• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law of the European Union

Extracts from this document...


Law of the European Union Coursework. Identification of problem - UK in violation of treaty Application of legal rules and legal authority. The European Community is founded upon treaties. The transfer of sovereignty or powers from the member states to the institutions of the community is limited to specific policies and specific procedures to be found in the treaties. In this assignment I will be discussing how community law can be used in times of breaches by member states and what action individuals may take. Supremacy of EC Law. EU law has direct effect within the legal systems of its Member States, and overrides national law in many areas. The legal order of the European community order is based of the twin pillars of supremacy and direct effect. The principle of supremacy is the notion that if there is ever a clash with Community Law and National Law, the community law will always prevail over supremacy law. By creating the community, the member states consented to transfer to it, certain powers of theirs and to restrict their national rights. One of the first cases to come before the European Court of Justice that distinguished the relationship between Community and National law was - Costa v ENEL [1964] E.C.R. ...read more.


If member states were free to stray from their obligations to implement directives then may important directives would remain implemented. As a result of this, the UK cannot use the defence that they thought the national curriculum was sufficient enough to encompass the requirements of the Directive. If this was the case then a lot of directives wouldn't be implemented because member states would think they weren't necessary. The effectiveness of a directive would be weakened if the nationals of a member state that had failed to implement a directive were denied the rights contained in the directive by the national courts. Gunilla can use the directive because if the courts deny her this, it would mean that she was denied individual rights that are contained in the directive. The ECJ stated three conditions that had to be satisfied for there to be a cause of action for non-implementation3. - The Directive had to create rights for individuals - directive 2006/124 did create rights for individuals - Those rights had to be ascertainable from the text of the directive - which would be available from the text of the directive - There had to be a causal link between the non-implementation and the claimant's loss - and there is a link between the non implementation and Gunilla's loss. ...read more.


If the individuals can not obtain compensation when their rights were infringed then according to Art 10, the EC law would come into question and the protection of the EC obligations. When the EC obligations have been breached therefore, individuals should receive adequate compensation. In order to decide the availability of compensation for Gunilla, the courts will have to have an assessment of the gravity of the breach of the UK. Gunilla can use direct effect to impose proceedings on the UK government. She can also claim for damages for losses that occurred under state liability. Community law will back Gunillas claim up using the rights that are entitled to all individuals by the EC law and the Directives. 1 Tullio Ratti v Ministerio Pubblico 1979 ECR 1629 2 [1964] C.M.L.R. 423 3 Francovich v Italy [1991] E.C.R. I-5357 4 In 837 Grad v Finanzamt Truanting 1970 ECR 825 at 5 Foster and others v British Gas plc [1991] 2 W.L.R. 1075 6 Marshall v Southampton Area Health Authority (1986) ECR 723 7 Duke v GEC Reliance 1988 2WLR 359 8 M.H. Marshall v. Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority [1990] 3 C.M.L.R. 425 9 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Council Directive 2004/707 on transporting retired people (fictitious), adopted on 1 November 2000, requires ...

    3 star(s)

    damage to the individual."19 This means that the directive conferred right to the individual who the state fails to implement, the content of these rights are identifiable from the directive and that there is a causal link in the breach.

  2. Company Law and Corporate Governance

    efficiency and competitiveness of business, with special attention to some specific cross-border issues58, in the hope to attain an integrated market by 2005. The Action Plan is based of a broad set of proposals, grouped under six important chapters: corporate governance being the first.

  1. EU - problem question

    In that case the House of Lords was placed in a difficult position of facing an act of Parliament enacted after UK membership to the EU in 1972, which specifically contradicted EU law.

  2. The Principle of Direct Effect

    the objectives of this Treaty.'7 Given that the implementation period has expired it is possible to argue that the UK is in breach of Article 5 and has failed to take appropriate measures to facilitate the achievement of Community objectives.

  1. Eu Directives Problem Case. Difficulties arise in situations such as the one faced by ...

    A Directive was once described as being able to "intrigue, derange, devise, all this is due to its peculiarity".3 Therefore, although Directives are not directly applicable in that they are not automatic and general in application and give rights without further implementation, Directives have been held to give rise to

  2. Direct effect is a community concept developed by the court of justice to apply ...

    "The clarity and precision of the rule breached.......whether the infringement and the damage caused was intentional or voluntary....."

  1. Are EC directives directly applicable in member states?

    right to invoke a directive depending on the status of the party against which he chooses to invoke it. Against horizontal effects is the fact that the obligation in a directive is addressed to the state and not the individual.

  2. The rule against the horizontal direct effect of directives should be abandoned" Discuss.

    EC Treaty requiring publication of directives in the Official Journal and for this reason private persons would be inexcusable not to know their responsibilities under a directive39. All the possible arguments seem to be on the table; some are more convincing than others, but not one of them is entirely decisive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work