• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offender Profiling...............USA or UK?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aneeq Mushtaq Offender Profiling...............USA or UK? Offender profiling aims to present a composite description of a perpetrator, based on biographical and behavioural cues that can lead to the apprehension of that perpetrator. Profiling techniques have been used to narrow the focus of an investigation (by specifying the perpetrators location, sex or age) or to provide suggestions for interviewing suspects (McCann, 1992). As a result of collecting data and analysing evidence, the use of such techniques have led to arrests of serious criminals such as John Duffy (UK), who murdered his victims near railways (Canter 1989). This assignment will aim to compare and contrast the FBI's 'Crime Scene Analysis' of offender profiling with that of David Canter's 'Five Factor Model. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach will be highlighted including the main differences between profiling in the USA and UK. Due to the rapid increase of serial murders and rapes in the USA within the 1970's, the FBI invented the first systematic approach of offender profiling. Counteracting the rising numbers of serial murders lead to the development to the Behavioural Sciences Unit (BSU). BSU interviewed 36 convicted sexually orientated murderers and classified them into organised (average / above average intelligence, crime planned) or disorganised (low intelligence, messy crime scene, clues left behind) typologies, depending on demographic and crime scene characteristics (Burger et al, 1986). ...read more.

Middle

The principal foundation of the FBI system is situated within the organised and disorganised offender dichotomy (Geberth, 1996). For example, It sees the organised offender as socially competent, living with partner and having average to above average intelligence. The unorganised offender on the other hand is seen to be socially inadequate, living alone and having a below average intelligence. Other individuals are also highly critical of the FBI's methods. Holmes and DeBurger (1988) argue that federal agencies like the FBI have minimal experience in investigating murder cases, opting rather to suggest that it would be better for local agencies to train their own officers in the particulars of such investigations. A criticism of the FBI could also be that there could be instances where an organised offender may eventually leave a disorganised crime scene (Turvey, 1999). These offenders could be acting out in retaliation, domestic violence related offenders or because they are not mentally well at the time of the crime i.e. depression (Turvey, 1999). This would lead to analysts to incorrectly provide the characteristics of one group of offenders as the profile, when in actual fact, the offender possesses the characteristic of another group, if a group at all, as in some instances, it may not be possible to place people into categories for example, almost everyone experiences some from depression and can do things that they would not have done if they were not experiencing depression but this does not necessarily mean that their characteristics will change. ...read more.

Conclusion

It maybe argued that unlike David Canters (British) approach in which implement a scientific methodology and statistical profiling, the FBI do not validate their theories and beliefs, on the contrary, opting to use methods that are subjective rather then objective and nor was any statistical test performed to establish the validity the validity of their conclusions. Additionally, the use of a sample consisting of 36 people is to unrepresentative and applying to results and findings to a wider population can be extremely difficult. This can lead to profiles being developed where the suspected offenders characteristics are being placed to fit, even though they would not fit the profile. Nonetheless, statistical processes such as those of David Canter may have their weaknesses, they are at lest clear and unambiguous, allowing other researchers to replicate studies in order to test hypothesis and or developing competing hypothesis. The use of profiling is questionable in the court of law and many legal systems will not recognise a profiler as an expert witness. This has led Alison et al (2003) to recommend that profiling be treated with extreme caution in criminal investigation and should not be used as evidence in the courts until research has proven its predictive validity. In conclusion, it maybe relevant to point out that the use of profiling does have merit in certain cases although more research and investigations are needed to validate its continued use and the profiling appears unclear as this happens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Highly detailed. A brilliant essay.

5 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "All inchoate offences should be abolished on the theory that society is not harmed ...

    3 star(s)

    The present way, conspiracy is an offence even if one person has no intention of seeing the offence through but they have intended to take some part in the conspiracy, the person would be found guilty of conspiracy. This was the case with Anderson 1986, where he had agreed with

  2. problem question on murder

    Even though, Boris would be convicted for murder he may raise a defense on the basis of provocation and diminished responsibility19 what could reduce the conviction of murder to voluntary manslaughter. Whether Boris has killed Ali or not, he shall not be convicted of murder if he was suffering from

  1. Why is Feminism important for Criminology?

    Voigt et al, in their book called 'criminology and justice', make particular mention of the inadequacies of criminology texts suggesting that 'criminology is nothing more than specialised theories of male delinquency and crime' (White, R. D. 2000). Gelsthorpe (1990) argued that women are discriminated against areas such as crime because

  2. Outline the key points of New Right criminology. Critically analyse the impact it has ...

    Before this time policy making was slow and the major policies were spread out by 20 years . By 1991 there were major policies spread just a couple of years apart. Reform of the criminal justice system was a major part of the 1990's.

  1. R v Nedrick and R v Woollin: intention in murder.

    you should convict him of murder The appellant's substantial point of appeal was that in directing the jury in terms of 'substantial risk', the judge unacceptably enlarged the mental element of murder. Giving judgment in the Court of Appeal, Roch LJ observed about Nedrick at page 107, that although the

  2. Discuss the Strengths and the Weaknesses of conservative Criticisms of Liberal Democracy.

    Another difference between them is that the liberal ideologists, as mentioned, believe in individual rights and equality for all. This was seen to be a criticism in view of those whose values lied with the conservative ideologies. They believed that if you were entitled to rights then you would receive them, and not other wise.

  1. After Woollin, the law of Intention remains unclear, but nonetheless works in a satisfactory ...

    The court held that if D?s act were as consistent with an innocent intent, the jury should be left to decide the matter. This diverges from the standard definition, since it was never discussed whether D knew that it was virtually certain his acts would assist the enemy.[20] This highlights

  2. Criminal Law-Homicide problem question - Guinevere dies from Lancelots attempts to muffle her protests.

    Arthur kills Guinevere with his sword In order to determine the criminal liability of Arthur in this situation, it is necessary to establish if Arthur will be guilty for murder or not from his actus reus and mens rea. His grounds for defence will also be considered to evaluate his criminal liability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work