• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Principals of Law.

Extracts from this document...


Principals of Law Coursework R.J. Carmichael Contents Introduction Brief Definitions Task 1- What Remedies does Mary have Against Tom Task 2- Spartacus Graduates with 1st class honours. Is Sir Harry Bound in contract to pay Spartacus? Task 2- Suppose Sir Harry had said "If you buy a suitable boat and trailer I will reward you with £1000". Is Sir Harry Bound in Contract to Spartacus? Cases- List of cases used. Bibliography- List of material used Introduction Mozley and Whitleys Law Dictionary1 states a contract to be, "An agreement between competent persons, upon legal consideration, to do or abstain from doing some act." For the purpose of this essay we will look at the classical contract model. This consists of three essential members:- 1) Agreement- to do something in return for a promise. 2) Consideration- exchange of something of value (but not necessarily of equal value) 3) Intension to be bound- to make a binding agreement, enforceable in law. Although they make up the essential members other requirements must be met. These include compliance with Common Law and Statute (e.g. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1997), or other legal requirements (e.g. age of consent) It must also be noted that the agreement requirement of a contract is split up into two essential components. ...read more.


goods to a person, stipulating that if they do not reply within a specified time (7 days in this case) the goods are accepted and payment of the noted amount is due (£20). But the Felthouse rule applies, and mere silence is insufficient. Control of inertia Selling is part of Unsolicited Goods and Services Act 19715 and amended in, Consumer Protection (Distance Selling) Regulations 2000 6. These regulations state:- "If unsolicited goods are sent to a person ("the recipient") with a view to his acquiring them..... The recipient may, as between himself and the sender, use, deal with or dispose of the goods as if they were an unconditional gift to him. The rights of the sender to the goods are extinguished."7 They Outlaw Inertia selling, and the recipient of such goods can treat them as 'unconditional gifts'. It is also an offence to request payment for such goods or services, punishable by a fine. To round up the case, no contract was entered into because the counter offer destroyed the £20 offer. Mere silence cannot amount to acceptance. And finally Tom is not required to return the book to Mary as she entered into inertia selling, so the law views the book as an unconditional gift. ...read more.


An offer was made in the form of an advertisement and the performance of certain conditions by the plaintiff, stipulated in the advert constituted an acceptance. In this case it was to pay £100 to anyone who became ill with flu whilst using Carbolic Smoke Balls as prescribed on the instructions. This case shows that acceptance need not be conveyed. As Sir Henry, in his offer, states that he will 'reward' Spartacus with £1000, a second case can back up the validity of the formation of contractual obligation. Earlier than Carlill v Carbolic several reward cases emerged. In the case of Williams v Cardwine (1833)13 it was held that published 'Reward' offers i.e. The offerer to pay anyone who performs the conditions of publications, and thus accepts the offer, must be payed the published sum. The only difference between this and the case of Sir Harry is that the offer is only to one person. In answer to the initial question, I believe Sir Harry is bound in contract with Spartacus, and therefore must pay him if he buys a suitable trailer and boat. Cases Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334 3 Felthouse v Bindley (1862) 11 CBNS 869 3 Tweedle v Atkinson (1861) 1 B&S 393 5 Lampleigh v Braithwaite (1615) 5 Balfour v Balfour (1919) 5 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. Trust Law: 'Where an unincorporated association is dissolved, the present law presumes that ...

    Until recently, the present law left little scope for trusts on dissolution, favouring the contract approach. For once contributions had been paid into the funds, individual interests no longer existed in that contribution, only beneficial interests in the fund as a whole existed through contract.

  2. Business Law Counter Offer Essay

    As is the rule of counter offer, it is by the discretion of the offeree if he wishes to accept or reject any later offers. Indeed the manager accepted the offer and even extended the period to "10 minutes". What needs to be established is whether or not this statement

  1. What are the advantages of a bill of exchange over other methods of payment?

    In some circumstances it is better to use documentary credits, for example when you are conducting in international trade and would have to discount the bill with a bank to finance the shipment. If the buyer refuses to pay for the goods then the seller, as drawer, would be liable to the bank.

  2. contract law

    however the buyer may not revoke his offer * Another special situation is in that of unilateral contracts (e.g. offering a reward for the return of a lost item) * It has been suggested that offers of unilateral contracts should be regarded as irrevocable once performance has started, but it

  1. agrrement offer and acceptance

    However there are exceptions in the case of unilateral contracts. The communication of withdrawal must be made by a method which reaches substantially the same audience as the original offer (Shuey v United State)24. So even though the revocation was not communicated to everyone it would still be effective.

  2. Promissory Estoppel

    The expectations and reliance of the promisee would be a subjective matter where the court would have to apply some standard measurements in determining the expectations and detriments caused. However, arguments on reasonable expectation, equality, rule of law and consistency in public law could not have the similar force in

  1. Proprietory estoppel

    the plaintiff, though the defendant was not prepare and did not expressly said that he would pay the plaintiff the 100 pounds. This had shown that consideration had found a cause of action.40 For promissory estoppel, it was discussed above that it couldn't be used to found a cause of

  2. Contract law - review of cases.

    So, in the case in the scenario, Ms. Smith could not return the item to Mr. Jones. Her action was a breach of the contract. About EZ Cooking, it is Ms. Smith who voided the contract. However, the company had a chance to mitigate the loss.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work