• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offender Profiling...............USA or UK?

Extracts from this document...


Aneeq Mushtaq Offender Profiling...............USA or UK? Offender profiling aims to present a composite description of a perpetrator, based on biographical and behavioural cues that can lead to the apprehension of that perpetrator. Profiling techniques have been used to narrow the focus of an investigation (by specifying the perpetrators location, sex or age) or to provide suggestions for interviewing suspects (McCann, 1992). As a result of collecting data and analysing evidence, the use of such techniques have led to arrests of serious criminals such as John Duffy (UK), who murdered his victims near railways (Canter 1989). This assignment will aim to compare and contrast the FBI's 'Crime Scene Analysis' of offender profiling with that of David Canter's 'Five Factor Model. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach will be highlighted including the main differences between profiling in the USA and UK. Due to the rapid increase of serial murders and rapes in the USA within the 1970's, the FBI invented the first systematic approach of offender profiling. Counteracting the rising numbers of serial murders lead to the development to the Behavioural Sciences Unit (BSU). BSU interviewed 36 convicted sexually orientated murderers and classified them into organised (average / above average intelligence, crime planned) or disorganised (low intelligence, messy crime scene, clues left behind) typologies, depending on demographic and crime scene characteristics (Burger et al, 1986). ...read more.


The principal foundation of the FBI system is situated within the organised and disorganised offender dichotomy (Geberth, 1996). For example, It sees the organised offender as socially competent, living with partner and having average to above average intelligence. The unorganised offender on the other hand is seen to be socially inadequate, living alone and having a below average intelligence. Other individuals are also highly critical of the FBI's methods. Holmes and DeBurger (1988) argue that federal agencies like the FBI have minimal experience in investigating murder cases, opting rather to suggest that it would be better for local agencies to train their own officers in the particulars of such investigations. A criticism of the FBI could also be that there could be instances where an organised offender may eventually leave a disorganised crime scene (Turvey, 1999). These offenders could be acting out in retaliation, domestic violence related offenders or because they are not mentally well at the time of the crime i.e. depression (Turvey, 1999). This would lead to analysts to incorrectly provide the characteristics of one group of offenders as the profile, when in actual fact, the offender possesses the characteristic of another group, if a group at all, as in some instances, it may not be possible to place people into categories for example, almost everyone experiences some from depression and can do things that they would not have done if they were not experiencing depression but this does not necessarily mean that their characteristics will change. ...read more.


It maybe argued that unlike David Canters (British) approach in which implement a scientific methodology and statistical profiling, the FBI do not validate their theories and beliefs, on the contrary, opting to use methods that are subjective rather then objective and nor was any statistical test performed to establish the validity the validity of their conclusions. Additionally, the use of a sample consisting of 36 people is to unrepresentative and applying to results and findings to a wider population can be extremely difficult. This can lead to profiles being developed where the suspected offenders characteristics are being placed to fit, even though they would not fit the profile. Nonetheless, statistical processes such as those of David Canter may have their weaknesses, they are at lest clear and unambiguous, allowing other researchers to replicate studies in order to test hypothesis and or developing competing hypothesis. The use of profiling is questionable in the court of law and many legal systems will not recognise a profiler as an expert witness. This has led Alison et al (2003) to recommend that profiling be treated with extreme caution in criminal investigation and should not be used as evidence in the courts until research has proven its predictive validity. In conclusion, it maybe relevant to point out that the use of profiling does have merit in certain cases although more research and investigations are needed to validate its continued use and the profiling appears unclear as this happens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Highly detailed. A brilliant essay.

5 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The search of Arnold - Police stop and search powers.

    5 star(s)

    It seems that the police officer did not take all reasonable steps in trying to provide this information, which would make the stop and search unlawful, as shown in Mustapha Osman v Southwark Crown Court21 There is also a duty to record the search unless it is not practicable to do so22.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law - Problem Question - Homicide

    4 star(s)

    In this subjective approach to mens rea, account can be taken of the defendant's individual characteristics (Stephenson17). Alan had apparently been hearing voices and thought that Brian was the devil. However, this did not lower his ability to perceive a risk, even though his perception was deluded about who he was about to injure.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law,dealing with the subject of murder and how applying the general principles of ...

    4 star(s)

    John has done this after he had seen the flare hitting Pablo and failed to do anything to help then can he be held liable for murder? 'Unless a statute specifically provides, or the common law imposes a duty upon one person to act in a particular way to another...a

  2. problem question on murder

    S.8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 provides that 'a court and jury in determining whether he intended or foresaw a prohibited result' (subjective test)11 in the case of Hancock and Shankland [1986]12, R v Nedrick [1986]13 and Woolin [1998]14 the decision based on foresight.

  1. Sexual Offences Act 2003 - The Problem of Consent and Intoxication.

    As the above mentioned cases have illustrated, there is a lack of consistency in the decisions made by the Trial court judges, wherein most of them have made fundamental mistakes regarding the issue of consent in general and capacity to consent in particular.

  2. Murder/manslaughter problem question

    was seen in Saunders the jury has the power to dismiss even unanimous medical opinion when considering diminished responsibility cases. -------- 2) Leaving Miles injured in his room Swot's defence of automatism may be sufficient to acquit him of the act of stabbing Miles.

  1. What was the impact of the decision of R v G and R?

    However, the expression 'reckless' is considered to have a wider capacity for interpretation. Therefore this modification of expressions portrays a positive impact of the decision of the House of Lords in RvG. The reasonable adult was an issue raised in RvG from the objective approach in the Caldwell test.

  2. 'Reintegration of Offenders'- what does this mean?

    Therefore, according to Roberts and Johnstone it is necessary to have, and expand, positive programs in communities that help offender reintegration. The expansion of rehabilitative programs in Queensland was helped with the 1988 Kennedy Report. This report shifted the focus of the Queensland Corrective Services towards rehabilitation and reintegration (Ringrose 2001, 3).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work