• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Q1: What are the essentials of a "Valid Contract" Discuss?

Extracts from this document...


Q1: What are the essentials of a "Valid Contract" Discuss? A contract is made up of a promise of one person to do a certain thing in exchange for a promise from another person to do another thing. Contract law exists to make sure that people keep their promises and that if they do not, the law will enforce it upon them. Contract law is based on several Latin legal principles, the most important of which is consensus ad idem, which means a meeting of the minds between the parties or, in other words, a clear understanding, offering and acceptance of each person's contribution. Lawyers say that it is from the moment of " consensus ad idem" that a contract is formed and may be enforced by the courts. So a contract requires an agreement between the parties. But not all agreements are contracts. The general law of contract in Pakistan is contained in the Contract Act 1872. English decision's (where relevant) are also cited in the courts. The Act defines "contract" as an agreement enforceable by law. The essentials of a (valid) contract are: 1. intention to create a contract; 2. offer and acceptance; 3. consideration; 4. capacity to enter into a contract; 5. free consent of the parties; 6. lawful object of the agreement; Writing is not essential for the validity of a contract, except where a specific statutory provision requires writing. An arbitration clause must be in writing. 1. Intention to create a contract ????????????????????????????? A definite intention to be bound is highlighted. ...read more.


(b) A statement which invites the other party to make an offer (e.g., a notice inviting tenders). (c) Statement of lowest price. It is regarded as an invitation to make offers. (d) Display of goods in a ship with price tags. (It is merely an invitation to make an offer, so that the trader may not accept the offer, if the price is incorrectly marked. Termination of offer Some parties clearly indicate that their statements or documents do not constitute offers, e.g., estate agents."These particulars do not form, nor constitute any part of an offer, or a contract, for sale". Until an offer is accepted, it creates no legal rights and it may be terminated at any time in a variety of ways. Quality of acceptance Acceptance of an offer must be absolute and must correspond with the terms of the offer. This rule, a key constituent of the basic premise, does not always accord with the realities of complex business contract negotiations today. Such negotiations may indeed proceed through a series of proposals, counter-proposals, withdrawals, variations and qualifications, before agreement (or otherwise) is reached. When parties carry on lengthy negotiations, it may be hard to say exactly when an offer has been made and acceptance. A conditional offer, if accepted, must be accepted along with all the conditions. However, in regard to international agreements governed by the U.N. Convention on contracts for international sale of goods, there is a slight qualifications, in as much as, article 19 of the Vienna Convention provides that non material variations between offer and acceptance do not make a difference. ...read more.


Remedies for breach of contract The principal remedies for breach of contract are: (a) damages; (b) specific performance of the contract; and (c) injunction. When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, being loss or damages which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach or which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it. Such compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss of damage sustained by reason of the breach. The same principle applies for determining damages for breach of an obligation arising from quasi-contract. In estimating the loss or damage arising from a breach of contract, the means which existed of remedying the inconvenience caused by the non-performance of the contract must be taken into account. This is referred to, as the duty to mitigate. Illustration A stipulation for increased interest from the date of default may be regarded as a stipulation by "way of penalty", if the amount is excessive. The court is empowered to reduce it to an amount reasonable in the circumstances. Specific performance and injunctions In certain special cases dealt with in the Specific Relief Act, the court may direct against the party in default "specific performance" of the contract, that is to say, the party may be directed to perform the very obligation which he has undertaken, by the contract. This relief is awarded only in exceptional cases. That Act also deals with permanent injunctions. Temporary injunctions are governed by the provisions of order of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. "The current law of duress and undue influence is so unclear that it creates ...

    The bank appealed by arguing that it had discharged its duty by urging the defendant to seek legal advice and could not be responsible if she failed to do so. It was held that the bank knew of the relationship of the employer and employee and should have been aware that there was a real possibility of undue influence.

  2. Essay on Construction Contract scenario. Ram Solutions (The Contractor), delivering a 15m new ...

    as the DTP only allowed for a 50% survey, which the contractor was aware of on novation. However the additional cost to the new design of the foundation and steel was deemed reasonable as this would have been the only solution in the first place, had 100% surveys been conducted on site.

  1. It is only in the rarest circumstances that a court will deem a contract ...

    (The Nema)30 where only 2 out of the 7 anticipated voyages were possible due to strikes. Many cases were frustrated due to the outbreak of war, such as Morgan v Manser31 where a music hall artiste was excused from his obligations following conscription, and Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr

  2. UCTA Q

    Exclusion clauses are currently treated more rigorously and restrictively than other terms and are treated as defences to a breach of contract as opposed to duty- defining terms. The hostility of the courts and parliament to exclusion clauses illustrates consumer welfarism and an altruistic concern for the other party.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    since there was no highest complying bid there was no acceptance of the offer such that a contract formed. Many invitations to tender will specify that in the case of joint highest bids there will be a method for choosing between them, for example, the earliest of the bids will prevail.

  2. agrrement offer and acceptance

    If Rubina spent a further �200 on the 4th of October when she found out about the offer then she would have had a contract. By the time Jane hands in her recites and slogan the offer by Sports 4 All had already been revoked.

  1. Types of circumstances leading to frustration.

    supervening event will not exclude frustration if the provision is not complete. A charter party may, for example, provide that the ship owner is not liable for delays due to certain events beyond his control. Such a clause will not prevent the charterer from relying on such delay as a ground of frustration.

  2. Questions on Offer and Acceptance.

    That meant the court believed that its display of goods was an ?invitation to treat?, as the customer made an offer by approaching a cashier, with the cashier accepting by the action that indicated the readiness to sell. Thus it was said that no offence was there as the offer

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work