• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Q1: What are the essentials of a "Valid Contract" Discuss?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q1: What are the essentials of a "Valid Contract" Discuss? A contract is made up of a promise of one person to do a certain thing in exchange for a promise from another person to do another thing. Contract law exists to make sure that people keep their promises and that if they do not, the law will enforce it upon them. Contract law is based on several Latin legal principles, the most important of which is consensus ad idem, which means a meeting of the minds between the parties or, in other words, a clear understanding, offering and acceptance of each person's contribution. Lawyers say that it is from the moment of " consensus ad idem" that a contract is formed and may be enforced by the courts. So a contract requires an agreement between the parties. But not all agreements are contracts. The general law of contract in Pakistan is contained in the Contract Act 1872. English decision's (where relevant) are also cited in the courts. The Act defines "contract" as an agreement enforceable by law. The essentials of a (valid) contract are: 1. intention to create a contract; 2. offer and acceptance; 3. consideration; 4. capacity to enter into a contract; 5. free consent of the parties; 6. lawful object of the agreement; Writing is not essential for the validity of a contract, except where a specific statutory provision requires writing. An arbitration clause must be in writing. 1. Intention to create a contract ????????????????????????????? A definite intention to be bound is highlighted. ...read more.

Middle

(b) A statement which invites the other party to make an offer (e.g., a notice inviting tenders). (c) Statement of lowest price. It is regarded as an invitation to make offers. (d) Display of goods in a ship with price tags. (It is merely an invitation to make an offer, so that the trader may not accept the offer, if the price is incorrectly marked. Termination of offer Some parties clearly indicate that their statements or documents do not constitute offers, e.g., estate agents."These particulars do not form, nor constitute any part of an offer, or a contract, for sale". Until an offer is accepted, it creates no legal rights and it may be terminated at any time in a variety of ways. Quality of acceptance Acceptance of an offer must be absolute and must correspond with the terms of the offer. This rule, a key constituent of the basic premise, does not always accord with the realities of complex business contract negotiations today. Such negotiations may indeed proceed through a series of proposals, counter-proposals, withdrawals, variations and qualifications, before agreement (or otherwise) is reached. When parties carry on lengthy negotiations, it may be hard to say exactly when an offer has been made and acceptance. A conditional offer, if accepted, must be accepted along with all the conditions. However, in regard to international agreements governed by the U.N. Convention on contracts for international sale of goods, there is a slight qualifications, in as much as, article 19 of the Vienna Convention provides that non material variations between offer and acceptance do not make a difference. ...read more.

Conclusion

Remedies for breach of contract The principal remedies for breach of contract are: (a) damages; (b) specific performance of the contract; and (c) injunction. When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, being loss or damages which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach or which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it. Such compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss of damage sustained by reason of the breach. The same principle applies for determining damages for breach of an obligation arising from quasi-contract. In estimating the loss or damage arising from a breach of contract, the means which existed of remedying the inconvenience caused by the non-performance of the contract must be taken into account. This is referred to, as the duty to mitigate. Illustration A stipulation for increased interest from the date of default may be regarded as a stipulation by "way of penalty", if the amount is excessive. The court is empowered to reduce it to an amount reasonable in the circumstances. Specific performance and injunctions In certain special cases dealt with in the Specific Relief Act, the court may direct against the party in default "specific performance" of the contract, that is to say, the party may be directed to perform the very obligation which he has undertaken, by the contract. This relief is awarded only in exceptional cases. That Act also deals with permanent injunctions. Temporary injunctions are governed by the provisions of order of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. This paper discusses the start-up, organisation and conduct of the company "Anders & Birgitte" ...

    If the employer wants to ensure that he is assigned the copyright to works created by his employees, he should generally - with the exemption of computer programmes, cf. s. 59 - specify this in the employment contract. Since Anders & Birgitte would like to make sure that DF do

  2. Agreement made by minors are not contracts. Discuss

    Hence, the contract was unenforceable. Another case is 'Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose' 9. The defendant (a minor), borrowed a sum from the plaintiff by executing a mortgage of his property in favor of the defendant. Subsequently, the defendant sued for setting aside the mortgage.

  1. "The current law of duress and undue influence is so unclear that it creates ...

    Nevertheless, the bank had not explained the potential extent of her liability to the defendant. In such circumstances the bank needed to ensure that the defendant obtained independent legal advice. Therefore the bank had constructive notice of undue influence and the transaction should be set aside.

  2. Types of circumstances leading to frustration.

    hand, clauses dealing with export or import prohibition are commonly upheld as illustrated in the case of Johnson Matthey Bankers Ltd v State trading Corporation of India Ltd13 they assume that the prohibition will be observed and do not subvert its purpose.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    It may, therefore, be preferable to say, as Burrows14 suggests, that there is a subsidiary unilateral contract whereby the offeror promises not to revoke the offer of the main unilateral contract once the offeree has started to perform. If that were the case then in our scenario Graham has broken this subsidiary unilateral contract rather than the principal contract.

  2. 1.0) Introduction

    170 CLR 394 at p 410, per Mason CJ. 3 Amalgamated Investment & Property Co Ltd (In liquidation) v Texas Commerce International Bank Ltd [1982] QB 84 at p 103, per Robert Goff J. 4 [1878] H.L 5 [1947] KB 130 6 (1854) 5 HL Cas 185 7 (1951)

  1. Topic 6 : Remedies For Breach of Contract the Remedies Available To the Injured ...

    He entered into a contract of employment with Lamont, which contained a clause providing that in the event of termination of the contract, Lamont would not carry on business as a tailor at any place within a 15 kilometre radius of Melbourne.

  2. Discuss the development of doctrine of frustration regard to the law of contact

    Ltd39. The plaintiff paid $412500 in advance to defendant. The contract was frustrated afterwards, both parties had incurred expenses before it and it was wholly wasted. Neither was left with residual benefit or advantage. Robert Goff J. ordered the $412500 to be return to the plaintiff without deduction as losses suffered by defendant was smaller.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work