• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law of Tort Assignment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law of Tort Assignment (i) Since the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, it seems that some areas of tort law have been affected by the Act to a great extent. One specific element of tort law that has been affected is 'duty of care in negligence.' The tort of negligence may signify 'whereby persons who by carelessness have caused damage to others and may be held liable to pay compensation.' 1 However, it is not always the case when 'careless conduct which causes damage will give rise to an action.' 2 As this essay will focus on the impact of the Human Rights Act on duty of care in negligence, it is necessary to determine 'whether the type of loss suffered by the claimant in the particular way in which it occurred can ever be actionable,' 3 as this may play a great role in the development of the tort of negligence. Before a duty of care is held to exist, the requirement established in Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 1 All ER 568 must be satisfied: (a) 'Foreseeability of the damage; (b) A sufficiently 'proximate' relationship between the parties; and (c) Even where (a) and (b) are satisfied it must be 'just and reasonable' to impose such a duty.' ...read more.

Middle

In this case, 'allegations of negligence were made against the defendants about the treatment of a child after he had been taken into care. The House of lord held that it was not appropriate to strike out the claim as it was not just and reasonable to impose a duty of care without hearing the evidence.' 22 Therefore the effect of Osman is that in future cases, 'it will no longer be permissible simply to have action struck out on policy grounds as this would contravene Article 6 of the European Convention.' 23 However, there is an objection to the Article 6 view in that 'everyone should get their day in court and it will become much harder for public authorities to settle actions and reduce their costs,' 24 although there is a 'refrain of English negligence law that recognition of a duty of care will open the floodgates of litigation.' 25 The case of Z v United Kingdom 'arose out of the House of lords' decision in X v Bedfordhsire CC [1995] 2 AC 633, in that it was not fair, just and reasonable to admit a duty of care.' 26 In Z v UK, the 'European Court of human rights acknowledged that its decision in Osman v UK had proceeded on a misunderstanding of the English tort of negligence and the procedural rules which permit a party to apply to the court to strike out a claim on the basis that it discloses no reasonable cause of action.' ...read more.

Conclusion

2001 p.9 22 Cooke, J, Law of Tort, 5th Edition (Longman Publishing) 2001 p. 43 23 Cooke, J, Law of Tort, 5th Edition (Longman Publishing) 2001 p. 43 24 Cooke, J, Law of Tort, 5th Edition (Longman Publishing) 2001 p. 43 25 Wright, J, Tort Law and Human Rights, (Hart Publishing) 2001 p.44 26 Fairgrieve, D, 'Pushing back the Boundaries of Public Authority liability: Tort Law enters the Classroom,' (2002) Public Law p.300 27 Jones, M, Textbook on Torts, 8th Edition (Oxford University Press: New York) 2002 p.49 28A. C. L. Davies, 'The European Convention and negligence Actions: Osman Reviewed,' (2001) 117 The Law Quarterly Review p. 521 29 Jones, M, Textbook on Torts, 8th Edition (Oxford University Press: New York) 2002 p.49 3028A. C. L. Davies, 'The European Convention and negligence Actions: Osman Reviewed,' (2001) 117 The Law Quarterly Review p. 523 31 A. C. L. Davies, 'The European Convention and negligence Actions: Osman Reviewed,' (2001) 117 The Law Quarterly Review p. 522 32 Kidner, R, Casebook on Torts, 7th Edition (Oxford University Press) 2002 p.70 33Gearty, C. A, 'Unravelling Osman' (2001) 64 The Modern Law Review p. 186 34 Jones, M, Textbook on Torts, 8th Edition (Oxford University Press: New York) 2002 p.43 35 Fairgrieve, D, 'Pushing back the Boundaries of Public Authority liability: Tort Law enters the Classroom,' (2002) Public Law p.301 36 Wright, J, Tort Law and Human Rights, (Hart Publishing) 2001 p.34 1 020973391 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Tort Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a very good essay. The level of detail is extraordinary.

5 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 23/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Tort Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'The existence of a duty of care is ultimately a question of policy'. Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    The argument was that had they done so, they would have prevented the daughter's death. The House of Lords held that in the circumstances, the police did not owe a duty of care and on that basis the case was not actionable and therefore struck out.

  2. A Critical Examination of the Concept of Breach of Duty of Care

    Negligence is a 'legal cause' of damage if it directly and in natural and continuous sequence produces or contributes substantially to producing such damage, so it can reasonably be said that if not for the negligence, the loss, injury or damage would not have occurred.

  1. Tort Law - Negligence

    (Elliot, 2003) Wagon Mound No1 test states that the defendant is liable for damages that are reasonably foreseeable at the moment of the breach of duty. These cases are concerned with legal liabilities, thus analysed under the Law of Tort and as specifically required to examine the Tort of Negligence.

  2. concurrent liability(TM) in tort and contract.

    Many examples of this can be found in cases of professional negligence, e.g. where parties may also have a contractual relationship. (Doctors, surveyors, architects, etc). Also the method by which damages are assessed under tort and contract is very different.

  1. Consider the relationship between the torts of private nuisance and negligence and in doing ...

    So it has been argued that an element of fault is required for nuisance actions to succeed. In the Wagon Mound (No 2) 4case Lord Reid stated that: 'Nuisance is a term used to cover a wide variety of tortuous acts or omissions and in may negligence in the narrow

  2. "A duty of care arises not merely when damage is reasonably foreseeable, but when ...

    Liability of police - In 23Hill v CC of West Yorkshire [1988], where the police forces failed to detect the 'Yorkshire Ripper' before he murdered the plaintiff's daughter, the court held the Chief Constable could not be liable for policy purposes.

  1. Duty of Care.

    It provided for a 2 stage test - - Whether, as between the alleged wrongdoer and the person who suffered damage, there is sufficient relationship of proximity or neighborhood such that, in reasonable contemplation of the former, carelessness on his part may be likely to cause damage to the latter, in which case a prima facie duty of care arises.

  2. Discuss the justification for vicarious liability and whether the recent developments in case law ...

    The Mersey Docks principle has enabled the courts to choose between two possible employees. Today, in Viasystems (Tyneside) Limited v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Limited & Others, the principle of double indemnity was introduced. It was considered to be more appropriate to use the principles of double indemnity to share principles between two possible employers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work