• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Individual Rights Versus Public Order.

Extracts from this document...


Individual Rights Versus Public Order Rough Draft Norma Enriquez CJA 320 Joseph Cain October 16, 2003 Individual Rights Versus Public Order The American justice system faces difficult obstacles daily. A crime occurs and a series of actions proceed. Law enforcement responds the court hears the case and our correctional facilities face overcrowding with our overwhelming need to punish and incarcerate. Every aspect of this system has come under scrutiny with members of society falling under one of two categories: individual rights or public order advocates. One seeks justice with regards to human rights, the other, will sacrifice those rights in return for the safety of its citizens and threats to its homeland. The nature of the individual rights advocate is to hold true what is written in the Constitution, specifically the first ten amendments. "These rights are especially important to criminal defendants facing formal processing by the criminal justice system" (Schmalleger 9). Those accused of committing a crime have rights granted upon arrest beginning with their Miranda rights. Consequently, many people believe that if there is a threat to public safety, certain rights should give way in many instances. ...read more.


The expanded police powers created under the legislation are not limited to investigations of terrorist activity, but apply to many different criminal offenses" (Schmalleger 8). The act allows law enforcement to not only profile those of Middle Eastern descent, but any other race they feel is a threat. This is an example of what it means to be for public order rather than individual rights because under this Act, a person can be arrested and held without their civil rights being respected. . Instead, they can be questioned and held for any particular amount of time as long as law enforcement deems it necessary. As an individual rights advocate, I believe this will lead to profiling and other modes of singling citizens out solely on suspicion. There are strengths and weaknesses on both sides of these two classifications. How much power do we want to give law enforcement when it comes to arresting and detaining people and when do we decide that too much is too much? There will continue to be the threat that the United States could see another terrorist attack, since September 11, we as Americans feel very unsafe and uneasy. ...read more.


Individual rights or public order advocate, who really cares, we all want the same thing. The American dream lives on in people and they strive daily to reach it. People stand firm behind what our founding fathers preached, whether they intended to include all people at that time is still a question but we still stand behind the notion that we live in a country we love and we will fight for that country by any means necessary. If there is a threat to Americans, we better fight back and fight back hard! If there is an injustice we need to conquer it, if there is anything broken anywhere, we better be the ones who fix it for we are the United States, the most powerful country in the world. The debate between our civil, human and individual rights and our protection as a society and a country should go hand in hand by empowering the citizens of our country, by building a country that others can model, a country that is diverse yet strong. We need to shift our attention towards ourselves and not hide behind fear masked with a constant need for war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Individual Rights ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Human Rights

    For that reason, the application of treaties in the different countries stayed a matter of self-determination and self-policing, leading, of course, to consequent opportunities of Human Rights breaches, and impeaching nearly all attempts in enforcing Human Rights. III- Self-policing in enforcing Human Rights Law "Washington can unilaterally proclaim a Pax

  2. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    It protects the right to security of person and the right not to be subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment120. The traditional interpretation of these rights has generally failed to encompass forms of violence against women such as domestic violence or FGM121.

  1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of New Labour's approach to youth crime?

    Now these approaches of the governments before that of New Labour can be looked at as a comparison and as an idea of what the Labour government had to pick up from. The presumption of doli incapax (incapable of evil)

  2. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    joint authors and first owners of the economic rights, and similar provisions as referred to above apply where the director is employed (see section 15(2) of the Act. * In the case of a sound recording the author and first owner of copyright is the record producer; in the case

  1. Human rights, racism, hate crimes and the case of the holocast denial.

    was to provide an educative function by portraying a message that racist bigotry and acts of violence, harassment and damage motivated by such bigotry are socially unacceptable in a multi cultural Britain. However, in doing so, it is necessary to also take into consideration the social networks and communities that sanction the actions of potential perpretators.


    those rights could only cause inequality of individuals, because those individuals 'can be advanced at the expense of others'. (Craig, 1998:130) Marx thought that those rights created by 'bourgeois' for 'bourgeois' had just one function, as it was to hide 'bourgeois' 'cruelty, unscrupulousness and dishonesty'.

  1. Critically assess the notion; 'Privatising Prisons is 'Morally Wrong''

    Dilution of Parliamentary Power/Sovereignty and Privatisation Under the theory of general deterrence it is the threat of punishment that deters people from committing crimes. At the legislative level, Parliament establishes penalties to threaten those who might contemplate committing a crime.

  2. African American civil rights have come along way since the days of slavery.

    119) The Civil Rights Act of 1957 made it a federal crime to attempt to prevent a person from voting. Civil Rights Act of 1960 denied the right to vote by practices of discrimination. Civil Rights Act of 1964 barred discrimination on basis of race, color, religion, or nationality

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work