• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Legal Report Writing Exercise In no more than 1500 words write a legal report for an employer on a dispute between the employer and an employee or group of employees.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 1 2004-5 Legal Report Writing Exercise This assignment carries 20% of your overall assessment in the module. It is to be submitted to the Faculty Resources Centre no later than Thursday 2 December 2004. Task In no more than 1500 words write a legal report for an employer on a dispute between the employer and an employee or group of employees. Paper copy of the details of the legal dispute were distributed in the week commencing 11 October 2004. If you have not received a paper copy of the case studies then click here This piece of work must be produced by your own research and writing (i.e. without collaboration with others) - see Faculty Cheating Statement given in the guidelines for assessment An example of a Legal Report can be found here (Note - This example demonstrates the style and structure of a legal report, it is not necessarily an entirely accurate piece of legal advice.) Assignment 1 Case Studies Case Study 1 Avril worked part time stitching handbags for Lozell & Co, a manufacturer of leather goods, from October 1999 to 10th October 2004. Until January 2004 she worked at their factory in Birmingham. She was paid a basic wage of �115 for a 20 hour week. Avril, become tired of travelling the 40 miles into work, told her employer that she intended to leave. Lozell told Avril that they did not want to lose her expertise and suggested to her that she could work at home. ...read more.

Middle

7 Abrahams - v - Performing Rights Society [1995] IRLR 486 8 Jupiter General Insurance Co - v - Shroff [1937] 3 All ER 67 PC 9 Blyth - v - Scottish Liberal Club [1983] IRLR 20 10 Jackson - v - Invicta Plastics [1987] 11 Boston Deep Sea Fishing - v - Ansell [ 1888] 12 S94 (1) Employment Rights Act 1996 13 S230(l) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996 14 S98 Employment Rights Act 1996 15 S98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 Page 2 of 6 5 Fairness of Procedure 5.1 If a dismissal is potentially fair, it may be rendered unfair by the means used to arrive at it. Proper procedures should be followed, particularly bearing in mind the ACAS Code of Practice (16). 5.2 The Employment Appeal Tribunal set out the standard for the conduct of disciplinary hearings (17), and its guidance set out a number of themes, many of which have not been followed in the case of Depp. 5.3 Any disciplinary hearing must be fair. Whilst Depp knew the nature of the allegation being made against him, it is unclear whether he was given sufficient detail to allow him to prepare a case (18). 5.4 It is unclear whether or not Depp has seen Vincent and Cushing's witness statements. He should normally be shown such statements (19), unless it was felt necessary to protect the anonymity of the witnesses (20). ...read more.

Conclusion

8.3 Reinstatement is unlikely to be ordered given the animosity between Grant and Depp (38). 8.4 Any award of compensation may be reduced by the tribunal in the light of Depp's misconduct 9 RECOMMENDATION 31 S120 (1) (A) Employment Rights Act 1996 32 S122 Employment Rights Act 1996 33 Cadbury Limited -v - Doddington [1977] ICR 982 34 British United Shoe Machinery Company - v - Clarke [1978] ICR 70 35 S 123 (1) Employment Rights Act 1996 36 Optikinetics Ltd - v - Whooley [1999] ICR 984 37 W Devis & Sons Ltd - v - Atkins [1976] 2 All ER 822 38 Coleman and Stephenson - v - Magnet Joinery Ltd [1974] ICR 25 Page 5 of 6 9.1 That Moonshine attempt to negotiate a full and final settlement with Depp in respect of his claim for Unfair Dismissal, having regard to both his degree of misconduct but also as Moonshine cannot successfully defend an Unfair Dismissal case, only argue about the level of compensation, with regard to the costs in terms of staff time, legal representation and the adverse publicity that would associate to the Moonshine brand from a widely-reported tribunal case. 9.2 Given that the dismissal was based on the effect that Depp's misconduct had on the image of the company, there can be little advantage to giving that misconduct a wider airing unless it becomes unavoidable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Employment Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Employment Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically assess how effective employment law is as a means of altering social attitudes.

    4 star(s)

    As well as a useful means of changing social attitudes. 1 Browne Ken, Sociology, second edition, Polity Press 1997. Page 107. 2 Contrary to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975), as will be discussed below. 3 I shall use the term positive action and affirmative action interchangeably; in general

  2. Ann Hopkins Case Analysis "A Case of the Legal and Ethical Issues PriceWaterHouse faced"

    The partners of PWC, consists of mainly males. It is not only Ann Hopkins with interpersonal issues in this case, but also the males involved in the partnership decision. Society has clouded their judgement of what is the right thing to do. The men involved are stuck in the ice-age era where men are the breadwinners and women's duties are solely domesticated.

  1. Employment law - 'Sam, one of the directors of the company feels uneasy about ...

    workers and interviewees would be able to use against Sam and his company. I discovered that in terms of making an initial complaint those involved with 'Type U Like' could either make a claim for wrongful or unfair dismissal (or both, although they would not be compensated twice), or alternatively

  2. Discuss and analyse the legal concept of protected trade dispute. Explain also whether, in ...

    however some do come from other sources. These rule books as acknowledged by the House of Lords in the case of Heatons Transport v TGWU (1972) are not drafted through the correct channels and therefore might not be complete and might be implied terms.

  1. Selwyn states that it is difficult to categorise working individuals because of the complexity ...

    of obligation on each side to create a contract of service."17 This illustrates that there is a very fine line that needs to be drawn, proving the difficulty courts have in identifying employment status. In Carmichael v National Power PLC,18 the courts used the multiple test, but emphasising the individual's

  2. Employee Status - In order for Carl to be able to bring a claim ...

    Publications Ltd v Tanton 8: * Personal Service: Held by Tanton to be an irreducible minimum whereby if one isn't personally obliged to work for the employer then an employment relationship doesn't exist - for example, a substitution clause in a contract where one can have someone substitute for them

  1. Defamation case of Cynthia Hyland v. Raytheon Technical Services Company, et al.

    February 28, 2003, Even has Hyland in his office and gives her a scathing performance review. Her first negative review ever at Raytheon 15. May 29, 2003, Mr. Even attends a human resources review meeting.

  2. Legal Reasoning Example - of Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd2 which deals ...

    She was told by a tribunal that she could not proceed with the claim as they agreed with her employer that she didn?t fall under the category of an employee.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work