• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offences Against the Person. Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212. Fatima Gurbanova 1103134 IA120 Audrey Woraker The sado-masochist group which ?willingly and enthusiastically?[1] applied violence upon each other in order to receive a sexual pleasure was held guilty under sections ?20 and 47 the Offences against Person Act 1861?[2]. Section 20 of the Offences against person act 1861 states: ?Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[3], section 47 states: ?Whosoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning actual bodily harm will be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[4]. Appellants being unsatisfied with the sentence of the court applied for appeal arguing that the act under which they were sentenced is inappropriate in the given conditions. The appellants were experiencing their sado-masochistic exercises on private property, without involving ?children, young persons (except for K. who was limited in contact) or animals?[5]. Their activities were not intended to be shown to public, and the tapes with their activities were intended only to be shown among the members of the group. ...read more.

Middle

home and his correspondence?[16] in their appeals, however Lord Lowry disagreed with this refer saying that the article 8 of the Convention is not a part of the English Law and links to the article 8 (2) of the Convention that states that ?no public authority can be said to have interfered with a right by enforcing the provisions of the Act 1861?[17]. In present case ?at least actual bodily harm?[18] was committed; therefore private life is no longer a right in given circumstances. Nonetheless, Lord Mustill in his decision defined the current case as nothing but the ?private sexual relations?[19] which is not a problem of the criminal law. The interesting point that was showed by Lord Mustill is that there are no suitable cases and no appropriate statutes to this case. ?The indictment was made only because no other statute was found which could conceivably be brought to bear upon them?[20]. Lord Slynn Hadley in his conclusion stated: ?adults can consent to acts done in private which do not result serious bodily harm?[21] and continues saying that therefore the present case cannot be classified as one of the cases that can be sentenced under the Offences Against Person Act 1861. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the court dismissed the appeal because the majority of the Lords held that the group of sado-masochists was applying violence on each other and their acts were unlawful. However, two other Lords (Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn Hadley) expressed the opposite opinion which was not without certain basis. The acts were committed in private, without any enforcement, all the participants were adults, able to understand what they were enacted. The injuries that the appellants had were not serious enough, and the actions that they were doing did not result any crucial consequence. The Offences against Person Act was established in order to punish the cases that include violence and enforcement, which are absent in the current case. It is seen from the Lord?s judgments that the main base for the Lords who dismissed the appeal was the disgust to the amoral activities enacted by the appellants; therefore the decision can be called a prejudice. Yes, the acts that were done by the appellants were perverted, and hardly can be called normal, but however they did not affect anyone except themselves and they were not against this; on the contrary they showed will to experience all the injuries that they had. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Perhaps the most pertinent issue regarding the justification of torture is the ongoing and ...

    The sheer number of those arrested and detained since the beginning of the 'war on terror' that have been released due to lack of evidence is testament to this.6 In assuming that the person detained is undoubtedly a terrorist is vastly different from reality, and moreover, if enough evidence exists

  2. Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 provides that 'a person is guilty of ...

    According to R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053, Angela will be dishonest if '...according to the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people what was done was dishonest. If it was not dishonest by those standards, that is the end of the matter and the prosecution fails.

  1. Essay on how judges decide cases

    mental firmament quite different from that suggested by their ultimate assured expression. I will now turn my attention to the view of adjudication as expressed by H.L.A. Hart, who was not only an experienced and successful practitioner of law, but also a professional philosopher being widely regarded as one of

  2. Court of Appeal (Criminal Division).

    in relation to the prohibited place". The engineer who initially spotted the appellant was working in the engine rooms performing his day-to-day duties. He was unable to continue with his regular duties as he had discovered an intruder. He gave chase to the appellant and in doing so had to stop the task that he was performing in the engine room.

  1. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    There are political rights to participate in "genuine elections" and cultural rights to develop one's personality28. Economic rights include the right to work, to favourable pay, to join trade unions, and to paid holidays. Human beings also have welfare rights to social security, to health care, to special assistance for

  2. Libertarian Welfare Rights. An Inquiry into the Coherence of Some Common Libertarian Commitments

    So, even non-libertarians should be happy if this paper can convince libertarians that states have to help some of these people. Finally, it is important not to overlook this paper's philosophical virtues. It would be incredible if this paper can show that libertarians should accept any welfare rights.

  1. Case note on - Percy v Director of Pubic Prosecution [1995] 3 All ER ...

    In addition there is a twin requirement of balancing individual rights and the rights of the general public. Both extremes need to be met, tolerated and accommodated. Each of these issues can be taken in more detail. Breach of the Peace As previously mentioned the District Judge took Lord Denning's

  2. Non Violence and Black Power: How differing conceptions of power led to the transition ...

    civil rights movement to make gains through peaceful persuasion gave way to a more assertive and more aggressive stance. For Carmichael and Hamilton, 'black power' meant black unity, black self determination and black confrontation of a white racist society (1967).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work