• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Literal Rule Golden Rule and the Mischeif Rule

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule. The whole reason these rules are here is to interpret laws so that the legislation serves its purpose of which it was introduced. The rules examine the wording of the particular statute and are the most common approach of interpretation of the English legal system. The three rules take different approaches in the interpretation and some judges use one rule while another prefers to use another rule. That is why we have three rules not just one. This means that in English law the interpretation of statute may differ depending on which judge is hearing the case. Once an interpretation has been made, a judge can form a new precedent for future cases in the same area of law. Since the three rules can result in very varied outcomes, it is important to understand the three rules. The LITERAL RULE means that judges will give the word its original and literal meaning even if the result is not sensible or unfair. ...read more.

Middle

If the wording of the provision is capable of one meaning then you can choose from those meanings but go no further. The second view can be applied wider and means that if the meaning of the word is clear then that must be followed unless this would result in an unfair result. Then the golden rule can be applied wider and the meaning can be modified to make it and fair situation and to avoid and unfair situation. A good clear example would be In the case of Sigsworth. This was a case of murder and inheritance. Under s.46 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925, a person, could not inherit the estate of the decease if they had murdered that other person, otherwise the murderer would benefit from his/her crime. The MISCHIEF RULE is the oldest rule and gives the judge more flexibility and discretion in court that the other two rules. It is sometimes referred to as the rule in Heydon's case ((1584). It can be by the court used to interpret a statue but must consider the common law before the act was introduced. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we look at this case in the eyes of the golden rule, it would still be a not guilty result as they still take the word literally. The mischief rule gave them more flexibility to look at what the act was aiming to achieve therefore was successful. The three rules give very different outcome because the literal rule means you can only take the meaning of the word and apply it to the case in hand. Where the golden rule allows a little more flexibility as it can avoid an unfair result. The mischief rule is the oldest and most effective rule because it allows discretion and lots of flexibility to achieve the right results and fill in any gaps in the law. Still because words can have different meanings and the meaning of the word can change depending on its context, it is important to have established and understood rules of interpretation. Therefore, need for interpretation is obvious. In many instances, the wording in a statue can be ambiguous, obscure and meaningless. In order for Judges to determine the meaning of legislation, they approach it through the rules of construction. Robbie Higginson Law 1 15 January 2002 Question five ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal ...

    On a plain, or literal interpretation the 'deceased are not entitled to vote' so, Whiteley did not commit that crime. No doubt this was probably not the intent of Parliament in passing the piece of legislation, but is was the logical conclusion if one used the literal.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the Idea of the Rule of Law from Different Perspectives.

    The legislative also affirmed the first principle by passed an act which is the Crown Proceeding Act 1947 that gives individual right to sue the government if the government done a wrongful act.

  1. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of using the literal rule. Question . ...

    The mischief rule has been criticized because it allowed judges to be too creative. The literal rule has also been criticized by the Law Commission because in their 1969 report, they argued that 'to place undue emphasis on the literal meaning of words is to assume an unattainable perfection in draftsmanship."

  2. Explain what is meant by the rule of law.Consider whether the rule of law ...

    Anderson [1942] AC 206 of detention without trial. If our first definition of arbitrary power is accurate, then the rule of law would surely not apply to a constitution such as ours; one which is inherently reliant on arbitration, delegation and control through report and review.

  1. Trust Law: 'The rule that charities must not undertake political activity is unsatisfactory ...

    The opposing view is that judges are inherently bias due to their personal opinions inevitably influencing decisions, especially where discretion is employed, hence impartiality is maintained by the refusal to consider and therefore allow personal views to influence the decision The case law indicates that the courts have not followed

  2. Explain both why the English courts have adopted the purposive approach to statutory interpretation, ...

    It rejects the limitation of judges searching for the meaning of literal approach of the word of legislation itself. It suggests that judges should look beyond the ordinary meaning to get better understanding of the words. Court in Heydon's case suggests that the mischief rule could be used in the broader sense.

  1. "European Community Legislation is drafted in a way that requires a purposive approach to ...

    Jervis CJ said in Abley v Dale 1851"If the precise words used are plain and unambiguous, in our judgment we are bound to construe them in their ordinary sense, even though it does lead to an absurdity or manifest injustice".

  2. The Literal Rule.

    The Golden Rule This provide that if the literal rule gives an absurd result, which parliament could not have intended, then the judge can substitute a reasonable meaning in the light of the statute as a whole. Advantage of the golden rule The golden rule can prevent the absurdity and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work