• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

University Degree: Public Law

Browse by

Currently browsing by:

Rating:
4 star+ (6)
3 star+ (9)
Submitted within:
last month (1)
last 3 months (1)
last 6 months (1)
last 12 months (1)

Meet our team of inspirational teachers

find out about the team

Get help from 80+ teachers and hundreds of thousands of student written documents

  • Marked by Teachers essays 19
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  1. Marked by a teacher

    Illustrating your answer with case law, assess the extent to which the exercise of the Royal Prerogative is controlled by the courts. Should the exercise of the royal prerogative be subject to more stringent control by parliament or the courts?

    5 star(s)

    Both Dicey and Blackstone tried to give their interpretation of a prerogative. Dicey argued that, 'an act that can be performed lawfully without an Act of Parliament, is done in virtue of this prerogative'. Blackstone's interpretation was that a prerogative was 'a special pre-eminence that the king hath over and above all other persons'. Dicey was able to put his interpretation into practice, as most prerogatives are now exercised by the government. Having established some of the different interpretations that exist, it is clear that these powers are indeed 'special', but that does not mean to say that they may override any conflicting interests.

    • Word count: 1658
  2. Marked by a teacher

    Rule of Law

    4 star(s)

    Law judgments create similar problems due to their thorough and consequently lengthy nature. However, the superiority of common law judgments over single Privy Council judgments holds true, as a single judgment supported by very concise concurrences can cause continuing problems of interpretation. Lord Bingham's second sub-rule affirms that legal issues should be resolved by application of the law and not the exercise of discretion. Despite Dicey's hostility to the exercise of discretions, this sub-rule is not strictly followed. For instance, it has been a practice in the immigration field to invite the Secretary of State to exercise his discretion to

    • Word count: 1151
  3. Marked by a teacher

    Essay on the function of Judicial Review

    4 star(s)

    This analysis should provide some good indications as to what the primary purpose of judicial review is. The first ground set out in the CCSU case is illegality. This occurs when a power is exercised which is not granted by the law regulating that power. In Allingham v The Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries (1948) the Minister had a power to delegate the provisions of the authority to a committee. This committee then attempted to sub-delegate, but when the sub-delegated officer attempted to enforce his decision it was quashed on judicial review for being illegal.

    • Word count: 1823
  4. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the view that the royal prerogative is insufficiently controlled by either Parliament or the judiciary.

    4 star(s)

    The Legislature effects control upon Executive use of the prerogative both by the actions of members as individuals and by the actions of the Legislature as a body. Question time, early day motions, written answers to MP's questions and debate are all parliamentary procedures in which individual members of the Legislature act as "dispassionate arbiters of the national interest"3. Unfortunately, in addition to the somewhat poor level of resources provided to individual members, the capacity of a member to engage in non-partisan evaluation of the exercise of government powers can be hobbled by party politics.

    • Word count: 1477
  5. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the Arguments For and Against Having a Written Constitution.

    4 star(s)

    This case highlights a fundamental reason why a written constitution would be useful as it protects the civil and political rights of the state. It should be noted however that the United States of America's written documentation of "a declaration of the country's supreme laws"1, in the form of a written constitution does not deter a government from trying to pass legislation which is unconstitutional, as the case above shows. A documentation of such rules does exist in the United Kingdom, even though it is not written under one document; the impact of the rules is not dissimilar from above showing that breaches of the constitution can be highlighted through documentation such as the Human Rights Act 1998.

    • Word count: 1418
  6. Marked by a teacher

    There is no absolute separation of powers in this country, in a variety of important ways ideas of the separation of powers have shaped constitutional arrangements and influenced our constitutional thinking, and continue to do so" Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    The making of procedural rules governing judicial process is an example of law making by the judiciary rather than by the legislature and the fact that the courts obtain their power from the Crown shows that within the UK, there is a clear overlap of functions between the agencies, which should be strictly separated according to the notion of the separation of powers. The concept of the separation of powers assumes that not only the functions of the three branches of the State should be distinct from one another but the personnel of these agencies should also be different and yet in the UK, there is a clear fusion of personnel within the system of government.

    • Word count: 1900
  7. Marked by a teacher

    Prerogative powers are very important source of UK Constitution dealing with issues such as foreign affairs. There are not written down, and can only be followed in common law. All major prerogative is now regulated by conventions.[1] Despite being the Mo

    3 star(s)

    forces and commissioning its officers (Chandler v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 763), the prerogative of mercy (R v Foster [1985] QB 115), protecting the public interest (Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers [1978] AC 435), keeping the Queen's peace (R v Home Secretary, ex parte Northumbria Police Authority [1989] 1 QB 26) , defence of the realm and emergency powers (Burmah Oil v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75), the administration of justice (Prohibition del Roy [1603] 12 Co Rep 63).

    • Word count: 1171
  8. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent (if at all) is it true to say that the United Kingdom constitution is based on a separation of powers?

    3 star(s)

    He also said, 'Nor is there liberty if the power of judging is not separate from legislative power and from executive power'. The reason for this is that the joined power, that is the legislature and the judiciary would be arbitrary over the life and liberty of its citizens, or in the case of executive and the judiciary, the judiciary would have the power and force of an oppressor. So with this information, is it possible for an answer to be found?

    • Word count: 1865
  9. Marked by a teacher

    “It cannot be too strongly emphasised that the British Constitution, though largely unwritten, is firmly based on the separation of powers” - Consider the extent to which this view is accurate.

    3 star(s)

    - The Executive - This is the Government. The function of the government is to run the country in the interest of the general public. The Prime Minister, the civil services, the police and other ministers make up the government of a country - The Judiciary - The final division of a states' activity is in the form of the courts. It is their job to apply the law, which the Legislature makes. By having different bodies performing different functions, it enables each to focus on their own job and so that 'power is not concentrated in one area' (AS Level Law, Andrew Mitchell and Minel Dadhania, 2003).

    • Word count: 1598
  10. Marked by a teacher

    ROYAL PEROGATIVES

    The history of the royal prerogatives was created by James 1 between 1603-1625. James 1 was the king of England and Scotland, and when he became king, he appointed himself head of parliament, courts and statutes. Powers of the King were legally based on the royal prerogatives. Between 1625-1700 various events occurred which lead to the reduction of the king's powers under the royal prerogative and the emergence of parliamentary supremacy. Crown's powers were reduced due to political parties and the principle of ministerial responsibility to parliament. Royal prerogatives are discretionary powers, they are crown's powers.

    • Word count: 1616
  11. In this essay I will define the constitution, its main elements and its aim. Moreover I will explain the structure of the British constitution and its sources which are divided as legal rules and non legal rules. Then I will explain the constitutional con

    establish and regulate or govern the government'.2 The main elements of the constitution are the establishment of the institutions of the state and the powers of those institutions, setting out the relationship between different institutions and between the institutions and individuals. The aim of a constitution is to ensure stability and order, the legitimacy of government institutions, to establish the break with the past, to limit the government's powers and to reach the principles and goal which underlie in it.

    • Word count: 1301
  12. Judicial review, as described by Lord Diplock, provides the means by which judicial control of administrative action is exercised. In order for the clients to apply for judicial review, the claimants must have either a direct or personal interest in the d

    Firstly, Andy is faced with the issue of the failure to conduct a consultation properly. Secondly, the issue of the Secretary of State for Transport's failure to give each party an opportunity to be heard. Essentially, procedural unfairness occurs when the decision-maker fails to carry out: the relevant statutory procedures, e.g failure to consult, as well as abide by the principles of natural justice when they arriving to that decision, e.g failure to give each party an opportunity to be heard. Firstly, there are several cases in which Andy can rely his case on the Secretary of State's failure to conduct a proper consultation, such as R v Liverpool Corporation, ex parte Liverpool Taxi Operators Association1 as well as that in R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan2.

    • Word count: 1965
  13. Striking a balance - What GC & C v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis tells us about the protection of human rights in the United Kingdom.

    This particular case has relevant points of public interest which serve to enlighten us on the way the UK courts have interpreted the HRA, yet cannot give us a full indication of how and to what extent human rights have been protected in the UK. Thus, in this work, we will focus primarily on Article 8 of the ECHR and, using the above mentioned case as our basis, the doctrine of proportionality, which has become an essential component in the reasoning of the courts regarding human rights.

    • Word count: 1353
  14. It is correct to say that the United Kingdom does not have a constitution. Critically evaluate this statement.

    1 From this definition I could acknowledge that a constitution is a structure planned for government which is codified as a written document; this document includes fundamental laws and principles. Furthermore it generally comprises basic political principles, and establishes the structure, actions, powers and duties of a government. These rules and regulations together amount to its individual distinct existence. When such values are written into a single or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to comprise a written constitution.

    • Word count: 1198
  15. Admin Law

    This means that its interest will not be greater than the ordinary person and will not have standing in regards to challenging the decision of ASA to the AAT. TAS may seek rely on the broader terms of S(27)(2)4 to have standing in the AAT. The section specifies that an organisation shall be taken to have interests, if the decision relates to a matter included in the objects of the organization. The object of TAS is to merely promote air safety. By challenging the decision it is taking on a more prohibitive role that goes beyond the description of promoting.

    • Word count: 1214
  16. The Factortame Litigation: death of UK Sovereignty

    Similarly, a contractual exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of one European State will "trump" other factors. The ruling of the European Court of Justice in Owusu v Jackson (t/a Villa Holidays Bal Inn Villas)1 "(ironically made in the interests of certainty) has served only to exacerbate the problems, leading to further litigation."2 Owusu v. Jackson Case C-281/02 Mr. Owusu was a British national domiciled in the UK and he brought a suit in the UK against Mr. Jackson and some other defendants for injuries he sustained while vacationing in Jamaica.

    • Word count: 1809
  17. Division of Powers

    This doctrine mainly divides the government into branches and distributes the power amongst these branches. In most of the governments these branches are: executive, judicial, and legislative. Almost every democratic government uses the separation of power to a certain degree. However, different countries use this doctrine to a different extent. In order to demonstrate this I will talk about two different jurisdictions, the Republic of Uzbekistan and the UK. History: Aristotle was the first person to identify the three elements of the constitution. According to him these elements were: * The deliberative: discusses everything of common importance.

    • Word count: 1576
  18. Parliamentary Supremacy

    has retained its importance in the English Legal System. The doctrine of precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis, which means to stand by things decided. It might be true that the sovereignty of Parliament is more complete in England than anywhere else. However, does it really mean that the rigidity of doctrine of precedent in this country is of no particular importance? Moreover, can we actually say that the doctrine of precedent is rigid? The main aim of my work is to show the importance of the doctrine of precedent and to prove that it is not rigid.

    • Word count: 1804
  19. Royal Prerogative

    Those prerogative powers are not written down, due to the unwritten constitution of the country and are based in common law. The prerogative has always remained an important source of Governmental power. Principles are: the conduction of foreign affairs (making treaties), the patronage power, commandment of armed forces, summoning and dissolving of Parliament, giving Royal Assent to legislation and the prerogative of mercy. BBC v Johns 5and Dumbarton District Council v Lord Advocate6 have two contrasting views of prerogative. Due to lack of documentation in BBC v Johns, has leaded to being unable to find out to what extent the royal prerogative has been used "...

    • Word count: 1842
  20. 'The House of Lords should be abolished. The UK only needs one chamber of parliament' Discuss

    None of the members of the House of Lords are elected by the electorate. When discussing the appointed nature of the House (albeit when discussing the possibility of a totally appointed chamber) Phillipson states that: 'an appointed House is derided as a giant quango, representing rule by an elite, lacking any democratic legitimacy and therefore ultimately ineffectual.'2The argument that the chamber is undemocratic is a valid one. Although the appointments are made largely by an elected Prime Minister, this is certainly a diluted and far more indirect sort of democracy. This method of appointment also leaves room for a certain amount of corruption, whereby peers are elected on financial basis rather than in the interests of the electorate.

    • Word count: 1739
  21. Free essay

    To what extent does the law impose compulsory terms on parties to contracts?

    and of course an implied term stating that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality (s.14(2)). There are many more implied conditions which are concerned with the quality, purpose and defects of the goods, which along with the sections mentioned above are for the protection of consumers rather than the intention of the parties. This growing concern for 'consumer protection' in relation to the consumer-welfarism theory, is further emphasised with the Unfair contract Terms Act 1977, which places strict limitations upon the ability of sellers to exclude the operation of these implied terms.

    • Word count: 1416
  22. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005

    This resulted in the government, deciding on a radical reform called the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (CRA) without any consultation. They had the desire to increase separation of Powers between judges and government and to comply with article six of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on judicial independence. The decision in the ECHR in McGonnel v United Kingdom2 distributed the Lord Chancellor's judicial role. This was because the court held that a breach in Article 6(1) of the ECHR (the right to a fair trial)

    • Word count: 1041
  23. Judicial Review

    If the local council is an authorised delegated power the three claimants when seeking judicial must fulfil essential criteria. Firstly, there needs to be an existence of a prima facie case to ensure that there appears to be a case to answer. Secondly, the claimants must have Locus Standi. This means that they must have the right to bring the case and have sufficient interest in the disputed matter. The court held in R v. Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employment and Small Business2 that as taxation arrangements did not apply to the individual members of the Federation then they did not have the right to bring the case.

    • Word count: 1607
  24. How far is the survival of the royal prerogative a standing affront to the principles of democratic constitutionalism?

    This view presents a serious conflict with the rule of law, as it suggests that the prerogative can be used to make moral and ethical decisions without the full consent of Parliament, the body which is meant to represent the electorate. Indeed, this is recognised in R v Somerset CC exp Fewings 4 where Laws LJ notes that "public bodies are subject to the rule of law" and the government cannot use prerogative powers "to an end for which they were never given" (although this underlying purpose is often unclear itself).

    • Word count: 1725
  25. When and to what extent should judges defer to Parliament or to the Executive in the protection of fundamental rights?

    As Jowell notes, there "will be occasions where other bodies, whether Parliament, the executive or a non-departmental public body containing specialist expertise, will be better equipped to decide certain questions"2 than the courts. However, this decision should not be made on the basis that courts should not decide what is in the public interest and they should bow to Parliament or the Executive just because of their status. Rather, the decision maker's reasoning should be examined and used to inform the court's decision.

    • Word count: 1507

Conclusion analysis

Good conclusions usually refer back to the question or title and address it directly - for example by using key words from the title.
How well do you think these conclusions address the title or question? Answering these questions should help you find out.

  1. Do they use key words from the title or question?
  2. Do they answer the question directly?
  3. Can you work out the question or title just by reading the conclusion?
  • To what extent does the law impose compulsory terms on parties to contracts?

    "In conclusion, it can be argued that the extent to which compulsory terms are imposed is greater with regards to statutes, rather than common law. Contracts for the supply of goods and services contain important implied terms(4), and the power to exclude these terms is severely restricted by legislation. Although, these terms are for the benefit of the consumer, if it were not for these conditions, sellers of goods would seek to avoid any liability for defects of goods for example. It is greatly left to the courts to 'fill the gaps' in contracts, and imply terms which would have been agreed between the parties anyway, or those terms which are so obvious and so have not been mentioned. On the other hand, there are certain limitations to their power; in this sense the extent is certainly restricted. Particular tests must be satisfied and the courts must consider whether both the parties would have agreed to the term, and not just whether a reasonable person would have done so. The courts have not claimed power to insist upon compulsory terms without statutory authority. Therefore the extent is pretty large, but all the same it is proportionate and compulsory terms are only generally imposed when they are actually required or when they are advantageous to the consumer."

  • Discuss the relevance of the concept of the rule of law to current constitutional arrangements in the UK

    "In conclusion complying with the rule of law may provide a check on abuse of power. It may provide a critical evaluation of how the power is used. Alone it is not a comprehensive code but must be used alongside other principles, which regulate the content of the legal rules. It can be argued that the rule of law is too vague, if the law is written down on paper it would be more accessible and easier to understand and obey. On the other side codification would require unnecessary money, time and effort what is the point on devising a remedy for something that works in the first place? Finally there are many interpretations of the doctrine of the rule of law, each having slightly different connotations. We all put into practice the principles of law everyday so we do have a basic idea what the law entails. Dicey's principle of the rule archaic, the general principle is still intact and forms part of the British Constitution today. It's the upholding of morality, faith and reasoning in the judiciary that gives the rule its eternal constitutional relevance rather than written rules. 1999 Words"

  • The proposal for a EU constitution has both advantages and disadvantages. However any moves towards the creation of a "federalist superstate" should be strenuously opposed. Critically discuss

    "In conclusion, the proposal for a European Union constitution has both advantages and disadvantages for all the Member States involved. And the advantages seem to outweigh the disadvantages so basically all the Union needs to do is to achieve a balance between the these two. And try in all fairness to try and satisfy all member states and citizens of the Union. And make sure it is democratic in all the policies it chooses to implement both now and in the future. Furthermore try as much as possible not to lean towards a federalist superstate form of government."

Marked by a teacher

This document has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the document.

Peer reviewed

This document has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the document page.

Peer reviewed

This document has been reviewed by one of our specialist student document reviewing squad. Read the full review under the document preview on this page.