• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In this essay I will define the constitution, its main elements and its aim. Moreover I will explain the structure of the British constitution and its sources which are divided as legal rules and non legal rules. Then I will explain the constitutional con

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In this essay I will define the constitution, its main elements and its aim. Moreover I will explain the structure of the British constitution and its sources which are divided as legal rules and non legal rules. Then I will explain the constitutional conventions, their functions and their effects on the British constitutional arrangements. Finally I will conclude on whether "the use of constitutional conventions has enabled the UK to have workable constitutional arrangements despite having thoroughly outdated formal legal rule" or not. A constitution is set of rules and principles in order to function and ensure order in society. A constitution can be described in a narrow and a wider sense. Bradley & Ewing described constitution in a narrow sense as 'a document having a special legal sanctity which sets out the framework and the principal functions of the organs of government within the state and declares the principles by which those organs must operate'.1 Bradley and Ewing also described constitution in wider sense as ' it is used to describe the whole system of government of a country, the collection of rules which ...read more.

Middle

They are defined by AV Dicey as 'understandings. Habits or practices which, though they may regulate the conduct of the several members of the sovereign power, of the Ministry, or of other officials, are not in reality laws at all since they are not enforced by the courts'.3 The purpose of the constitutional conventions is to ensure that constitution is developing on the basis of needs. Some significant characteristics of political system in Britain are regulated by some of the conventions such as the role of the Monarch, the position of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Barnett stated that ' a constitutional convention is a non legal rule which imposes an obligation on those bound by the conventions, breach or violation of which will give rise to legitimate criticism , and that criticism will generally take the form of an accusation of "unconstitutional conduct"'.4 Lord Jenning suggested an effective test to determine the existence of a constitutional convention. This test is thee-part test which three questions must be asked. ...read more.

Conclusion

The main aim of constitutional conventions is to ensure the constitutional legal workings confirm the needs of the time. The unwritten conventions are preferable as they are more flexible and can be evolved easily. The adoption of constitution to that period is based on constitutional conventions. Both constitutional law and conventions create the United Kingdom's constitution and without conventions there would be a gap in constitution which would make it unworkable. Conventions have a lot of influence on the UK constitution and as they affect all branches of the government it is not possible to think that without conventions the government functioning will work correctly. They also regulate some of the most significant characteristics of political system in Britain and without conventions there will be a lot of problems related to political issues. To sum up, I agree with the statement that 'the use of constitutional conventions has enabled the UK to have workable constitutional arrangements despite having thoroughly outdated formal legal rule'. With the impacts on judiciary and political issues, conventions tempted to keep constitutional arrangements up to date and in my opinion if constitutional conventions would not followed it can create political problems. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Public Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Public Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    This paper will deal with the common law legal system as a legal transplant, ...

    4 star(s)

    Social situations prevented judges from rendering judicial decisions consistent with English common law as prevalent Chinese, Muslim and Hindu customary laws had to be respected and preserved. Transplanting the common law system into Burma was exteremely onerous because of its pre-existing unified social and legal structure.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Constitution of United Kingdom In Comparison with the Constitution of Russia

    4 star(s)

    It includes such outlines as the Fundamentals of the Constitutional System, Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen, Judicial Power and many more . In 1988 the USSR Constitution was substantially re-written to create a new parliament, the Congress of People's Deputies, as well as a full time legislature in the form of a revamped USSR Supreme Soviet.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the relevance of the concept of the rule of law to current constitutional ...

    4 star(s)

    His particular focus with this was government officials. This feature can be one of the most problematic ones as people can find it hard to accept that we are all equal before the law. It means the constitution is the result of the ordinary law of the land...

  2. Marked by a teacher

    UK constitution

    3 star(s)

    the government can act in any way they wish and are even capable of increasing their own power. This is in contrast to most other nations. For example in United States they are legally limited by their formal codified constitution which means they cannot pass any law that they choose.

  1. To what extent are conventions a recognised source of the British Constitution?

    In general, if the Law Lords were to get involved with politically matters especially when the "House performs its legislative deliberative functions"19 then the matters would become greater. If the British Constitution did not have conventions than it would not be constitution at all as it needs convention to make it work."

  2. Public Law Essay

    months of the complained matter coming into notice. In judicial review, standing is based on a sufficient interest test16 whereas a person aggrieved or their personal representative can bring a complaint to the Ombudsman.17 Judicial review remedies are discretionary. Quashing orders, mandatory orders, declarations or injunctions may be given and

  1. Free essay

    The unwritten nature of the British Constitution is not simply an accidental failure to ...

    range of political affairs.10 Indeed such a situation arose in the USA in Bush v Gore11, in a dispute over who was the legitimate President. Instead of looking for a political solution, the Supreme Court was asked to try and deduce from the Constitution who the victor was.

  2. Constitutional Conventions of the UK

    The courts did give recognition to conventions, although they are rarely called upon to do so. This can be illustrating by the following two cases are illustrative. The first is that of Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd[9]. In 1976, the executors of the late Richard Crossman, a former Cabinet

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work