• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Individual Rights Versus Public Order.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Individual Rights Versus Public Order Rough Draft Norma Enriquez CJA 320 Joseph Cain October 16, 2003 Individual Rights Versus Public Order The American justice system faces difficult obstacles daily. A crime occurs and a series of actions proceed. Law enforcement responds the court hears the case and our correctional facilities face overcrowding with our overwhelming need to punish and incarcerate. Every aspect of this system has come under scrutiny with members of society falling under one of two categories: individual rights or public order advocates. One seeks justice with regards to human rights, the other, will sacrifice those rights in return for the safety of its citizens and threats to its homeland. The nature of the individual rights advocate is to hold true what is written in the Constitution, specifically the first ten amendments. "These rights are especially important to criminal defendants facing formal processing by the criminal justice system" (Schmalleger 9). Those accused of committing a crime have rights granted upon arrest beginning with their Miranda rights. Consequently, many people believe that if there is a threat to public safety, certain rights should give way in many instances. ...read more.

Middle

The expanded police powers created under the legislation are not limited to investigations of terrorist activity, but apply to many different criminal offenses" (Schmalleger 8). The act allows law enforcement to not only profile those of Middle Eastern descent, but any other race they feel is a threat. This is an example of what it means to be for public order rather than individual rights because under this Act, a person can be arrested and held without their civil rights being respected. . Instead, they can be questioned and held for any particular amount of time as long as law enforcement deems it necessary. As an individual rights advocate, I believe this will lead to profiling and other modes of singling citizens out solely on suspicion. There are strengths and weaknesses on both sides of these two classifications. How much power do we want to give law enforcement when it comes to arresting and detaining people and when do we decide that too much is too much? There will continue to be the threat that the United States could see another terrorist attack, since September 11, we as Americans feel very unsafe and uneasy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Individual rights or public order advocate, who really cares, we all want the same thing. The American dream lives on in people and they strive daily to reach it. People stand firm behind what our founding fathers preached, whether they intended to include all people at that time is still a question but we still stand behind the notion that we live in a country we love and we will fight for that country by any means necessary. If there is a threat to Americans, we better fight back and fight back hard! If there is an injustice we need to conquer it, if there is anything broken anywhere, we better be the ones who fix it for we are the United States, the most powerful country in the world. The debate between our civil, human and individual rights and our protection as a society and a country should go hand in hand by empowering the citizens of our country, by building a country that others can model, a country that is diverse yet strong. We need to shift our attention towards ourselves and not hide behind fear masked with a constant need for war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Individual Rights ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    No right can be used at the expense or destruction of another, in accordance with international law69. As such, claiming cultural relativism as an excuse to violate or deny human rights is an abuse of the right to culture70. Cultural rights do not justify torture, murder, genocide, and discrimination on

  2. Critically assess and compare the role and significance of two of the following in ...

    not have been as important as some believe not only in getting the 1964 Civil Rights Act passed but in the whole civil rights movement. For example, Findlay speaks of the immense importance of the labour groups during the struggle, quoting Clarence Mitchell, an NAACP lobbyist in Washington who said,

  1. Human Rights

    For that reason, the application of treaties in the different countries stayed a matter of self-determination and self-policing, leading, of course, to consequent opportunities of Human Rights breaches, and impeaching nearly all attempts in enforcing Human Rights. III- Self-policing in enforcing Human Rights Law "Washington can unilaterally proclaim a Pax

  2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of New Labour's approach to youth crime?

    Grouped with other reports such the Audit Commission's Misspent Youth and Narey's Home Office Report on youth, such an Act was to be expected (Fionda, 1999). The Act gained its Royal Assent on the 31st of July 1998 and was described as: "the biggest shake-up for 50 years in tackling crime" (Guardian, 1997).

  1. Critically assess the notion; 'Privatising Prisons is 'Morally Wrong''

    Dilution of Parliamentary Power/Sovereignty and Privatisation Under the theory of general deterrence it is the threat of punishment that deters people from committing crimes. At the legislative level, Parliament establishes penalties to threaten those who might contemplate committing a crime.

  2. Libertarian Welfare Rights. An Inquiry into the Coherence of Some Common Libertarian Commitments

    protect basic civil, political, and property rights even by free consent (so consensualism is false). Libertarians must either embrace consensualism or minimalism. One might initially think that libertarians would want to deny consensualism rather than minimalism.

  1. Non Violence and Black Power: How differing conceptions of power led to the transition ...

    Economic accumulation was regarded as of greater import than political agitation and Washington emphasised the importance of vocational training and 'useful' work rather than higher education and the achievement of professional status, to lay the "material foundations" (B.& M.1965,p.13) for succeeding generations.

  2. Should the Government be allowed to exercise its powers in controlling and invading our ...

    it is included in the United Nations Covenant on such rights however could be argued that in certain respects, it also involves questions of economic, cultural and social rights.1 Professor Alan Westin quoted in his landmark book, Privacy and Freedom that 'privacy is at the heart of freedom in the modern state'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work