• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offences Against the Person. Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Case note regarding R. v Brown [1994] 1 A.C. 212. Fatima Gurbanova 1103134 IA120 Audrey Woraker The sado-masochist group which ?willingly and enthusiastically?[1] applied violence upon each other in order to receive a sexual pleasure was held guilty under sections ?20 and 47 the Offences against Person Act 1861?[2]. Section 20 of the Offences against person act 1861 states: ?Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[3], section 47 states: ?Whosoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning actual bodily harm will be liable to be kept in penal servitude?[4]. Appellants being unsatisfied with the sentence of the court applied for appeal arguing that the act under which they were sentenced is inappropriate in the given conditions. The appellants were experiencing their sado-masochistic exercises on private property, without involving ?children, young persons (except for K. who was limited in contact) or animals?[5]. Their activities were not intended to be shown to public, and the tapes with their activities were intended only to be shown among the members of the group. ...read more.

Middle

home and his correspondence?[16] in their appeals, however Lord Lowry disagreed with this refer saying that the article 8 of the Convention is not a part of the English Law and links to the article 8 (2) of the Convention that states that ?no public authority can be said to have interfered with a right by enforcing the provisions of the Act 1861?[17]. In present case ?at least actual bodily harm?[18] was committed; therefore private life is no longer a right in given circumstances. Nonetheless, Lord Mustill in his decision defined the current case as nothing but the ?private sexual relations?[19] which is not a problem of the criminal law. The interesting point that was showed by Lord Mustill is that there are no suitable cases and no appropriate statutes to this case. ?The indictment was made only because no other statute was found which could conceivably be brought to bear upon them?[20]. Lord Slynn Hadley in his conclusion stated: ?adults can consent to acts done in private which do not result serious bodily harm?[21] and continues saying that therefore the present case cannot be classified as one of the cases that can be sentenced under the Offences Against Person Act 1861. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the court dismissed the appeal because the majority of the Lords held that the group of sado-masochists was applying violence on each other and their acts were unlawful. However, two other Lords (Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn Hadley) expressed the opposite opinion which was not without certain basis. The acts were committed in private, without any enforcement, all the participants were adults, able to understand what they were enacted. The injuries that the appellants had were not serious enough, and the actions that they were doing did not result any crucial consequence. The Offences against Person Act was established in order to punish the cases that include violence and enforcement, which are absent in the current case. It is seen from the Lord?s judgments that the main base for the Lords who dismissed the appeal was the disgust to the amoral activities enacted by the appellants; therefore the decision can be called a prejudice. Yes, the acts that were done by the appellants were perverted, and hardly can be called normal, but however they did not affect anyone except themselves and they were not against this; on the contrary they showed will to experience all the injuries that they had. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 provides that 'a person is guilty of ...

    If it was dishonest by those standards, then the jury must consider whether the defendant himself must have realised that what he was doing was by those standards dishonest ' Angela clearly had intention to permanently deprive Duncan of the books since she took them to be valued and therefore

  2. Detention violates European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    All citizens of the world, including those suspected of being a terrorist under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, have rights and liberties. As supported by ECHR Article 5 "Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person".VI The Home Secretary is given the power to certify that

  1. Non Violence and Black Power: How differing conceptions of power led to the transition ...

    Section Three: From Non-Violence to Black Power Differing conceptions of the power structure of American society and of black America's ability to participate in the decision making process led, as indicated in the previous sections, to the development and adoption of different strategies and tactics in the struggle to achieve racial equality.

  2. Essay on how judges decide cases

    issue, to understand the context and to appreciate the impact of the reasoning on those affected by it. This leads him to claim, that in short, it is the legal rhetoric that persuades, and not just the formal logic.7 Having explored the thought processes involved in the construction of his

  1. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    a process (or method) or a use. Further more, the application must contain an abstract of the invention which describes technical information. The request shall state the name of and other prescribed data concerning the person making the application, the inventor and the agent if any (section 18(2)

  2. Protecting Human Rights in the UK - Case notes: Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor ...

    As stated in Goodwin "A test of congruent biological factors can no longer be decisive in denying legal recognition."5 Mrs Bellinger successfully claimed that s11 (c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act was incompatible with 2 articles of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  1. Marriage in the 21 century

    According to the first book of the Bible, Genesis Adam and Eve were the first union of man and woman, and therefore the only relationship that is deemed worthy of marriage is a heterosexual partnership. This also stems from what the Church see as a primary goal of marriage, it

  2. Reform Acts

    This last bit of discrimination was eliminated 10 years later (in 1928) by the Equal Franchise Act. Terms of the 1832 Reform Act Disenfranchisement Clauses >56 nomination or rotten boroughs returning 111 MPs lost their representation >30 boroughs with less than 4,000 inhabitants lost one MP each >Weymouth and Melcombe

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work