• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offences Against the Person. Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212. Fatima Gurbanova 1103134 IA120 Audrey Woraker The sado-masochist group which ?willingly and enthusiastically?[1] applied violence upon each other in order to receive a sexual pleasure was held guilty under sections ?20 and 47 the Offences against Person Act 1861?[2]. Section 20 of the Offences against person act 1861 states: ?Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[3], section 47 states: ?Whosoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning actual bodily harm will be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[4]. Appellants being unsatisfied with the sentence of the court applied for appeal arguing that the act under which they were sentenced is inappropriate in the given conditions. The appellants were experiencing their sado-masochistic exercises on private property, without involving ?children, young persons (except for K. who was limited in contact) or animals?[5]. Their activities were not intended to be shown to public, and the tapes with their activities were intended only to be shown among the members of the group. ...read more.

Middle

home and his correspondence?[16] in their appeals, however Lord Lowry disagreed with this refer saying that the article 8 of the Convention is not a part of the English Law and links to the article 8 (2) of the Convention that states that ?no public authority can be said to have interfered with a right by enforcing the provisions of the Act 1861?[17]. In present case ?at least actual bodily harm?[18] was committed; therefore private life is no longer a right in given circumstances. Nonetheless, Lord Mustill in his decision defined the current case as nothing but the ?private sexual relations?[19] which is not a problem of the criminal law. The interesting point that was showed by Lord Mustill is that there are no suitable cases and no appropriate statutes to this case. ?The indictment was made only because no other statute was found which could conceivably be brought to bear upon them?[20]. Lord Slynn Hadley in his conclusion stated: ?adults can consent to acts done in private which do not result serious bodily harm?[21] and continues saying that therefore the present case cannot be classified as one of the cases that can be sentenced under the Offences Against Person Act 1861. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the court dismissed the appeal because the majority of the Lords held that the group of sado-masochists was applying violence on each other and their acts were unlawful. However, two other Lords (Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn Hadley) expressed the opposite opinion which was not without certain basis. The acts were committed in private, without any enforcement, all the participants were adults, able to understand what they were enacted. The injuries that the appellants had were not serious enough, and the actions that they were doing did not result any crucial consequence. The Offences against Person Act was established in order to punish the cases that include violence and enforcement, which are absent in the current case. It is seen from the Lord?s judgments that the main base for the Lords who dismissed the appeal was the disgust to the amoral activities enacted by the appellants; therefore the decision can be called a prejudice. Yes, the acts that were done by the appellants were perverted, and hardly can be called normal, but however they did not affect anyone except themselves and they were not against this; on the contrary they showed will to experience all the injuries that they had. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 provides that 'a person is guilty of ...

    Difficulty way well be found in proving that Angela acted dishonestly before Duncan gave her the first book as a gift. Also, there is no evidence that she makes any positive statements that mislead Duncan.

  2. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    103 Ibid 104 Ibid 105 Ibid. In many FGM-practising societies, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for a woman to marry if she has not undergone mutilation.

  1. Detention violates European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    Government can opt out of Article 5 in the ECHR We must consider what the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 are supposedly violating in terms of detention. If declared a state of emergency the government can opt out of Article 5 of the ECHR, which bans detention without trial.

  2. Non Violence and Black Power: How differing conceptions of power led to the transition ...

    However, although perceived as 'radical' in the mid-1950's, these tactics, as earlier noted, can be considered consistent with the pluralist framework of social change. Though increasingly militant, the emerging civil rights organisations provided a reformist, rather than radical analysis of the political arrangements of American society, and black American's potential for effective participation within it.

  1. Essay on how judges decide cases

    judgments, as promulgated by Justice Albie Sachs, it is now much more evident as to what he refers to as being the lie in every judgment. Although his judgments told their story in such an orderly, clear, sequential narrative form, they had in fact emerged from an inchoate, even chaotic,

  2. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    In this respect, the most important treaty is the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 1883 as revised from time to time. It provides that an applicant from one contracting state shall be able to use its first filing date (in one of the contracting state)

  1. Protecting Human Rights in the UK - Case notes: Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor ...

    As stated in Goodwin "A test of congruent biological factors can no longer be decisive in denying legal recognition."5 Mrs Bellinger successfully claimed that s11 (c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act was incompatible with 2 articles of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  2. Marriage in the 21 century

    divide between what the Church see as their view on marriage and what the modern view is. The Church's view on marriage stems from one of the biblical passage of Adam and Eve, and how they regulate marriage is determined by the Bible and scripture.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work