• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Human Rights Legislation.

Extracts from this document...


Human Rights Legislation. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted on the 10th of December 1948. The declaration was not intended to impose any legal obligation on the state; rather it was proclaimed as, "a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations". Although it is not binding on any state, the declaration strengthens the states obligation under the UN Charter1. The fundamental principle of the UDHR, is that it is universal both in scope and in applicability. These rights are assigned, not because their government has taken up membership in some international peace-loving organisation, but rather these are seen as fundamental rights protecting the individual, simply by the virtue of being a Human. The essence of 'Human Rights' is so they impose an obligation on individuals or on states to give assistance to every other human being to attain these fundamental rights. In context to the question posed, Human Rights provisions are interesting because if it is found that the prisoners held in Guantanamo Bay are not entitled to Prisoner of War (POW) status, (therefore not protected under the Third Geneva Convention), then their detention and treatment will have to be in line with International Human Rights provisions. ...read more.


Article 9.3: Anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge, or other office authorised by law to exercise judicial power, and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time. Article 9.4: Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to proceedings in court, in order that court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention, and order his release if the detention is not lawful. The essence of Article 9 authorises the state to grant POW status, and only a competent tribunal may adjudicate any doubtful questions about their status, such an important decision about their legal status and judicial safeguards should be determined by an impartial and independent court. The decision about their future should not be left to one person. International Humanitarian Law The League of the Red Cross Societies was founded in the 1919. Its first matters of concern were the conditions of the sick and wounded in the field of war and the treatment, and exchange of POWs. Nowadays, the valuable work of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) does not only benefit the members of the armed forces, but has also been extended to concern whole sectors of the population where people have been threatened by the methods of warfare4. ...read more.


This means that National Liberation Movements can now be perceived as having, properly constituted authority7. It seems that the underlying principle of the Geneva Conventions is that decent and humane treatment is an immediate right given to members of the armed forces, captured by the enemy in an armed conflict8. What is debatable concerning the detainees held a Guantanamo Bay is not whether they are entitled to protection under International Law, but what Regulations the detaining power has set aside to determine their arrest and detention lawful. The focal point of discussion is the nature of the conflict; the status of the prisoners and what remedies (safeguards) are available to them. 1 Robertson A H & Merrills R eds. Human Rights in the World; Introduction to the Study of International law (1996) Manchester: Manchester University Press p.28-29. 2 Ibid p.202-203 3 Ibid p.204. 4 International Committee of the Red Cross- History of Organization www.nobel.se/peace/laureates/1944/red-cross-history.html 5 Rodley N S. The Treatment of Prisoners Under International Law 2ed. (1999) Oxford: Clarendon Press 6 Rosas A. The Legal Status of Prisoners of War; A Study in International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflict (1976) Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia 7 Hare J E & Joynt C B. Ethics and International Affairs (1982) London: MacMillan Press 8 Dapper G. The Red Cross Conventions (1979) London: Stevens & Sons Ltd ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Law essays

  1. Montevideo convention and criteria of statehood

    the fact that the concept of recognition in international law is notoriously murky, prevalent view of recognition among international law scholars, officials and courts today is of the declaratory theory.32 Self-determination as additional factor relevant to the criteria for statehood Fawcett, the declaratist, suggested that the requirement of self-determination is

  2. Between the various sources of International Law there exists an obvious hierarchy, in which ...

    if general principles could provide rules to override those derived from sources superior to them. This is also supported by the positivist doctrine56 that treats conventional and customary law as equal expressions of the will of states, upon which international law is based.

  1. International law does not offer any effective remedy where the government of a State ...

    However these Human Rights Courts did not provide a solution to all human rights abuses. Such courts are not empowered to address abuse that occur as a consequence of military action. There is a danger that the system of individual protection will be overwhelmed by the number of incoming complaints by persons on the basis of an armed conflict.

  2. Public International Law

    Second, a new wave of conservatism swept America. With the election of Ronald Reagan as President in 1980, the notion that the domestic role of the Federal Government should be curtailed even if it means reduction of social spending gained considerable public support.

  1. Is there a future for the principle of self-determination in international law in the ...

    would have the right to pursue equally their economic, social and cultural development.16 Furthermore this wider meaning of self determination was reaffirmed in the 1970 UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV)17 and the 1975 Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe which recognised that self-determination is applicable beyond the colonial context.


    Therefore, it is vital that both government policy and international principles are clarified to create greater certainty. The Caroline Case15 in 1837 established principles regarding the circumstances in which the use of force may be justified by the self defence principle.

  1. International Law in International Politics

    show deference to international law even when to do so appears to be contrary to their power interests. For instance, in December 2002, the United States has allowed a North Korea ship carrying 15 Scud missiles and warheads to Yemen to proceed on its way after the vessel and its

  2. Intervention in Libya demonstrates that the use of force on grounds of humanitarian intervention ...

    The Libyan case does not satisfy any of these criteria. Nonetheless, the UNSC granted the right to the NATO and its allies to intervene in Libya by using âall necessary measures.â Ten out of fifteen members of the UNSC voted in favour of the Resolution 1973/2011 co-sponsored by the United States, France, Great-Britain and Lebanon.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work