• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offences Against the Person. Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212. Fatima Gurbanova 1103134 IA120 Audrey Woraker The sado-masochist group which ?willingly and enthusiastically?[1] applied violence upon each other in order to receive a sexual pleasure was held guilty under sections ?20 and 47 the Offences against Person Act 1861?[2]. Section 20 of the Offences against person act 1861 states: ?Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[3], section 47 states: ?Whosoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning actual bodily harm will be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[4]. Appellants being unsatisfied with the sentence of the court applied for appeal arguing that the act under which they were sentenced is inappropriate in the given conditions. The appellants were experiencing their sado-masochistic exercises on private property, without involving ?children, young persons (except for K. who was limited in contact) or animals?[5]. Their activities were not intended to be shown to public, and the tapes with their activities were intended only to be shown among the members of the group. ...read more.

Middle

home and his correspondence?[16] in their appeals, however Lord Lowry disagreed with this refer saying that the article 8 of the Convention is not a part of the English Law and links to the article 8 (2) of the Convention that states that ?no public authority can be said to have interfered with a right by enforcing the provisions of the Act 1861?[17]. In present case ?at least actual bodily harm?[18] was committed; therefore private life is no longer a right in given circumstances. Nonetheless, Lord Mustill in his decision defined the current case as nothing but the ?private sexual relations?[19] which is not a problem of the criminal law. The interesting point that was showed by Lord Mustill is that there are no suitable cases and no appropriate statutes to this case. ?The indictment was made only because no other statute was found which could conceivably be brought to bear upon them?[20]. Lord Slynn Hadley in his conclusion stated: ?adults can consent to acts done in private which do not result serious bodily harm?[21] and continues saying that therefore the present case cannot be classified as one of the cases that can be sentenced under the Offences Against Person Act 1861. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the court dismissed the appeal because the majority of the Lords held that the group of sado-masochists was applying violence on each other and their acts were unlawful. However, two other Lords (Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn Hadley) expressed the opposite opinion which was not without certain basis. The acts were committed in private, without any enforcement, all the participants were adults, able to understand what they were enacted. The injuries that the appellants had were not serious enough, and the actions that they were doing did not result any crucial consequence. The Offences against Person Act was established in order to punish the cases that include violence and enforcement, which are absent in the current case. It is seen from the Lord?s judgments that the main base for the Lords who dismissed the appeal was the disgust to the amoral activities enacted by the appellants; therefore the decision can be called a prejudice. Yes, the acts that were done by the appellants were perverted, and hardly can be called normal, but however they did not affect anyone except themselves and they were not against this; on the contrary they showed will to experience all the injuries that they had. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 provides that 'a person is guilty of ...

    Difficulty way well be found in proving that Angela acted dishonestly before Duncan gave her the first book as a gift. Also, there is no evidence that she makes any positive statements that mislead Duncan.

  2. Non Violence and Black Power: How differing conceptions of power led to the transition ...

    the basis of the social order, but on the contrary, through open, peaceful and willing acceptance of the penalty for its breach, the civil disobedient "is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law" (in Young,1970,p.337). King's philosophy of NVDA, both its theoretical and ethical basis and the strategies

  1. Essay on how judges decide cases

    the greatest twentieth-century exponents of the position known as 'Legal Positivism'.8 In order to understand how Hart purports as to how judges decide cases, it is first necessary to understand his concept of what law is and what is contained within any given legal system.

  2. Unlawful Act Manslaughter

    The sentence can reflect the degree of the accused's culpability since manslaughter can range from unfortunate 'accidents' to killings which come close to being classified as murder. At this top end, the substantive issue in cases such as Moloney, Hancock and Nedrick was the borderline where we must distinguish the highly culpable 'manslaughter' from murder .

  1. Protecting Human Rights in the UK - Case notes: Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor ...

    As stated in Goodwin "A test of congruent biological factors can no longer be decisive in denying legal recognition."5 Mrs Bellinger successfully claimed that s11 (c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act was incompatible with 2 articles of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  2. Reform Acts

    Regis gave up two of their four MPs Enfranchisement >65 seats were awarded to the counties >44 seats were distributed to 22 larger towns including Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and the new London metropolitan districts >21 smaller towns were given one MP each >Scotland was awarded 8 extra seats >Ireland

  1. Detention violates European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    the bill will "introduce some of the most stringent infringements on civil liberties in Britain since the second world war."III This form of legislation is displayed as a 'provisional' measure to combat terrorism, although such bills have historically been prolonged infringements on freedom.

  2. Perhaps the most pertinent issue regarding the justification of torture is the ongoing and ...

    strongest proponents of torture into debating the justification of torture with reference to this case. The essence of the argument essentially comes down to torture as a means to save life, that is to say that torture can be justified by saving the lives of innocents.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work