• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Principals of Law.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Principals of Law Coursework R.J. Carmichael Contents Introduction Brief Definitions Task 1- What Remedies does Mary have Against Tom Task 2- Spartacus Graduates with 1st class honours. Is Sir Harry Bound in contract to pay Spartacus? Task 2- Suppose Sir Harry had said "If you buy a suitable boat and trailer I will reward you with £1000". Is Sir Harry Bound in Contract to Spartacus? Cases- List of cases used. Bibliography- List of material used Introduction Mozley and Whitleys Law Dictionary1 states a contract to be, "An agreement between competent persons, upon legal consideration, to do or abstain from doing some act." For the purpose of this essay we will look at the classical contract model. This consists of three essential members:- 1) Agreement- to do something in return for a promise. 2) Consideration- exchange of something of value (but not necessarily of equal value) 3) Intension to be bound- to make a binding agreement, enforceable in law. Although they make up the essential members other requirements must be met. These include compliance with Common Law and Statute (e.g. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1997), or other legal requirements (e.g. age of consent) It must also be noted that the agreement requirement of a contract is split up into two essential components. ...read more.

Middle

goods to a person, stipulating that if they do not reply within a specified time (7 days in this case) the goods are accepted and payment of the noted amount is due (£20). But the Felthouse rule applies, and mere silence is insufficient. Control of inertia Selling is part of Unsolicited Goods and Services Act 19715 and amended in, Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 6. These regulations state:- "If unsolicited goods are sent to a person ("the recipient") with a view to his acquiring them..... The recipient may, as between himself and the sender, use, deal with or dispose of the goods as if they were an unconditional gift to him. The rights of the sender to the goods are extinguished."7 They Outlaw Inertia selling, and the recipient of such goods can treat them as 'unconditional gifts'. It is also an offence to request payment for such goods or services, punishable by a fine. To round up the case, no contract was entered into because the counter offer destroyed the £20 offer. Mere silence cannot amount to acceptance. And finally Tom is not required to return the book to Mary as she entered into inertia selling, so the law views the book as an unconditional gift. ...read more.

Conclusion

An offer was made in the form of an advertisement and the performance of certain conditions by the plaintiff, stipulated in the advert constituted an acceptance. In this case it was to pay £100 to anyone who became ill with flu whilst using Carbolic Smoke Balls as prescribed on the instructions. This case shows that acceptance need not be conveyed. As Sir Henry, in his offer, states that he will 'reward' Spartacus with £1000, a second case can back up the validity of the formation of contractual obligation. Earlier than Carlill v Carbolic several reward cases emerged. In the case of Williams v Cardwine (1833)13 it was held that published 'Reward' offers i.e. The offerer to pay anyone who performs the conditions of publications, and thus accepts the offer, must be payed the published sum. The only difference between this and the case of Sir Harry is that the offer is only to one person. In answer to the initial question, I believe Sir Harry is bound in contract with Spartacus, and therefore must pay him if he buys a suitable trailer and boat. Cases Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334 3 Felthouse v Bindley (1862) 11 CBNS 869 3 Tweedle v Atkinson (1861) 1 B&S 393 5 Lampleigh v Braithwaite (1615) 5 Balfour v Balfour (1919) 5 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Proprietory estoppel

    It is in that sense, and that sense only, that such a promise gives rise to an estoppel" - Denning J. 8 Requirements to satisfy a valid contract: An agreement between the parties; An intention to be legally bound; Certainty to the terms in the contract; and of course Consideration.

  2. Trust Law: 'Where an unincorporated association is dissolved, the present law presumes that ...

    follow the approach of authorities such as Re Recher, whilst differing from that of the authorities such as Re West Sussex.

  1. Promissory Estoppel

    The first stage of the estoppel which revolves around equitable estoppel has moved on to the contract stage where promissory estoppel was accepted in replacement of consideration.48 Yet, the substitution of consideration raised a similar question as to the English promissory estoppel where the doctrine seems to be an alternative to consideration.

  2. agrrement offer and acceptance

    The doctrine was later heard of in Central London Property Trust v High Trees House 32 but where from 1937 the defendants leased a block of flats from the claimant to sub-let to tenants. During the war the defendant was unable to pay the rent.

  1. Third party rights contract law problem question. The given case is concerned with ...

    not sell them under the authority or with the consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title to the goods than the seller had, unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller's authority to sell." (Office of Public Sector Information 1979).

  2. contract law

    the former is capable of being turned into an agreement by acceptance of the offer, but the latter cannot be accepted * Confusion can sometimes arise when what would appear to be an offer is held by the law to be only an invitation to treat, especially in the following

  1. Commercial Law in UK

    on terms that the foil remained S's property until B had paid all debts due to S4. Until then, B was required to store the foil separately from its own property. The case went further where although B was allowed to manufacture products using the unpaid foil the products were to be transferred to S 'as surety'.

  2. Contract law - review of cases.

    as an express denial of intention to create legal relations (case Rose and Frank Co v Crompton Bros â 1925). 1. Consideration Consideration is another factor that contributes to a binding contract. There must be an exchange of promises between promisor and promisee.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work