• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Property law legal explanatory memorandum on the historical and modern day fee tail estate.

Extracts from this document...


Property law legal explanatory memorandum on the historical and modern day fee tail estate. What is a fee tail estate? It is one of the freehold estates; the others being fee-simple and life estate. The purpose of this type of estate is the desire of landowners to keep the land in the family name or to keep power and wealth. It is conditional on the original grantee and his descendant's survival. Where the last of the grantees descendants dies it will revert back to the grantor. It is created by the words of limitation 'heir' followed by some words of procreation. E.g. to A and the heirs of his body, or to A in tail since Conveyancing Act 1881. An estate tail may be created by will only by the same words of limitation as those required in a deed: Section 95 of the Succession Act 1965. S.95. Owner and tenant in tail. * a tail male/female are entails where the property descended to males or females exclusively. ...read more.


(S.39) S.15 stops a tenant in tail from utilising a disentailing assurance. S.32 requires the protector of settlements consent in order for execution of the deed to be fully effective. If consent is not obtained a base fee will be developed and not a fee simple. S.16 and 33 allows the holder of a base fee to create a fee simple in two ways: by a fresh disentailing assurance or the holder may wait for protectorship to end. S.37 recognises a holder of base fee may buy out immediate fee simple remainder of reversion and such is free of all claims by issue in tail reminder/reversion men. 'Anderson argues this statement disincentives the creation of fee tails'. Statute of limitations (1957) S.19 of holder of the base fee has no entitlement under the original entail his possession of land for 12 years after the end of protectorship can bar claims of those entitlement to the land on the determination of the fee-tail. Conveyancing Act (1881) ...read more.


The rules set out by this case is that such dispositions will operate to pass a fee simple/ tail notwithstanding the literal meaning of the term used. Law of Fee- tail. Nowadays this system of conveyance/ estate is very seldom used in practice and therefore the old legislation on it as well as famous cases serves only historical importance now. I see the system as having very little advantage to our law system and the Law Reform Commission also viewed in a similar way. They recommended that it was serving no purpose but having said that they did not recommend its abolition as it is doing no harm and some people may wish to use it from time to time. It is also the view of the commission, that the creation of a base fee, if the entail is bared, should not be registered in the High court as it is excessive and a new system of registering the disentailing deed in the Land Registry or on the Registry of Deeds should be formed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Restitution is now well established as a modern legal discipline. It has it own ...

    If "wrong" is defined as a breach of duty without any further qualification, its meaning is greatly enlarged: torts, equitable wrongs and breach of contract all find their cause in a breach of a duty, be it a duty owed to society, or to the other contracting party.

  2. Property Law Land Leases

    It seems, therefore, that Courts are moving steadily towards a major restructuring of a landlord and tenant law (along contractual lines). Surely, the whole point of the so-called lease/licence distinction was to draw a clear dividing line between personal and proprietary rights, where leases are proprietary and licences are personal.

  1. Intellectual Property Law.

    The intellectual property law is based on the idea of what is good for society and public in general,4 however, the noble concept of public domain is there alone to face the variety of threats, has nobody to protect or even care about it, we are all public domain users,

  2. Intellectual Property –Copyright.

    was not justifiable in England, and the rights claimed under article 8 of the Convention (entitlement to 'respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence') were not legal or equitable rights. Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CPDA), which has now amended to adopt EU Directives

  1. Historically, property has always been divided into two categories - real property and personal ...

    Such mortage requires payment or the owner of the mortgage can seek foreclosure. Personal property can often be secured with similar kind of device called a security interest. Real property is a term given to property that was the subject matter of a real action in the common law courts.

  2. The recognition of the legal personality of the company.

    The tactic can be expressed as reaching through the veil and seizing the controlling shareholders personally. By doing this the courts can apportion responsibility upon the shareholders for the acts of the company and ascertain their direct interest in the company's assets.

  1. Dispute Solving - Solicitors, Barristers, and Legal executives

    if the jury has been vetted it could be argued that there should be no need to challenge the jury once sworn in. A challenge to the array This was established in the Jury's Act 1974 s5. Under this a jury or a single juror can be challenged for not being representative.

  2. Intellectual Property Law.

    In addition, there has grown a body of thought which focuses its criticism of the current law on its perceived association with the Romantic notion of authorship as an individualistic act as opposed to the more collaborative, collective and arguably more relevant concept of authorship.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work