorised the poor for the first time into three specific groups.

  2. The 1999 Immigration and Asylum Seekers Act

    persecution and not necessarily because of the higher numbers of refuges seeking asylum here in the UK, ( Solomos, 2003:72-73). A number of asylum agency workers have criticized the dispersal scheme for being a no-nonsense method of moving asylum seekers into areas of increased vulnerability to racist attacks and discrimination.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent was the Poor Law Ammendment Act of 1834 a 'New' Poor ...

    Also, workhouses were key to the Old Poor Law, but few parishes actually built them. In 1834 the government responded to the Royal Commission report by drawing up a bill which broadly reflected the recommendations in the report. It was intended to bring about a radical reform of the system of poor relief in England and Wales.

  2. Why Was the Poor Law Reformed in 1834?

    The Act of Settlement in 1662 required people to claim relief solely in the parish of their birth or marriage making it very difficult for people to seek work outside of their parish. Relief was mainly given in the form of 'outdoor relief', but varied from parish to parish.

  1. How successful was the Victorian poor law?

    [Evans, 1978:59] It was not really a success, with political protests and riots being held and all strata of society resenting the Acts. There were reasons however, which led to the New Poor Law turning out to be such a disaster.

  2. To what extent has the children act 1989 ensured that more attention is paid ...

    capable of making up his own on the matter requiring decision"(per Lord Scarman). Whether or not a child is Gilleck- competent depends on their emotional and intellectual maturity. This means that the mature minor is able to make decisions on issues depending whether or not they truly understand the complexity of the issue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work