Q.3 Discuss briefly "Consent", What is "Free Consent"?

Authors Avatar

Q.3 Discuss briefly “Consent”, What is “Free Consent”?

The term "Consent" is defined in section 13 of The Contract Act of 1872 as under:

“Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense”. 

8. 1988 AC 385. 
9. NLR 1993 CLJ 242. 
10. NLR 1994 CLJ 723. 
11. NLR 1995 AC 72. 

"Free consent" 

The “Free Consent” is defined in section 14 of The Contract Act of 1872 as under:

Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by

(1) coercion, as defined in section 15, or 

(2) undue influence, as defined in section 16, or 

(3) fraud, as defined in Section 17, or 

(4) misrepresentation, as defined in Section 18, or 

(5) mistake, subject to the provisions of Section 20, 21 and 22. 

     Consent is said to be so caused when it would not have been given but for the existence of such coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake. 

15. "Coercion"defined. "Coercion" is the committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Pakistan Penal Code or the unlawful detaining, or threatening  to detain, any property to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement. 

Explanation. It is immaterial whether the Pakistan Penal Code is or is not in force in the place where the coercion is employed. 

 COMMENTS

Contractor's claim to enhanced rate than accepted by him at  earlier stage. Matter referred to arbitrator. Arbitrator found that acceptance of relates by exclusively relatable to domain of facts. Arbitrator being Judge of facts and law, High Court would have no jurisdiction to give finding that he misconducted himself. Finding of  High Court (Single Judge) to the contrary was set aside while that of Trail Court making award rule of Court was restored.2 

Join now!

1. Subs. by Ordinance XXVII of 1981. 
2. PLD 1998 Lah. 132. 

16. "Undue influence" defined. (1) A contract is said to be induced by "undue influence" where the relation subsisting between the  parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other, and uses that position to obtain unfair advantage over the other. 

     (2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing principle, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of another--- 

     (a) where he holds a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay