• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Intention to create legal relations

Extracts from this document...


~ ~ âA mere statement of intention made in the course of conversation will not constitute a binding promise, though acted upon by the party to whom it was madeâ¦â¦â¦â According to this questionit asks whether the mere fact that a statement of intention to createa contract which is formed when an offer by one party is accepted by the other party, how the parties becomes legally bounded to act accordingly to the actions of the agreement? A contract does not exist simply because there is an agreement between people. The parties to the agreement must intend to enter into a legally binding agreement. To discuss this first we have to think about the legal capacity of a contract. So then we have to see whatâs the difference between a legally binding promise or an agreement and a mere promise which has no legal consequences. For this purpose theremust be a clear view to see what are requirements of an agreement to be a legally binding contract. First the parties must intend the agreement to be legally binding. ...read more.


Balfour. She did not rebut the presumption.ââ. This statement clearly shows that the rebuttable presumption on social and domestic agreements is that parties do not intend to be legally bound when they enter in to agreements. But as it is meant to be the presumption can be rebutted. Merritt v Merritt (1970) is a best example for such a rebutted presumption. In this case the husband left the matrimonial house to live with another women and he agreed to his wife in writing to pay her £40 per month maintenance from which she had to repay the mortgage and, when the repayment was completed, to transfer the house into a sole ownership. The wife did in fact pay off the mortgage but the husband changed his mind. She sued and succeeded because the court of appeal decided that there was clear intent. Crucially, they were legally separated.So itâs clear in Balfour, on the other hand Merritt case illustrates that the courts want to avoid unwanted litigations rushing in the courts by these social and domestic agreements and the parties had entered a binding contract as the setting of the agreement was commercial and no domestic or social. ...read more.


And it statedthat it was a basic condition of the relationship between the parties that any transaction entered into in respect of the pool should not be attended by or gives rise to any legal relationship. And it was held that the words âBinding in honour onlyâ were contained on each coupon and these words were sufficient to rebut the presumption. On these examples clearly shows when the agreements arrive in a commercial context the courts presume that the parties of the agreement do intent to create legally binding relations and that presumption can be rebutted. According to the above facts itâs clear that an agreement of the parties is becomes with the all three combination of intention, offer and acceptance crucial element to make a legally binding agreement. So, only just saying that a party to create an agreement with intention to create legal relation does not make any sense to the other party if the agreement even carried out and then breached, but there must be clear evidence to justify that whether or not the parties really intended them to be so exposed or to find really what is in the parties mind. Reference, 1. P. Richards: The law of contract 09thEd. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. The mere prescence of consideration normally implies the existence of an intention to ...

    On the other hand, we expect agreements with companies to be enforced. It is understood that we need to demonstrate the following contractual elements: An agreement with an offer and an acceptance, Consideration and Intention Criticism of Intention Oddly, this third factor is capable of being criticised because it can be seen as unnecessary given that there is consideration.

  2. This paper discusses the start-up, organisation and conduct of the company "Anders & Birgitte" ...

    The link of causality between the acts/omissions of A and the injury are therefore obvious. The fact that A spills his coffee leads to the event that IP falls in the coffee causing injury. There is also a high degree of proximity because there are only very few phases between

  1. Critically discuss the presumptions relating to the intention to create legal relations.

    After the wife had repaid the mortgage the husband refused to transfer the house. The court of appeal held that there was an intention to create legal relations therefore the agreement was enforceable as a contract. This was mainly due to the fact that negotiation was made as a response to when there was a marital breakdown.

  2. How does the Doctrine of Intention to create legal relations fit into the Traditional ...

    This creates the idea of a bargain, offer acceptance and good consideration. Thus, this line of reasoning requires, when determining whether legal intention is existent it is redundant to look for anything else other than these three components of the bargain.


    he had orally promised to pay her 30 Pounds a month until she could rejoin him - agreement held not binding as there was a lack of intention in the parties "that they should be attended by legal consequences"- Balfour v Balfour - reinforced in Australia in Cohen v Cohen (dress allowance case)

  2. Advise Anna of her legal position

    the parties intend to be legally bound and b) they reach a sufficient agreement without any further requirements. Again this departs Anna from any legal liability as she didn't intend to be legally bound, and had not reached any agreement with Ben.

  1. A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. An agreement ...

    An offer must be communicated to the other party. This is simply because the offeree cannot accept something they are unaware of. This is shown in the case of Taylor v Laird (1856) 1 H & N 266; 25 LJ Ex 3292. The claimant was employed to command a steamer up the river Niger, at a rate of £50 per month.

  2. "Intention to create legal relations could be used to replace the doctrine of consideration. ...

    Instead it focuses on offer, acceptance and consideration.11 If these are present, and unless rebutted by contrary evidence, courts operate on the basis of two legal presumptions, that there is no intention to be bound in domestic or social arrangements, but there is intention to be bound in commercial agreements.12

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work