• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what circumstances may the veil of incorporation be lifted at common law?

Extracts from this document...


Company Law In what circumstances may the veil of incorporation be lifted at common law? Discuss The 1897 case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 firmly established the principle that a company has a separate legal identity to that of its members. These separate legal identities are protected by the veil of incorporation, which can only be disregarded by the courts in particular circumstances. The established situation where the court will lift the veil of incorporation is where a company has been formed to avoid legal obligations. For example, in Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442, land was sold to a newly formed company to avoid an order for specific performance that would otherwise have been made against an individual. ...read more.


In Smith Stone and Knight Birmingham Corporation [1939] 4 All ER 116, the court considered various factors relevant in determining whether a subsidiary was in fact acting as an agent of the parent. The issues to consider were whether profits were treated as profits of the parent, whether the parent governed the business of the subsidiary and whether the parent was in effectual and constant control. In the past, the corporate veil has been lifted where a group of companies have been viewed as a single economic entity. This argument was raised successfully in the case of D. H. N Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [1976] 1 WLR 852. In this case, the Court of Appeal were prepared to treat the companies in a group as one economic entity; thereby, allowing the ...read more.


In the 1990 case of Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] Ch 433, the single economic entity and agency arguments were raised in an attempt to establish that an English company had a presence in the United States. The Court of Appeal made clear that there was no general principle that companies in a group would be regarded as one. Only if the wording of the statute demanded this approach, would it be followed. As far as an agency was concerned, the court took the view that there was no presumption of agency in parent/subsidiary relationship, although an agency relationship could be established on the facts. The court also described the fraud or fa´┐Żade scenario as one well recognised exception to the rule prohibiting the piercing of the corporate veil. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. History of Common Law and Equity.

    Conversely, the parliament thought that the king should only be able to do this through the workings of the parliament. James dissolved parliament and tried to run the country himself. He also changed the law at will. He came head to head with the legal profession - especially the Lord Chief Justice of Common-law - Lord Justice Coke (pronounced Cook).

  2. Interim Injunction.

    that in most cases the tribunal will be the appropriate first 'port of call' for a party seeking an order with matters under s2GC(1). In the majority of cases, however, the court will be unlikely to exercise its discretion in favour of making an order in lieu of the tribunal

  1. Company Law 5. ...

    In addition to this, there are several situations where the courts are prepared to lift the veil of incorporation. Either to diminish the corporate personality to account for individual members, or to ignore the separate personality of several companies in a group, in favour of the economic entity constituted by the group as a whole.

  2. "It is becoming increasingly difficult to predict whether in any particular case the courts ...

    I will now give examples of company law cases and the circumstances under which the veil of incorporation can be lifted by the courts. In national emergency cases, in times of war or other emergency where economic sanctions may be imposed, the courts may have to lift the corporate veil to reveal the nationality of a company.

  1. Lifting the corporate veil..Following the decision of the court of appeal in Adams v ...

    it in to a company was so that he could carry on as before but with limited liability. The House of Lords overturned the decision of both the liquidator and the court of appeal, rejecting the argument on grounds of agency and fraud.

  2. Company Law Adams v Cape

    Often the subsidiary has limited assets and offers little scope for recovery6. Even if the subsidiary is still available and has assets, or the parent corporation can be made directly accountable before local courts for its operations, there is strong motivation to proceed against the parent company in its own jurisdiction.

  1. Modernising Company Law

    Directors are required to act "bona fide in what they consider - not what a court may consider - is in the interests of the company..."2 It is hardly surprising that it is difficult to show breach of duty by the directors.

  2. In what circumstances may a person who finds an object on, or under the ...

    Indeed, whether an item will be considered a fixture or a chattel first depends on how firmly the object is attached to the land. If the object isn't attached to the land other than by its own weight (unless it is firmly attached to it), the court is not likely to consider it a fixture, but rather a chattel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work