• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Literal Rule Golden Rule and the Mischeif Rule

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule. The whole reason these rules are here is to interpret laws so that the legislation serves its purpose of which it was introduced. The rules examine the wording of the particular statute and are the most common approach of interpretation of the English legal system. The three rules take different approaches in the interpretation and some judges use one rule while another prefers to use another rule. That is why we have three rules not just one. This means that in English law the interpretation of statute may differ depending on which judge is hearing the case. Once an interpretation has been made, a judge can form a new precedent for future cases in the same area of law. Since the three rules can result in very varied outcomes, it is important to understand the three rules. The LITERAL RULE means that judges will give the word its original and literal meaning even if the result is not sensible or unfair. ...read more.

Middle

If the wording of the provision is capable of one meaning then you can choose from those meanings but go no further. The second view can be applied wider and means that if the meaning of the word is clear then that must be followed unless this would result in an unfair result. Then the golden rule can be applied wider and the meaning can be modified to make it and fair situation and to avoid and unfair situation. A good clear example would be In the case of Sigsworth. This was a case of murder and inheritance. Under s.46 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925, a person, could not inherit the estate of the decease if they had murdered that other person, otherwise the murderer would benefit from his/her crime. The MISCHIEF RULE is the oldest rule and gives the judge more flexibility and discretion in court that the other two rules. It is sometimes referred to as the rule in Heydon's case ((1584). It can be by the court used to interpret a statue but must consider the common law before the act was introduced. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we look at this case in the eyes of the golden rule, it would still be a not guilty result as they still take the word literally. The mischief rule gave them more flexibility to look at what the act was aiming to achieve therefore was successful. The three rules give very different outcome because the literal rule means you can only take the meaning of the word and apply it to the case in hand. Where the golden rule allows a little more flexibility as it can avoid an unfair result. The mischief rule is the oldest and most effective rule because it allows discretion and lots of flexibility to achieve the right results and fill in any gaps in the law. Still because words can have different meanings and the meaning of the word can change depending on its context, it is important to have established and understood rules of interpretation. Therefore, need for interpretation is obvious. In many instances, the wording in a statue can be ambiguous, obscure and meaningless. In order for Judges to determine the meaning of legislation, they approach it through the rules of construction. Robbie Higginson Law 1 15 January 2002 Question five ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal ...

    On a plain, or literal interpretation the 'deceased are not entitled to vote' so, Whiteley did not commit that crime. No doubt this was probably not the intent of Parliament in passing the piece of legislation, but is was the logical conclusion if one used the literal.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the Idea of the Rule of Law from Different Perspectives.

    The legislative also affirmed the first principle by passed an act which is the Crown Proceeding Act 1947 that gives individual right to sue the government if the government done a wrongful act.

  1. Explain what is meant by the rule of law.Consider whether the rule of law ...

    reduced if it has to be conducted within a framework of detailed legal regulation" 7. It is apparent, therefore, that it is necessary to depart from Dicey's strict definition to discover a more constitutionally relevant model.

  2. Explain both why the English courts have adopted the purposive approach to statutory interpretation, ...

    give effect to the purpose of legislation.'5 It has succeeded as the proper approach to the establishment of Parliament's will. However judges who favour the literal rule say that the purposive rule is too creative and ignores the clear words.

  1. Statutory Interpretation.

    The champion of this approach in English law was Lord Denning in the case of Magor and St Mellons v Newport Corporation (1950): "We sit here to find out the intention of Parliament and carry it out, and we do this better by filling in the gaps and making sense

  2. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of using the literal rule. Question . ...

    It can also lead to unjust as the best example is London and North Eastern Railway V Berriman (1946) where a widow seeked for compensation for the death of her husband, who died while filling oil boxes on the railway line.

  1. The Rule of Law

    The other was morality and from this perspective, Hayek said that to the extent that the State leaves the individual less room to make individual decision, it reduces their freedom. Joseph Raz however had other views as to a theory of what the Rule of Law is, and emphasised the importance and the need for State intervention.

  2. Consider what is meant by the rule of law, illustrating your answer by reference ...

    Also he expressed that Dicey had imagined the constitution as being central to the doctrine of the rule of law rather then considering the power of the public authorities. The principle of the rule of law acts as a restraint. It controls the power and the action of the Executive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work