• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Jurisprudence theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In Tamanaha's chapter "The Contemporary Relevance of Legal Positivism"1, the author addresses the relevance of current legal positivism by considering the changes and criticisms that it has undergone. He intends to reinforce the importance of positivism by reconsidering the relationship between law and morality. He goes a step further to highlight that perhaps, "natural lawyers ought to become allies of legal positivists in scrutinizing all natural law or natural law-sounding claims made by legal systems". Despite the obvious that Tamanaha classifies as being part of the legal positivist approach, his present view of the legal positivist theory, sharply raises doubt as to what extent he can be said and is willing to be considered as one. He acknowledges, "something is amiss with the theory", that it is suffering from a malaise. As to the origin of this, he recognises the separation thesis, Hart's unchanged concept and the inner division within the positivists as growing awareness outlines, that law is closely linked to morality. How then, can Tamanaha consider himself a legal positivist if he is questioning and ultimately doubting the ultimate theory of legal positivism? In an attempt to bring back to life legal positivism, he diverts from the negative image, described as "almost entirely pointless"2, to illustrate its contemporary benefits. His endeavour to achieve this aspiration has a knock on effect as natural law is ultimately pointed to as the most acceptable theory. ...read more.

Middle

Rather than criticising the Shari'a itself, Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Motazei holds the judicial system liable for misusing the law. Along these lines, Tamanaha had argued the possibility that judges during the nazi regime had diverted from statutory law. What we can subsequently deduct is the author's attempt to manipulate citizens by diverting the failure as a result of positivism to the judicial system. Consistent with naturalism, Islamic countries have adopted, as a result of modernization, similarly to positivism, the idea that law and morality are closely linked. They have as a result, borrowed substantial bodies of laws and legal institutions from Western legal systems. Tamanaha knowledge's the fact that Islamic law possesses a characteristic that renders it uniquely problematic for legal positivism, namely that Islamic law is inherently moral. "There is no space here for separating law and morality". This is coherent with natural law and therefore sounds a lot like natural law as the author correctly points out. This nevertheless only applies where morality plays a substantial part, not in a system that considers stoning to be morally respectable. Arguing that the Shari'a and natural law are strikingly similar because both have religious origins, illustrates the author's failure to draw a reliable comparison. The author is conscious of the paradoxical assertion that "even when law and morality are explicitly fused, the thesis of the separation between law and morality still applies". Tamanaha is nonetheless incapable to recognise the ineffectiveness the theory of positivism amounts to. ...read more.

Conclusion

Inclusive legal positivism is worse: it is not positivism at all. As a last cry for help, Tamanaha relies on John Dewey's essay, who observed that: philosophy recovers itself when it ceases to be a device for dealing with the problems of philosophers and becomes a method, cultivated by philosophers, for dealing with the problems of men13. 1 Brian Z Tamaha, "The Contemporary Relevance of Legal Positivism" 2 William Twining, "Imagining Bentham: A Celebration' in M D A Freeman (ed), Current Legal Problems 1998: Legal Theory of the End of the Millenium (1998) 1, 2l. 3 John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (W E Rumble ed. First published 1832, 1994 ed) 157. 4 St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica (R J Henle trans, 1993 ed) 95.2. 5 Gustav Radbruch, "Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law" (1946) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1 (2006), pp1-11 6 H L A Hart, "Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals" (1958) Harvard Law Review 593, 617-21 7 Norman Kretzmann, "Lex Non Iniusta Non Est Lex" (1998) American Journal of Jurisprudence 99, 116-121. 8 John L Espusito, Islam: The Straight Path (3rd ed, 1998) 78. 9 Josheph Raz, The Authority of Law, 1979, pp. 39-40. 10 Ronald Dworkin, "The Model of Rules I" and "The Model of Rules II", Taking Rights Seriously (1997) 11 Roscoc Pound, The Ideal Element in Law (2002) 207. 12 Brian Bix, "The Past and Future of Legal Positivism" 13 Jeremy Waldron, "All We Like Sheep" (1999) 12 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence169, 181. Christian Hidalgo 06205165 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. The Central Tension In `Volpone' Involves A Conflict Between Moral And Immoral Behaviour (Peck ...

    However `Did e'er man haste so for his horns?' (Volpone, Act III Sc 7 Ln 4 Norton 7th Edition) In his greed Corvino attempts to force his own wife to have intercourse with Volpone in order that he will then become his heir. This goes beyond simple immorality. It shows the mental state of the main characters and their ideology that everything (including those they are supposed to love)

  2. In this essay I will explain the methods or rules of statutory interpretation and ...

    The complainant suffered racial abuse at work, which he claimed amounted to racial discrimination for which the employers were liable under s32 of the Race Relations Act 1976. The CA applied the purposive approach and held that the acts of discrimination were committed "in the course of employment".

  1. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    However, personal accounts of mutilation reveal feelings of anxiety, terror, humiliation and betrayal, all of which would be likely to have long-term negative effects97. (Appendix C, page 39, gives Hanna Koroma's testimony of the psychological and physical effects of FGM).

  2. The myth that judges interpret and do not legislate has been shattered by the ...

    into the Act, in order to alter its original meaning, to include same sex couples in tenancy agreements. Therefore the judges in this case were legislating, as they were changing the original statute's meaning and the intentions of parliament when the Act was passed and are thus abusing their powers and place within the English Legal system.

  1. Can torture ever be justified?

    the utilitarian approach of sacrificing one person for the benefit of the majority was taken - the majority would most likely not have agreed on the usage of torture for admissibility had there been a re-fashioning of society so that it would have been impossible to find out if they were the ones being tortured.

  2. Libertarian Welfare Rights. An Inquiry into the Coherence of Some Common Libertarian Commitments

    For discussion of the degree conception of legitimacy see: John Simmons, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1979). x Robert Landenson, "In Defense of a Hobbesian Conception of Law," Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 2 (1980), 134-59.

  1. How Can Law Be Regarded As Command Sanction Of The Sovereign? Austin's Theory.

    From Hart?s point of view, this understanding of the law was superficial as it only depicted how the law looked on the outside. The key point from Hart?s argument is that legal theorists cannot adequately understand the law until they understand the law as it is understood by those subject to it.

  2. Jurisprudence - Conjoined Twins - Evaluate the contention that the Court of Appeals determination ...

    on the other hand believed that law and morality could not be so easily separated and that the post war courts were compelled to dismiss Nazi laws, believing that calling them laws was a false description.[14] They were merely instruments in a corrupt regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work