• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Intention to create legal relations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

~ ~ ?A mere statement of intention made in the course of conversation will not constitute a binding promise, though acted upon by the party to whom it was made???? According to this questionit asks whether the mere fact that a statement of intention to createa contract which is formed when an offer by one party is accepted by the other party, how the parties becomes legally bounded to act accordingly to the actions of the agreement? A contract does not exist simply because there is an agreement between people. The parties to the agreement must intend to enter into a legally binding agreement. To discuss this first we have to think about the legal capacity of a contract. So then we have to see what?s the difference between a legally binding promise or an agreement and a mere promise which has no legal consequences. For this purpose theremust be a clear view to see what are requirements of an agreement to be a legally binding contract. First the parties must intend the agreement to be legally binding. ...read more.

Middle

Balfour. She did not rebut the presumption.“”. This statement clearly shows that the rebuttable presumption on social and domestic agreements is that parties do not intend to be legally bound when they enter in to agreements. But as it is meant to be the presumption can be rebutted. Merritt v Merritt (1970) is a best example for such a rebutted presumption. In this case the husband left the matrimonial house to live with another women and he agreed to his wife in writing to pay her £40 per month maintenance from which she had to repay the mortgage and, when the repayment was completed, to transfer the house into a sole ownership. The wife did in fact pay off the mortgage but the husband changed his mind. She sued and succeeded because the court of appeal decided that there was clear intent. Crucially, they were legally separated.So it’s clear in Balfour, on the other hand Merritt case illustrates that the courts want to avoid unwanted litigations rushing in the courts by these social and domestic agreements and the parties had entered a binding contract as the setting of the agreement was commercial and no domestic or social. ...read more.

Conclusion

And it statedthat it was a basic condition of the relationship between the parties that any transaction entered into in respect of the pool should not be attended by or gives rise to any legal relationship. And it was held that the words ?Binding in honour only? were contained on each coupon and these words were sufficient to rebut the presumption. On these examples clearly shows when the agreements arrive in a commercial context the courts presume that the parties of the agreement do intent to create legally binding relations and that presumption can be rebutted. According to the above facts it?s clear that an agreement of the parties is becomes with the all three combination of intention, offer and acceptance crucial element to make a legally binding agreement. So, only just saying that a party to create an agreement with intention to create legal relation does not make any sense to the other party if the agreement even carried out and then breached, but there must be clear evidence to justify that whether or not the parties really intended them to be so exposed or to find really what is in the parties mind. Reference, 1. P. Richards: The law of contract 09thEd. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Doctrine of Intention to Create Legal Relations

    A social or domestic agreement is usually not legally binding as it only consists of an offer and acceptance, whilst in a business agreement there is also an intention to create legal relations. 8 Thus it seems apparent that if the intentions of both parties in a legally binding contract,

  2. Critically discuss the presumptions relating to the intention to create legal relations.

    However, it is vital that one does not rely too much into the principle applied in the Balfour case. This is illustrated in the case of Jones v Padavatton [1969]4. This involved an agreement between a mother and a daughter.

  1. A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. An agreement ...

    The singer only appeared 3 days in advance to the start of the season. When he arrived his role had been replaced. The producers claimed that the obligation to attend rehearsal was a failed condition, thus allowing them to repudiate and terminate his contract.

  2. To make a contract legally binding, there must be an explicit offer and acceptance, ...

    "In a unilateral contract the offeror promises payment or reward in exchange for the offeree performing a particular act or acts"2. The above rule regarding invitations to treat does not apply to unilateral contracts. Captain Puffin makes the first offer in the form of his posted letter to Lucia.

  1. The mere prescence of consideration normally implies the existence of an intention to ...

    This test of bargain renders superfluous any additional proof of intention. Accordingly, Hepple regards the court as falling into error in trying to identify an additional element of intention in the cases such as Ford Motor Co Ltd v. AEF 1915. The intention requirement requires the manifestation of objective intention.

  2. Determine the legal position of Mr Sagar and Mr Grove.

    The misrepresentation must be material, in the sense that it would have induced a reasonable person to enter into the contract. However, the rule is not strictly objective: In Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties [1990], the judge referred, with approval, to the view of Goff and Jones: Law of Restitution

  1. This paper discusses the start-up, organisation and conduct of the company "Anders & Birgitte" ...

    An unfortunate scenario for A&B would for example be that they spend time and money on marketing and branding the T-shirts with the DF's design, thus making them extremely popular. Inevitably, DF would reap the benefits by commencing to sell similar T-shirts with the same design that has now become an 'exclusive product' for costumers.

  2. All contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contracts. Discuss.

    the parties to the contract, there are many agreements that do not entail any legal obligations. As such, these agreements cannot be called contracts. For Example: A gives his car to B for repair and B asks for Rs. 200 for the repair works.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work