Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2

Literal Rule Golden Rule and the Mischeif Rule

Do not show me this again

Are you in the right place?

Jump to Law and see how teachers think you should prepare in:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal rule, the golden rule and the mischief rule. The whole reason these rules are here is to interpret laws so that the legislation serves its purpose of which it was introduced. The rules examine the wording of the particular statute and are the most common approach of interpretation of the English legal system. The three rules take different approaches in the interpretation and some judges use one rule while another prefers to use another rule. That is why we have three rules not just one. This means that in English law the interpretation of statute may differ depending on which judge is hearing the case. Once an interpretation has been made, a judge can form a new precedent for future cases in the same area of law. Since the three rules can result in very varied outcomes, it is important to understand the three rules. The LITERAL RULE means that judges will give the word its original and literal meaning even if the result is not sensible or unfair. ...read more.

Middle

If the wording of the provision is capable of one meaning then you can choose from those meanings but go no further. The second view can be applied wider and means that if the meaning of the word is clear then that must be followed unless this would result in an unfair result. Then the golden rule can be applied wider and the meaning can be modified to make it and fair situation and to avoid and unfair situation. A good clear example would be In the case of Sigsworth. This was a case of murder and inheritance. Under s.46 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925, a person, could not inherit the estate of the decease if they had murdered that other person, otherwise the murderer would benefit from his/her crime. The MISCHIEF RULE is the oldest rule and gives the judge more flexibility and discretion in court that the other two rules. It is sometimes referred to as the rule in Heydon's case ((1584). It can be by the court used to interpret a statue but must consider the common law before the act was introduced. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we look at this case in the eyes of the golden rule, it would still be a not guilty result as they still take the word literally. The mischief rule gave them more flexibility to look at what the act was aiming to achieve therefore was successful. The three rules give very different outcome because the literal rule means you can only take the meaning of the word and apply it to the case in hand. Where the golden rule allows a little more flexibility as it can avoid an unfair result. The mischief rule is the oldest and most effective rule because it allows discretion and lots of flexibility to achieve the right results and fill in any gaps in the law. Still because words can have different meanings and the meaning of the word can change depending on its context, it is important to have established and understood rules of interpretation. Therefore, need for interpretation is obvious. In many instances, the wording in a statue can be ambiguous, obscure and meaningless. In order for Judges to determine the meaning of legislation, they approach it through the rules of construction. Robbie Higginson Law 1 15 January 2002 Question five ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Explain what is meant by the rule of law.Consider whether the rule of law ...

    exerted upon the masses via coercive methods. The obligation to obey the law is eroded as it is no longer reflective of the positive morality of the masses, which, in a sense validates its authority. Next we must explore Dicey's notion of equality before the law.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the Idea of the Rule of Law from Different Perspectives.

    He is in the opinion that, the idea of rule of law is an absolute value in which can only be present in the constitution to prevent government from intervening in social and economic welfare. He also stated that parliamentary sovereignty, and the rule of law should not be existing simultaneously since both of it are in contradiction.

  1. In law there are three different rules which have been set to interpret all ...

    The judge decided that the act was aimed to make it able for people to walk down the street without being solicited and even though the prostitute was not in the street herself, the act should be interpreted to include this activity.

  2. The Rule of Law

    His criticism was founded on two bases. One was efficiency, in which Hayek suggests the State cannot fully understand any individuals' situation and should therefore leave it to the individuals to make their own decisions about what they want, or how they choose to achieve what they want, as long as achieved in a legal way.

  1. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of using the literal rule. Question . ...

    It can also lead to unjust as the best example is London and North Eastern Railway V Berriman (1946) where a widow seeked for compensation for the death of her husband, who died while filling oil boxes on the railway line.

  2. Consider what is meant by the rule of law, illustrating your answer by reference ...

    judicial decisions being made on the basis of the constitution and protection for our rights and liberties. However significant this theory is, it has a number of critics stating that Dicey's theory is not absolutely correct. Professor Jennings, a constitutional law writer felt that Dicey's views and theories did not accurately reflect modern democratic order.

  1. When judges interpret statute, they have three rules to follow. These are the literal ...

    On a plain, or literal interpretation the 'deceased are not entitled to vote' so, Whiteley did not commit that crime. No doubt this was probably not the intent of Parliament in passing the piece of legislation, but is was the logical conclusion if one used the literal.

  2. Trust Law: 'The rule that charities must not undertake political activity is unsatisfactory ...

    Ultimately though, the question of political activity was one of degree, for the court to resolve. McGovern reaffirmed such principles, Amnesty International being denied charitable status, due to its objects being regarded as political, the achievement of such objects requiring the reform of government policy or administrative decisions.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.

Do not show me this again

Are you in the right place?

Jump to Law and see how teachers think you should prepare in: