• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Offender Profiling...............USA or UK?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aneeq Mushtaq Offender Profiling...............USA or UK? Offender profiling aims to present a composite description of a perpetrator, based on biographical and behavioural cues that can lead to the apprehension of that perpetrator. Profiling techniques have been used to narrow the focus of an investigation (by specifying the perpetrators location, sex or age) or to provide suggestions for interviewing suspects (McCann, 1992). As a result of collecting data and analysing evidence, the use of such techniques have led to arrests of serious criminals such as John Duffy (UK), who murdered his victims near railways (Canter 1989). This assignment will aim to compare and contrast the FBI's 'Crime Scene Analysis' of offender profiling with that of David Canter's 'Five Factor Model. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach will be highlighted including the main differences between profiling in the USA and UK. Due to the rapid increase of serial murders and rapes in the USA within the 1970's, the FBI invented the first systematic approach of offender profiling. Counteracting the rising numbers of serial murders lead to the development to the Behavioural Sciences Unit (BSU). BSU interviewed 36 convicted sexually orientated murderers and classified them into organised (average / above average intelligence, crime planned) or disorganised (low intelligence, messy crime scene, clues left behind) typologies, depending on demographic and crime scene characteristics (Burger et al, 1986). ...read more.

Middle

The principal foundation of the FBI system is situated within the organised and disorganised offender dichotomy (Geberth, 1996). For example, It sees the organised offender as socially competent, living with partner and having average to above average intelligence. The unorganised offender on the other hand is seen to be socially inadequate, living alone and having a below average intelligence. Other individuals are also highly critical of the FBI's methods. Holmes and DeBurger (1988) argue that federal agencies like the FBI have minimal experience in investigating murder cases, opting rather to suggest that it would be better for local agencies to train their own officers in the particulars of such investigations. A criticism of the FBI could also be that there could be instances where an organised offender may eventually leave a disorganised crime scene (Turvey, 1999). These offenders could be acting out in retaliation, domestic violence related offenders or because they are not mentally well at the time of the crime i.e. depression (Turvey, 1999). This would lead to analysts to incorrectly provide the characteristics of one group of offenders as the profile, when in actual fact, the offender possesses the characteristic of another group, if a group at all, as in some instances, it may not be possible to place people into categories for example, almost everyone experiences some from depression and can do things that they would not have done if they were not experiencing depression but this does not necessarily mean that their characteristics will change. ...read more.

Conclusion

It maybe argued that unlike David Canters (British) approach in which implement a scientific methodology and statistical profiling, the FBI do not validate their theories and beliefs, on the contrary, opting to use methods that are subjective rather then objective and nor was any statistical test performed to establish the validity the validity of their conclusions. Additionally, the use of a sample consisting of 36 people is to unrepresentative and applying to results and findings to a wider population can be extremely difficult. This can lead to profiles being developed where the suspected offenders characteristics are being placed to fit, even though they would not fit the profile. Nonetheless, statistical processes such as those of David Canter may have their weaknesses, they are at lest clear and unambiguous, allowing other researchers to replicate studies in order to test hypothesis and or developing competing hypothesis. The use of profiling is questionable in the court of law and many legal systems will not recognise a profiler as an expert witness. This has led Alison et al (2003) to recommend that profiling be treated with extreme caution in criminal investigation and should not be used as evidence in the courts until research has proven its predictive validity. In conclusion, it maybe relevant to point out that the use of profiling does have merit in certain cases although more research and investigations are needed to validate its continued use and the profiling appears unclear as this happens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Highly detailed. A brilliant essay.

5 Stars.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "All inchoate offences should be abolished on the theory that society is not harmed ...

    3 star(s)

    The present way, conspiracy is an offence even if one person has no intention of seeing the offence through but they have intended to take some part in the conspiracy, the person would be found guilty of conspiracy. This was the case with Anderson 1986, where he had agreed with

  2. Right to Silence. The privilege against right to silence and self-incrimination go hand in ...

    or not the accused had access to legal advice, * The fairness and reasonableness of the inference which were actually drawn by the court, or * Offence of not answering questions. The second area that impinges on privilege against self-incrimination and the right to silence is that which makes it

  1. problem question on murder

    The prosecution will look at the case Cheshire 19916. In this case, the court ruled 'Even though negligence medical treatment was the immediate cause of death that should not exclude the accused responsibility' and the accused act was the significant cause of death. Furthermore, if Boris wants to use medical negligence for his defense, then he must prove that

  2. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of psychological (offender) profiling.

    Profiling can aid an investigation in the following ways: It helps to narrow the search greatly and enables investigators to focus on individuals with similar personality traits of others who have committed very similar offences in the past (Pinizzotto, 1984).

  1. The Criminal Justice Process - 'Stop and Search is used discriminatorily by the police'

    more likely to be repeatedly stopped, more likely to be searched and more likely to be arrested. (Sanders, 1997). A potential explanation for this high proportion of stops on black people could be that black people do commit particular types of crime more often than white people do, and so are more probable to be targeted by the police.

  2. Criminal Law-Homicide problem question - Guinevere dies from Lancelots attempts to muffle her protests.

    when he saw Guinevere and Lancelot. However, it is uncertain if there were other factors that could could have led to his loss of control that may constitute to ?circumstances of extremely grave character? under S.54(4)(a) of the act.[16] On the other hand, a basis for sexual infidelity is to

  1. Compare the defence of provocation to the new defence of Loss of control

    At present, the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, has drastically reduced the scope, as it permits only the exceedingly serious circumstances, in this regard. Moreover, these circumstances should have the capacity to produce in the defendant the sense of having been seriously wronged.

  2. After Woollin, the law of Intention remains unclear, but nonetheless works in a satisfactory ...

    models in which future cases could follow they have been apprehensive in defining the term. The models they had set had been unclear, and created even more confusion with regard to the distinction of intention and recklessness and intention and causation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work